Dataset Information

Structural motifs in protein cores and at protein-protein interfaces are different.

ABSTRACT: Structures of proteins and protein-protein complexes are determined by the same physical principles and thus share a number of similarities. At the same time, there could be differences because in order to function, proteins interact with other molecules, undergo conformations changes, and so forth, which might impose different restraints on the tertiary versus quaternary structures. This study focuses on structural properties of protein-protein interfaces in comparison with the protein core, based on the wealth of currently available structural data and new structure-based approaches. The results showed that physicochemical characteristics, such as amino acid composition, residue-residue contact preferences, and hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity distributions, are similar in protein core and protein-protein interfaces. On the other hand, characteristics that reflect the evolutionary pressure, such as structural composition and packing, are largely different. The results provide important insight into fundamental properties of protein structure and function. At the same time, the results contribute to better understanding of the ways to dock proteins. Recent progress in predicting structures of individual proteins follows the advancement of deep learning techniques and new approaches to residue coevolution data. Protein core could potentially provide large amounts of data for application of the deep learning to docking. However, our results showed that the core motifs are significantly different from those at protein-protein interfaces, and thus may not be directly useful for docking. At the same time, such difference may help to overcome a major obstacle in application of the coevolutionary data to docking-discrimination of the intramolecular information not directly relevant to docking.

SUBMITTER: Hadarovich A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7784743 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Cyclization is commonly employed in efforts to improve the target binding affinity of peptide-based probes and therapeutics. Many structural motifs have been identified at protein-protein interfaces and provide promising targets for inhibitor design using cyclic peptides. Cyclized peptides are generally assumed to be rigidified relative to their linear counterparts. This rigidification potentially pre-organizes the molecules to interact properly with their targets. However, the actual impact of cyclization on, for example, peptide configurational entropy, is currently poorly understood in terms of both its magnitude and molecular-level origins. Moreover, even with thousands of desired structural motifs at hand, it is currently not possible to a priori identify the ones that are most promising to mimic using cyclic peptides nor to select the ideal linker length. Instead, labor-intensive chemical synthesis and experimental characterization of various cyclic peptide designs are required, in hopes of finding one with improved target affinity. Herein, using molecular dynamics simulations of polyglycines, we elucidated how head-to-tail cyclization impacts peptide backbone dihedral entropy and developed a simple strategy to rapidly screen for structures that can be reliably mimicked by preorganized cyclic peptides. As expected, cyclization generally led to a reduction in backbone dihedral entropy; notably, however, this effect was minimal when the length of polyglycines was >9 residues. We also found that the reduction in backbone dihedral entropy upon cyclization of small polyglycine peptides does not result from more restricted distributions of the dihedrals; rather, it was the correlations between specific dihedrals that caused the decrease in configurational entropy in the cyclic peptides. Using our comprehensive cyclo-Gn structural ensembles, we obtained a holistic picture of what conformations are accessible to cyclic peptides. Using "hot loops" recently identified at protein-protein interfaces as an example, we provide clear guidelines for choosing the "easiest" hot loops for cyclic peptides to mimic and for identifying appropriate cyclic peptide lengths. In conclusion, our results provide an understanding of the thermodynamics and structures of this interesting class of molecules. This information should prove particularly useful for designing cyclic peptide inhibitors of protein-protein interactions.

Dataset Information

Structural motifs in protein cores and at protein-protein interfaces are different.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets