Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
Results: Two 3D breast volume measurements showed an excellent reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.991), which was comparable to the reliability of MRI measurements (intra-class correlation coefficient: 0.990). Mean (SD) breast volume measured with 3D breast volume was 454?cm3 (157) and with MRI was 687?cm3 (312). These volumes were significantly different, but a linear association could be found: y(MRI) = 1.58 × (3D) - 40. Three-dimensional breast volume was not significantly different from volume estimation made by plastic surgeons (472?cm3 (69), P = 0.323).
Conclusions: The 3D imaging system measures lower volumes for breasts than MRI. However, 3D measurements show a linear association with MRI and have excellent reliability, making them an objective and reproducible measuring method suitable for clinical practice.
SUBMITTER: Killaars RC
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7722547 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Killaars Renee C RC Preuβ Myriam L G MLG de Vos Nathalie J P NJP van Berlo Camille C J L Y CCJLY Lobbes Marc B I MBI van der Hulst René R W J RRWJ Piatkowski Andrzej A AA
Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open 20201125 11
Three-dimensional (3D) camera systems are increasingly used for computerized volume calculations. In this study we investigate whether the Vectra XT 3D imaging system is a reliable tool for determination of breast volume in clinical practice. It is compared with the current gold standard in literature, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and current clinical practice (plastic surgeon's clinical estimation).<h4>Methods</h4>Breast volumes of 29 patients (53 breasts) were evaluated. 3D images were ac ...[more]