Density of surface charge is a more predictive factor of the toxicity of cationic carbon nanoparticles than zeta potential.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A positive surface charge has been largely associated with nanoparticle (NP) toxicity. However, by screening a carbon NP library in macrophages, we found that a cationic charge does not systematically translate into toxicity. To get deeper insight into this, we carried out a comprehensive study on 5 cationic carbon NPs (NP2 to NP6) exhibiting a similar zeta (?) potential value (from +?20.6 to +?26.9 mV) but displaying an increasing surface charge density (electrokinetic charge, Q_ek from 0.23 to 4.39 µmol/g). An anionic and non-cytotoxic NP (NP1, ?-potential = -?38.5 mV) was used as control.

Results

The 5 cationic NPs induced high (NP6 and NP5, Q_ek of 2.95 and 4.39 µmol/g, respectively), little (NP3 and NP4, Q_ek of 0.78 and 1.35 µmol/g, respectively) or no (NP2, Q_ek of 0.23 µmol/g) viability loss in THP-1-derived macrophages exposed for 24 h to escalating NP dose (3 to 200 µg/mL). A similar toxicity trend was observed in airway epithelial cells (A549 and Calu-3), with less viability loss than in THP-1 cells. NP3, NP5 and NP6 were taken up by THP-1 cells at 4 h, whereas NP1, NP2 and NP4 were not. Among the 6 NPs, only NP5 and NP6 with the highest surface charge density induced significant oxidative stress, IL-8 release, mitochondrial dysfunction and loss in lysosomal integrity in THP-1 cells. As well, in mice, NP5 and NP6 only induced airway inflammation. NP5 also increased allergen-induced immune response, airway inflammation and mucus production.

Conclusions

Thus, this study clearly reveals that the surface charge density of a cationic carbon NP rather than the absolute value of its ?-potential is a relevant descriptor of its in vitro and in vivo toxicity.

SUBMITTER: Weiss M 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7789233 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature