Discovery of Homobivalent Bitopic Ligands of the Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor*.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Morales P
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7756656 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Discovery of Homobivalent Bitopic Ligands of the Cannabinoid CB<sub>2</sub> Receptor*.
Morales Paula P Navarro Gemma G Gómez-Autet Marc M Redondo Laura L Fernández-Ruiz Javier J Pérez-Benito Laura L Cordomí Arnau A Pardo Leonardo L Franco Rafael R Jagerovic Nadine N
Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) 20201109 68
Single chemical entities with potential to simultaneously interact with two binding sites are emerging strategies in medicinal chemistry. We have designed, synthesized and functionally characterized the first bitopic ligands for the CB<sub>2</sub> receptor. These compounds selectively target CB<sub>2</sub> versus CB<sub>1</sub> receptors. Their binding mode was studied by molecular dynamic simulations and site-directed mutagenesis. ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:An agonist that acts through a single receptor can activate numerous signaling pathways. Recent studies have suggested that different ligands can differentially activate these pathways by stabilizing a limited range of receptor conformations, which in turn preferentially drive different downstream signaling cascades. This concept, termed "biased signaling" represents an exciting therapeutic opportunity to target specific pathways that elicit only desired effects, while avoiding undesired effects mediated by different signaling cascades. The cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 each activate multiple pathways, and evidence is emerging for bias within these pathways. This review will summarize the current evidence for biased signaling through cannabinoid receptor subtypes CB1 and CB2.
| S-EPMC5436336 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Cannabichromene (CBC) is one of the most abundant phytocannabinoids in Cannabis spp. It has modest antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects and potentiates some effects of ?9 -tetrahydrocannabinol in vivo. How CBC exerts these effects is poorly defined and there is little information about its efficacy at cannabinoid receptors. We sought to determine the functional activity of CBC at cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH:AtT20 cells stably expressing haemagglutinin-tagged human CB1 and CB2 receptors were used. Assays of cellular membrane potential and loss of cell surface receptors were performed. KEY RESULTS:CBC activated CB2 but not CB1 receptors to produce hyperpolarization of AtT20 cells. This activation was inhibited by a CB2 receptor antagonist AM630, and sensitive to Pertussis toxin. Application of CBC reduced activation of CB2 , but not CB1 , receptors by subsequent co-application of CP55,940, an efficacious CB1 and CB2 receptor agonist. Continuous CBC application induced loss of cell surface CB2 receptors and desensitization of the CB2 receptor-induced hyperpolarization. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS:CBC is a selective CB2 receptor agonist displaying higher efficacy than tetrahydrocannabinol in hyperpolarizing AtT20 cells. CBC can also recruit CB2 receptor regulatory mechanisms. CBC may contribute to the potential therapeutic effectiveness of some cannabis preparations, potentially through CB2 receptor-mediated modulation of inflammation.
| S-EPMC6932936 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Signaling through integral membrane G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is influenced by lipid composition of cell membranes. By using novel high affinity ligands of human cannabinoid receptor CB2, we demonstrate that cholesterol increases basal activation levels of the receptor and alters the pharmacological categorization of these ligands. Our results revealed that (2-(6-chloro-2-((2,2,3,3-tetramethylcyclopropane-1-carbonyl)imino)benzo[d]thiazol-3(2H)-yl)ethyl acetate ligand (MRI-2646) acts as a partial agonist of CB2 in membranes devoid of cholesterol and as a neutral antagonist or a partial inverse agonist in cholesterol-containing membranes. The differential effects of a specific ligand on activation of CB2 in different types of membranes may have implications for screening of drug candidates in a search of modulators of GPCR activity. MD simulation suggests that cholesterol exerts an allosteric effect on the intracellular regions of the receptor that interact with the G-protein complex thereby altering the recruitment of G protein.
| S-EPMC7881127 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Receptor internalization increases the flexibility and scope of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling. CB(1) and CB(2) cannabinoid receptors undergo internalization after sustained exposure to agonists. However, it is not known whether different agonists internalize CB(2) to different extents. Because CB(2) is a promising therapeutic target, understanding its trafficking in response to different agonists is necessary for a complete understanding of its biology. Here we profile a number of cannabinoid receptor ligands and provide evidence for marked functional selectivity of cannabinoid receptor internalization. Classic, aminoalkylindole, bicyclic, cannabilactone, iminothiazole cannabinoid, and endocannabinoid ligands varied greatly in their effects on CB(1) and CB(2) trafficking. Our most striking finding was that (R)-(+)-[2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-(4-morpholinylmethyl) pyrrolo-[1,2,3-d,e]-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl]-1-naphthalenyl-methanone (WIN55,212-2) (and other aminoalkylindoles) failed to promote CB(2) receptor internalization, whereas 5-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)-2-(5-hydroxy-2-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexyl)phenol (CP55,940) robustly internalized CB(2) receptors. Furthermore, WIN55,212-2 competitively antagonized CP55,940-induced CB(2) internalization. Despite these differences in internalization, both compounds activated CB(2) receptors as measured by extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation and recruitment of β-arrestin(2) to the membrane. In contrast, whereas CP55,940 inhibited voltage-gated calcium channels via CB(2) receptor activation, WIN55,212-2 was ineffective on its own and antagonized the effects of CP55,940. On the basis of the differences we found between these two ligands, we also tested the effects of other cannabinoids on these signaling pathways and found additional evidence for functional selectivity of CB(2) ligands. These novel data highlight that WIN55,212-2 and other cannabinoids show strong functional selectivity at CB(2) receptors and suggest that different classes of CB(2) ligands may produce diverse physiological effects, emphasizing that each class needs to be separately evaluated for therapeutic efficacy.
| S-EPMC3263955 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The cannabinoid CB2 receptor (CB2R) represents a promising therapeutic target for various forms of tissue injury and inflammatory diseases. Although numerous compounds have been developed and widely used to target CB2R, their selectivity, molecular mode of action and pharmacokinetic properties have been poorly characterized. Here we report the most extensive characterization of the molecular pharmacology of the most widely used CB2R ligands to date. In a collaborative effort between multiple academic and industry laboratories, we identify marked differences in the ability of certain agonists to activate distinct signalling pathways and to cause off-target effects. We reach a consensus that HU910, HU308 and JWH133 are the recommended selective CB2R agonists to study the role of CB2R in biological and disease processes. We believe that our unique approach would be highly suitable for the characterization of other therapeutic targets in drug discovery research.
| S-EPMC5216056 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The G protein-coupled type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1R) mediates virtually all classic cannabinoid effects, and both its agonists and antagonists hold major therapeutic potential. Heterologous expression of receptors is vital for pharmacological research, however, overexpression of these proteins may fundamentally alter their localization pattern, change the signalling partner preference and may also spark artificial clustering. Additionally, recombinant CB1Rs are prone to intense proteasomal degradation, which may necessitate substantial modifications, such as N-terminal truncation or signal sequence insertion, for acceptable cell surface expression. We report here that tuning down the expression intensity of the full-length CB1R reduces proteasomal degradation and offers receptor levels that are comparable to those of endogenous CB1 receptors. As opposed to high-efficiency expression with conventional promoters, weak promoter-driven CB1R expression provides ERK 1/2 and p38 MAPK signalling that closely resemble the activity of endogenous CB1Rs. Moreover, weakly expressed CB1R variants exhibit plasma membrane localization, preserve canonical Gi-signalling but prevent CB1R-Gs coupling observed with high-expression variants. Based on these findings, we propose that lowering the expression level of G protein-coupled receptors should always be considered in heterologous expression systems in order to reduce the pressure on the proteasomal machinery and to avoid potential signalling artefacts.
| S-EPMC8564136 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeCannabis or cannabinoids produce characteristic tetrad effects-analgesia, hypothermia, catalepsy and suppressed locomotion, which are believed to be mediated by the activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptors. Given recent findings of CB2 and GPR55 receptors in the brain, we examined whether these receptors are also involved in cannabinoid action.Experimental approachWe compared Δ9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9 -THC)-, WIN55212-2-, or XLR11-induced tetrad effects between wild-type (WT) and each genotype of CB1 -, CB2 - or GPR55-knockout (KO) mice and then observed the effects of antagonists of these receptors on these tetrad effects in WT mice.Key resultsSystemic administration of Δ9 -THC, WIN55212-2 or XLR11 produced dose-dependent tetrad effects in WT mice. Genetic deletion or pharmacological blockade of CB1 receptors abolished the tetrad effects produced by all three cannabinoids. Unexpectedly, genetic deletion of CB2 receptor abolished analgesia and catalepsy produced by Δ9 -THC or WIN55212-2, but not by XLR11. Microinjections of Δ9 -THC into the lateral ventricles also produced tetrad effects in WT, but not in CB1 -KO mice. CB2 -KO mice displayed a reduction in intraventricular Δ9 -THC-induced analgesia and catalepsy. In contrast to CB1 and CB2 receptors, genetic deletion of GPR55 receptors caused enhanced responses to Δ9 -THC or WIN55212-2. Antagonisim of CB1 , CB2 or GPR55 receptors produced alterations similar to those observed in each genotype mouse line.Conclusions and implicationsThese findings suggest that in addition to CB1 , both CB2 and GPR55 receptors are also involved in some pharmacological effects produced by cannabinoids. CB1 /CB2 , in contrast to GPR55, receptors appears to play opposite roles in cannabinoid action.
| S-EPMC7070166 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeClozapine is an atypical antipsychotic drug that is very efficacious in treating psychosis, but the risk of severe cardiotoxicity limits its clinical use. The present study investigated the harmful effects of clozapine on myocardium and assessed the involvement of cannabinoid receptors in its cardiotoxicity.Experimental approachClozapine alone or in combination with selective cannabinoid receptor antagonists or agonists were used to treat mice and cardiomyocytes.Key resultsClozapine induced myocardial inflammation and infiltration 7 days after i.p. injection. Mice survival rate and myocardial infiltration, and fibrotic lesions were dose-dependently worsened by clozapine. Clozapine decreased major endocannabinoid levels in sera and cultured cardiomyocytes. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors decreased in clozapine-treated hearts and were translocated from cytomembranes to cytoplasm and nuclei, whereas CB2 receptors increased in clozapine-treated hearts and inversely translocated from nuclei to the cytomembrane. Selective antagonists of CB1 receptors, rimonabant and AM281, but not its selective agonist arachidonyl-2'-chloroethylamide, ameliorated clozapine-induced myocardial inflammatory infiltration and fibrotic lesions. In contrast, selective agonists of CB2 receptors, AM1241 and JWH-133, but not its selective antagonist AM630, blunted clozapine-mediated cardiotoxicity in mice. In cultured cardiomyocytes, clozapine increased the pro-inflammatory factor IL-1β and the concentrations of myocardial injury markers (LDH and aspartate aminotransferase); these effects were reversed by either a CB1 antagonist or CB2 agonist and further prevented by combined pretreatments.Conclusions and implicationsOur data provide evidence that cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors have opposite effects and selective antagonists of CB1 or agonists of CB2 receptors might confer protective effects against clozapine in myocardium.
| S-EPMC6433645 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors (CB1R, CB2R) are members of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family that were identified over 20 years ago. CB1Rs and CB2Rs mediate the effects of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the principal psychoactive constituent of marijuana, and subsequently identified endogenous cannabinoids (endocannabinoids) anandamide and 2-arachidonoyl glycerol. CB1Rs and CB2Rs have both similarities and differences in their pharmacology. Both receptors recognize multiple classes of agonist and antagonist compounds and produce an array of distinct downstream effects. Natural polymorphisms and alternative splice variants may also contribute to their pharmacological diversity. As our knowledge of the distinct differences grows, we may be able to target select receptor conformations and their corresponding pharmacological responses. This chapter will discuss their pharmacological characterization, distribution, phylogeny, and signaling pathways. In addition, the effects of extended agonist exposure and how that affects signaling and expression patterns of the receptors are considered.
| S-EPMC5812699 | biostudies-literature
Project description:In the search for novel bitopic compounds targeting the dopamine D3 receptor (D3R), the N-(2,3-dichlorophenyl)piperazine nucleus (primary pharmacophore) has been linked to the 6,6- or 5,5-diphenyl-1,4-dioxane-2-carboxamide or the 1,4-benzodioxane-2-carboxamide scaffold (secondary pharmacophore) by an unsubstituted or 3-F-/3-OH-substituted butyl chain. This scaffold hybridization strategy led to the discovery of potent D3R-selective or multitarget ligands potentially useful for central nervous system disorders. In particular, the 6,6-diphenyl-1,4-dioxane derivative 3 showed a D3R-preferential profile, while an interesting multitarget behavior has been highlighted for the 5,5-diphenyl-1,4-dioxane and 1,4-benzodioxane derivatives 6 and 9, respectively, which displayed potent D2R antagonism, 5-HT1AR and D4R agonism, as well as potent D3R partial agonism. They also behaved as low-potency 5-HT2AR antagonists and 5-HT2CR partial agonists. Such a profile might be a promising starting point for the discovery of novel antipsychotic agents.
| S-EPMC8498988 | biostudies-literature