Dataset Information

State-Level Variation in Waitlist Mortality and Transplant Outcomes Among Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation in the US From 2011 to 2016.

ABSTRACT: Importance: Little is known about geographic variation in the outcomes of adult patients listed for heart transplantation in the US. Identifying the patterns and extent of variation is important to minimize disparity in outcomes.

Objective: To evaluate the geographic patterns, extent, and factors associated with state-level variation in outcomes of adult patients listed for heart transplantation in the US.

Design, setting, and participants: This nationwide retrospective cohort study used data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database to identify adult patients listed for heart transplantation at status 1A between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2016. Patients were followed up until March 31, 2018. Data were analyzed from November 1, 2019, to September 19, 2020.

Main outcomes and measures: The study evaluated state-level variation in the 3 main organ transplant measures: waitlist mortality, transplant rate, and risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival. The rate of death while on the waitlist and the rate of transplant were calculated for each state per 1000 waitlist person-days listed at status 1A over the study period. Risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival was calculated based on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients risk-adjustment model. State-level variation in each outcome measure was evaluated via multivariable-adjusted models.

Results: Across 50 states and the District of Columbia, a total of 15?036 patients (mean [SD] age, 52 [13] years; 3531 women [24%]; 9626 White [64%]) were listed at status 1A for adult heart transplantation between 2011 and 2016. Of those, 2146 patients (14.3%) died while on the waitlist, and 10?982 patients (73.0%) received transplants. Among those who received transplants, the median time on the waitlist was 31 days (interquartile range, 13-61 days). State-level outcomes ranged from 1.0 to 7.8 deaths per 1000 waitlist person-days for waitlist mortality, 5.6 to 34.5 transplants per 1000 waitlist person-days for transplant rate, and 87% to 92% for risk-adjusted 1-year graft survival. In a comparison of the highest and lowest quartiles, significant state-level variation was found in waitlist mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.53; 95% CI, 1.27-1.86), transplant rate (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.31-1.87), and 1-year graft survival (odds ratio, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.64-2.62).

Conclusions and relevance: The study's findings indicate that significant state-level variation exists in the outcomes of patients listed for heart transplantation in the US. Identifying and addressing the factors associated with these geographic variations in outcomes is important to ensure a fair allocation system.

SUBMITTER: Akintoye E

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7726636 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

State-Level Variation in Waitlist Mortality and Transplant Outcomes Among Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation in the US From 2011 to 2016.

Akintoye Emmanuel E Shin Doosup D Alvarez Paulino P Briasoulis Alexandros A

JAMA network open 20201201 12

<h4>Importance</h4>Little is known about geographic variation in the outcomes of adult patients listed for heart transplantation in the US. Identifying the patterns and extent of variation is important to minimize disparity in outcomes.<h4>Objective</h4>To evaluate the geographic patterns, extent, and factors associated with state-level variation in outcomes of adult patients listed for heart transplantation in the US.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>This nationwide retrospective cohort ...[more]

PMID: 33295970

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rationale & objectiveIntact cognition is generally a prerequisite for navigating through and completing evaluation for kidney transplantation. Despite kidney transplantation being contraindicated for those with severe dementia, screening for more mild forms of cognitive impairment before referral is rare. Candidates may have unrecognized cognitive impairment, which may prolong evaluation, elevate mortality risk, and hinder access to kidney transplantation. We estimated the burden of cognitive impairment and its association with access to kidney transplantation and waitlist mortality.Study designProspective cohort study.Setting & participants3,630 participants (January 2009 to June 2018) with cognitive function measured (by the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination [3MS]) at kidney transplantation evaluation at 1 of 2 transplantation centers.PredictorsCognitive impairment (3MS score<80).OutcomesListing, waitlist mortality, and kidney transplantation.Analytical approachWe estimated the adjusted chance of listing (Cox regression), risk for waitlist mortality (competing-risks regression), and kidney transplantation rate (Poisson regression) by cognitive impairment. Given potential differences in cause of cognitive impairment among those with and without diabetes, we tested whether these associations differed by diabetes status using a Wald test.ResultsAt evaluation, 6.4% of participants had cognitive impairment, which was independently associated with 25% lower chance of listing (adjusted HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91); this association did not differ by diabetes status (Pinteraction=0.07). There was a nominal difference by diabetes status for the association between cognitive impairment and kidney transplantation rate (Pinteraction=0.05), while the association between cognitive impairment and waitlist mortality differed by diabetes status kidney transplantation rates (Pinteraction=0.02). Among candidates without diabetes, those with cognitive impairment were at 2.47 (95% CI, 1.31-4.66) times greater risk for waitlist mortality; cognitive impairment was not associated with this outcome among candidates with diabetes.LimitationsSingle measure of cognitive impairment.ConclusionsCognitive impairment is associated with a lower chance of being placed on the waitlist, and among patients without diabetes, with increased mortality on the waitlist. Future studies should investigate whether implementation of screening for cognitive impairment improves these outcomes.

Project description:BackgroundGeographic disparities in access to deceased donor kidney transplantation persist in the United States under the Kidney Allocation System (KAS) introduced in 2014, and the effect of transplant center practices on the probability of transplantation for wait-listed patients remains unclear.MethodsTo compare probability of transplantation across centers nationally and within donation service areas (DSAs), we conducted a registry study that included all United States incident adult kidney transplant candidates wait listed in 2011 and 2015 (pre-KAS and post-KAS cohorts comprising 32,745 and 34,728 individuals, respectively). For each center, we calculated the probability of deceased donor kidney transplantation within 3 years of wait listing using competing risk regression, with living donor transplantation, death, and waiting list removal as competing events. We examined associations between center-level and DSA-level characteristics and the adjusted probability of transplant.ResultsCandidates received deceased donor kidney transplants within 3 years of wait listing more frequently post-KAS (22%) than pre-KAS (19%). Nationally, the probability of transplant varied 16-fold between centers, ranging from 4.0% to 64.2% in the post-KAS era. Within DSAs, we observed a median 2.3-fold variation between centers, with up to ten-fold and 57.4 percentage point differences. Probability of transplantation was correlated in the post-KAS cohort with center willingness to accept hard-to-place kidneys (r=0.55, P<0.001) and local organ supply (r=0.44, P<0.001).ConclusionsLarge differences in the adjusted probability of deceased donor kidney transplantation persist under KAS, even between centers working with the same local organ supply. Probability of transplantation is significantly associated with organ offer acceptance patterns at transplant centers, underscoring the need for greater understanding of how centers make decisions about organs offered to wait-listed patients and how they relate to disparities in access to transplantation.

Project description:ImportanceUnder the current Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services guidelines, there is incentivization to optimize posttransplant outcomes regardless of mortality among patients on the waitlist and transplant rates; few data exist with regard to transplant center acceptance practices and survival to heart transplant.ObjectivesTo evaluate the extent of variability in organ acceptance practices in the US and whether this center-level behavior is associated with heart transplant candidate survival.Design, setting, and participantsIn this retrospective cohort study, the US National Transplant Registry was queried for all match runs of adult candidates listed for isolated heart transplant between May 1, 2007, and March 31, 2017. Data analysis was conducted from October 30, 2018, to May 1, 2019. The final cohort included 93 transplant centers, 19 703 donors, and 9628 candidates.Main outcomes and measuresCenter acceptance rates for heart allografts offered to the highest-priority candidates, association between center acceptance rate and mortality among patients on the waitlist, and posttransplant outcomes between candidates who accepted their first-rank offers vs those who accepted previously declined offers.ResultsAmong 19 703 unique organ offers, 6302 hearts (32.0%) were accepted for first-rank candidates. After adjustment for donor, candidate, and geographic covariates, transplant centers varied in acceptance rates (12.3%-61.5%) of offers made to first-rank candidates. Higher acceptance rates were associated with lower cumulative incidence of 1-year mortality among patients on the waitlist. For every 10% increase in adjusted center acceptance rate, the risk of mortality decreased by 27% (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.67-0.80). No statistically significant difference was observed in 5-year adjusted posttransplant patient survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.94-1.11) and graft failure (subdistribution hazard ratio; 0.95; 95% CI, 0.83-1.09) between hearts accepted at the first-rank compared with lower-rank positions.Conclusions and relevanceVariability in heart allograft acceptance rates appears to exist among transplant centers, with candidates listed at lower acceptance rate centers being more likely to experience mortality while on the waitlist. Comparable posttransplant survival suggests that allografts that were declined as a first offer perform as well as those that were accepted at their first offer. These findings suggest that organ acceptance rate or time to transplant from being added to the waitlist may be an additional measure of heart transplant program performance.

Dataset Information

State-Level Variation in Waitlist Mortality and Transplant Outcomes Among Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation in the US From 2011 to 2016.

Publications

State-Level Variation in Waitlist Mortality and Transplant Outcomes Among Patients Listed for Heart Transplantation in the US From 2011 to 2016.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets