Dataset Information

FVIII activity following FVIII protein infusion or FVIII gene transfer predicts the bleeding risk in hemophilia A rats.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Prophylactic replacement therapy in hemophilia A (HA) patients does not adequately prevent bleeds and arthropathic complications. A more refined understanding of the relationship between coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) levels and bleeding risk during protein prophylaxis, or with gene therapy, is needed to improve patient care.

Objectives

Investigate this relationship in the HA rat, a model exhibiting spontaneous bleeds and development of arthropathy similar to HA patients.

Methods

Human B domain-deleted FVIII was delivered to HA rats via adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated gene transfer or multiple intravenous protein injections.

Results and conclusions

After 12 weeks of observation, both approaches significantly reduced bleeds per animal and increased the proportion of bleed-free animals compared with controls (43% vs 0%, respectively [AAV]; 75% vs 8%, respectively [injection]). Both approaches resulted in an anti-FVIII inhibitory response in 20% to 37% of treated animals, similar to HA patients. Inhibitory antibodies were refractory to clinical improvement (reduction of bleeds) only in the AAV-based prophylaxis. An integrated model-based analysis of data on FVIII exposure and bleeding events was performed. This predicted the bleeding risk at any given circulating FVIII activity. Specifically, 4.8 or 10 IU/dL FVIII (0.048 and 0.1 IU/mL, respectively) were predicted to reduce bleeding risk by 90% or 95%, respectively, compared with untreated controls. Our data establish the utility of the HA rat model in FVIII prophylaxis studies and describe how FVIII activity affects bleeding risk in this setting. These enable further studies on FVIII prophylaxis focusing on disease complications for an optimized treatment of HA patients.

SUBMITTER: Lovgren KM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7786582 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Aim: To assess platelet (PLT) function and bleeding risks in patients with acute coronary syndrome after tirofiban infusion. Methods: Patients diagnosed with acute coronary syndrome from May 2016 to February 2018 in the Department of Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Zhongshan Hospital, were enrolled. They were symmetrically allocated into two groups: tirofiban treatment group or control group (without tirofiban treatment). Blood samples were collected 24 h postoperation for the evaluation of antiplatelet effect of tirofiban. We applied thromboelastography to detect on-treatment PLT reactivity and conducted laboratory tests to assess the risk of bleeding following tirofiban treatment. After discharge, telephone follow-up and outpatient interview were carried out. The primary clinical endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events, including cardiovascular death, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization for the targeted vascular lesion. Results: There were a total of 196 patients with acute coronary syndrome after screening with the inclusion criteria and the exclusion criteria. Ninety-eight patients were assigned to receive either tirofiban treatment or control treatment. Patients treated with tirofiban had more coronary lesions and stents implanted compared with the control group (P = 0.000). After tirofiban infusion, inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by thromboxane A2 and adenosine diphosphate was significantly higher compared to patients without tirofiban infusion (80.3% ± 19.6% vs. 72.6% ± 13.0%, P = 0.002; and 81.0% ± 19.8% vs. 75.4% ± 12.4%, P = 0.020, respectively). There was no significant difference in the reduction of hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), and PLT after administration of tirofiban, compared with baseline (P > 0.05). In addition, no significant differences were identified between the two groups with respect to Hb, Hct, and PLT after tirofiban infusion. However, C-reactive protein level, referred to as an inflammation marker, was significantly lowered after infusion tirofiban compared with the control group (11.9 ± 14.2 vs. 17.9 ± 21.2, P = 0.020). During the 1-year follow-up, the incidence rate of major adverse cardiovascular events remains indiscriminate between the two groups (P = 0.208). The assessments of cardiac biomarkers showed that tirofiban could decrease incidence of procedural myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR] = 0.250, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.067-0.925, P = 0.027). At follow-up, the morbidity of left atrial dilation in tirofiban-treated patients, defined as enlargement of left atrial diameter >40mm, was lower compared to the control group (OR = 0.533, 95% CI = 0.301-0.945, P = 0.031). Conclusion: Tirofiban infusion could decrease PLT activation in patients with acute coronary syndrome without increasing the risk of bleeding. As a concomitant medication, tirofiban shows no benefit in reducing the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events.

Project description:Essentials Platelet-specific FVIII gene therapy is effective in hemophilia A mice even with inhibitors. The impact of platelet adherence via VWF/GPIb? binding on platelet gene therapy was investigated. GPIb? does not significantly affect platelet gene therapy of hemophilia A with inhibitors. Platelet gene therapy induces immune tolerance in hemophilia A mice with pre-existing immunity. SUMMARY: Background We have previously demonstrated that von Willebrand factor (VWF) is essential in platelet-specific FVIII (2bF8) gene therapy of hemophilia A (HA) with inhibitory antibodies (inhibitors). At the site of injury, platelet adherence is initiated by VWF binding to the platelet GPIb complex. Objective To investigate the impact of GPIb? on platelet gene therapy of HA with inhibitors. Methods Platelet-FVIII expression was introduced by 2bF8 lentivirus (2bF8LV) transduction of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) from GPIb?null (Ibnull ) mice or rhF8-primed FVIIInull (F8null ) mice followed by transplantation into lethally irradiated rhF8-primed F8null recipients. Animals were analyzed by flow cytometry, FVIII assays and the tail bleeding test. Results After transplantation, 99% of platelets were derived from donors. The macrothrombocytopenia phenotype was maintained in F8null mice that received 2bF8LV-transduced Ibnull HSCs (2bF8-Ibnull /F8null ). The platelet-FVIII expression level in 2bF8-Ibnull /F8null recipients was similar to that obtained from F8null mice that received 2bF8LV-transduced F8null HSCs (2bF8-F8null /F8null ). The tail bleeding test showed that the remaining hemoglobin level in the 2bF8-Ibnull /F8null group was significantly higher than in the F8null control group, but there was no significant difference between the 2bF8-Ibnull /F8null and 2bF8-F8null /F8null groups. The half-life of inhibitor disappearance time was comparable between the 2bF8-Ibnull /F8null and 2bF8-F8null /F8null groups. The rhF8 re-challenge did not elicit a memory immune response once inhibitor titers dropped to undetectable levels after 2bF8 gene therapy. Conclusion GPIb? does not significantly impact platelet gene therapy of HA with inhibitors. 2bF8 gene therapy restores hemostasis and promotes immune tolerance in HA mice with pre-existing immunity.