Dataset Information

Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Heart Failure in Germany: A Cost-Utility Analysis of the Additional Defibrillator.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is a well-established form of treatment for patients with heart failure and cardiac dyssynchrony. There are two different types of CRT devices: the biventricular pacemaker (CRT-P) and the biventricular defibrillator (CRT-D). The latter is more complex but also more expensive. For the majority of patients who are eligible for CRT, both devices are appropriate according to current guidelines. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-utility analysis for CRT-D compared to CRT-P from a German payer's perspective.

Methods

A cohort Markov-model was developed to assess average costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) for CRT-D and CRT-P. The model consisted of six stages: one for the device implementation, one for the absorbing state death, and two stages ("Stable" and "Hospital") for either a CRT device or medical therapy. The time horizon was 20 years. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were conducted.

Results

The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CRT-D compared with CRT-P was €24,659 per additional QALY gained. In deterministic sensitivity analysis, the survival advantage of CRT-D to CRT-P was the most influential input parameter. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis 96% of the simulated cases were more effective but also more costly.

Conclusions

Therapy with CRT-D compared to CRT-P resulted in an additional gain of QALYs, but was more expensive. In addition, the ICER was subject to uncertainty, especially due to the uncertainty in the survival benefit. A randomised controlled trial and subgroup analyses would be desirable to further inform decision making.

SUBMITTER: Hadwiger M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7790776 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Heart Failure in Germany: A Cost-Utility Analysis of the Additional Defibrillator.

Hadwiger Moritz M Frielitz Fabian-Simon FS Eisemann Nora N Elsner Christian C Dagres Nikolaos N Hindricks Gerhard G Katalinic Alexander A

Applied health economics and health policy 20210101 1

<h4>Background</h4>Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) is a well-established form of treatment for patients with heart failure and cardiac dyssynchrony. There are two different types of CRT devices: the biventricular pacemaker (CRT-P) and the biventricular defibrillator (CRT-D). The latter is more complex but also more expensive. For the majority of patients who are eligible for CRT, both devices are appropriate according to current guidelines. The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost ...[more]

PMID: 32215877

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe purpose is to perform a cost effectiveness analysis amniotic membrane vs. topical medications in the use of treating dry eye disease. A cost effectiveness analysis comparing amniotic membrane + other topical medications to topical cyclosporine A + other topical medications was evaluated using accepted decision tree modeling software.MethodsTreeAge Pro 2019 software was used to evaluate the base case costs over a one year timeframe. Sensitivity analysis was performed on those variables which had the greatest effect on choosing one therapy versus the other based on cost. Monte Carlo simulation was run 1,000 times to determine the most effective, least costly alternative. Costs were evaluated from a societal level (direct + indirect). Quality of life utility scores were evaluated using known time tradeoffs from prior studies (scale 0-1; with 1 being perfect vision).ResultsOver a one year timeframe, the base case demonstrated that amniotic membrane + topical medications was the less expensive alternative and provided for incremental utilities versus topical cyclosporine + other medications (Cost/utility: $18,275/0.78 vs. $20,740/0.74). If examining direct costs only, topical cyclosporine was the least expensive option over a one year timeframe: $4,112 vs. $10,300. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that in order for topical cyclosporine to be the less expensive alternative the following variables would need to be: < 68 days productivity lost; < $161 productivity lost/day; > 79% of amniotic membrane implants would need to be re-implanted at month 4 (for whatever reason); > $2677 per amniotic membrane implant procedure (Medicare reimbursement rate); > 96% positive response to topical cyclosporine A at month 4; > 58% positive response to topical cyclosporine A at month 6 and; < 54% probability clinical improvement with amniotic membrane. Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated that amniotic membrane was the less costly, most effective alternative 91.5% of the time.ConclusionBased on improved outcomes using amniotic membrane, patient productivity was improved resulting in lower societal costs (less days lost from work). When considering the untoward effects of dry eye disease on societal costs, an improvement of the dry eye disease condition was accomplished most often with amniotic membrane.

Project description:ImportanceThyroid eye disease (TED) results in varying degrees of proptosis and diplopia negatively affecting quality of life (QoL), producing possibly substantial visual changes, disfigurement, and disability.ObjectiveTo determine the association of varying TED severities with QoL in a non-TED population by assessing health state utility scores.Design, setting, and participantsThis qualitative study, conducted from April 20, 2020, to April 29, 2021, assessed health states for active, moderate-severe TED, and values were elicited using time trade-off methods. Six health states of varying severity were determined from 2 placebo-controlled clinical trials (171 patients with TED and clinical activity score ≥4, ±diplopia/proptosis) and refined using interviews with US patients with TED (n = 6). Each health state description was validated by interviews with additional TED patient advocates (n = 3) and physician experts (n = 3). Health state descriptions and a QOL questionnaire were piloted and administered to a general population. Visual analog scales (VASs) were also administered to detect concurrence of the findings.Main outcomes and measuresTED health state utility scores and whether they differ from one another were assessed using Shapiro-Wilk, Kruskal-Wallis, pairwise Wilcoxon rank sum, and paired t tests.ResultsA total of 111 participants completed time trade-off interviews. The mean (SD) utility value was 0.44 (0.34). The lowest (worse) mean utility value was observed in the most severe disease state (constant diplopia/large proptosis) with 0.30 (95% CI, 0.24-0.36), followed by constant diplopia/small proptosis (0.34; 95% CI, 0.29-0.40), intermittent or inconstant diplopia/large proptosis (0.43; 95% CI, 0.36-0.49), no diplopia/large proptosis (0.46; 95% CI, 0.40-0.52), and intermittent or inconstant diplopia/small proptosis (0.52; 95% CI, 0.45-0.58). The highest (best) mean value, 0.60 (95% CI, 0.54-0.67), was observed for the least severe disease state (no diplopia/small proptosis).Conclusions and relevanceThese findings suggest that patients with active, moderate-severe TED may have substantial disutility, with increasing severity of proptosis/diplopia more likely to have detrimental associations with QoL. These health state scores may provide a baseline for determining QoL improvement in these TED health states (utility gains) treated with new therapies.

Dataset Information

Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Heart Failure in Germany: A Cost-Utility Analysis of the Additional Defibrillator.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy in Patients with Moderate to Severe Heart Failure in Germany: A Cost-Utility Analysis of the Additional Defibrillator.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets