Dataset Information

Rupture Risk Assessment for Cerebral Aneurysm Using Interpretable Machine Learning on Multidimensional Data

ABSTRACT: Background: Assessment of cerebral aneurysm rupture risk is an important task, but it remains challenging. Recent works applying machine learning to rupture risk evaluation presented positive results. Yet they were based on limited aspects of data, and lack of interpretability may limit their use in clinical setting. We aimed to develop interpretable machine learning models on multidimensional data for aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Methods: Three hundred seventy-four aneurysms were included in the study. Demographic, medical history, lifestyle behaviors, lipid profile, and morphologies were collected for each patient. Prediction models were derived using machine learning methods (support vector machine, artificial neural network, and XGBoost) and conventional logistic regression. The derived models were compared with the PHASES score method. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) analysis was applied to improve the interpretability of the best machine learning model and reveal the reasoning behind the predictions made by the model. Results: The best machine learning model (XGBoost) achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.882 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.838–0.927], significantly better than the logistic regression model (0.779; 95% CI = 0.729–0.829; P = 0.002) and the PHASES score method (0.758; 95% CI = 0.713–0.800; P = 0.001). Location, size ratio, and triglyceride level were the three most important features in predicting rupture. Two typical cases were analyzed to demonstrate the interpretability of the model. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the potential of using machine learning for aneurysm rupture risk assessment. Machine learning models performed better than conventional statistical model and the PHASES score method. The SHAP analysis can improve the interpretability of machine learning models and facilitate their use in a clinical setting.

SUBMITTER: Ou C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7785850 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background and Purpose: Precisely assessing the likelihood of an intracranial aneurysm rupturing is critical for guiding clinical decision-making. The objective of this study is to construct and validate a deep learning framework utilizing point clouds to forecast the likelihood of aneurysm rupturing. Methods: The dataset included in this study consisted of a total of 623 aneurysms, with 211 of them classified as ruptured and 412 as unruptured, which were obtained from two separate projects within the AneuX morphology database. The HUG project, which included 124 ruptured aneurysms and 340 unruptured aneurysms, was used to train and internally validate the model. For external validation, another project named @neurIST was used, which included 87 ruptured and 72 unruptured aneurysms. A standardized method was employed to isolate aneurysms and a segment of their parent vessels from the original 3D vessel models. These models were then converted into a point cloud format using open3d package to facilitate training of the deep learning network. The PointNet++ architecture was utilized to process the models and generate risk scores through a softmax layer. Finally, two models, the dome and cut1 model, were established and then subjected to a comprehensive comparison of statistical indices with the LASSO regression model built by the dataset authors. Results: The cut1 model outperformed the dome model in the 5-fold cross-validation, with the mean AUC values of 0.85 and 0.81, respectively. Furthermore, the cut1 model beat the morphology-based LASSO regression model with an AUC of 0.82. However, as the original dataset authors stated, we observed potential generalizability concerns when applying trained models to datasets with different selection biases. Nevertheless, our method outperformed the LASSO regression model in terms of generalizability, with an AUC of 0.71 versus 0.67. Conclusion: The point cloud, as a 3D visualization technique for intracranial aneurysms, can effectively capture the spatial contour and morphological aspects of aneurysms. More structural features between the aneurysm and its parent vessels can be exposed by keeping a portion of the parent vessels, enhancing the model's performance. The point cloud-based deep learning model exhibited good performance in predicting rupture risk while also facing challenges in generalizability.

Project description:BackgroundPapillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is one of the most common endocrine malignancies with different risk levels. However, preoperative risk assessment of PTC is still a challenge in the worldwide. Here, we first report a Preoperative Risk Assessment Classifier for PTC (PRAC-PTC) by multidimensional features including clinical indicators, immune indices, genetic feature, and proteomics.Materials and methodsThe 558 patients collected from June 2013 to November 2020 were allocated to three groups: discovery set (274 patients, 274 FFPE), retrospective test set (166 patients, 166 FFPE) and prospective test set (118 patients, 118 FNA). Proteomic profiling was conducted by formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) tissues from the patients. Preoperative clinical information and blood immunological indices were collected. The BRAFV600E mutation were detected by the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS).ResultsWe developed a machine learning model of 17 variables based on multidimensional features of 274 PTC patients from a retrospective cohort. The PRAC-PTC achieved areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.925 in the discovery set and validated externally by blinded analyses in a retrospective cohort of 166 PTC patients (0.787 AUC) and a prospective cohort of 118 PTC patients (0.799 AUC) from two independent clinical centres. Meanwhile, the preoperative predictive risk effectiveness of clinicians was improved with the assistance of PRAC-PTC, and the accuracies reached at 84.4% (95% CI 82.9-84.4) and 83.5% (95% CI 82.2-84.2) in the retrospective and prospective test sets, respectively.ConclusionThis study demonstrated that the PRAC-PTC that integrating clinical data, gene mutation information, immune indices, high-throughput proteomics and machine learning technology in multi-centre retrospective and prospective clinical cohorts can effectively stratify the preoperative risk of PTC and may decrease unnecessary surgery or overtreatment.

Dataset Information

Rupture Risk Assessment for Cerebral Aneurysm Using Interpretable Machine Learning on Multidimensional Data

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets