Dataset Information

Hospital-level intensive care unit admission for patients with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injury.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The optimal level of care for hemodynamically stable patients with isolated blunt hepatic, renal, or splenic injuries (solid organ injuries [SOIs]) is unknown. We sought to characterize interhospital variability in intensive care unit (ICU) admission of such patients and to determine whether greater hospital-level ICU use would be associated with improved outcomes.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2015 and 2016 National Trauma Data Bank. We included adult patients with blunt trauma with SOIs with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of 2 to 4. We excluded patients with other significant injuries, hypotension, or another indication for ICU admission, and hospitals with less than 10 eligible patients. We categorized hospitals into quartiles based on the proportion of eligible patients admitted to an ICU. The primary outcome was a composite of organ failure (cardiac arrest, acute lung injury/acute respiratory failure, or acute kidney injury), infection (sepsis, pneumonia, or catheter-related blood stream infection), or death during hospitalization.

Results

Among 14,312 patients at 444 facilities, 7,225 (50%), 5,050 (35%), and 3,499 (24%) had splenic, hepatic, and renal injuries, respectively. The median proportion of ICU use was 44% (interquartile range, 27-59%, range 0-95%). The composite outcome occurred in 180 patients (1.3%), with death in 76 (0.5%), organ failure in 97 (0.7%), and infection in 53 (0.4%). Relative to hospitals with the lowest ICU use (quartile 1), greater hospital-level ICU use was not associated with decreased likelihood of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratios, 1.31; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.88-1.95; 0.81; 95% CI, 0.52-1.26; and 0.94; 95% CI, 0.62-1.43 for quartiles 2-4, respectively) or its components. Unplanned ICU transfer was no more likely with lower hospital-level ICU use.

Conclusion

Admission location of stable patients with isolated mild to moderate abdominal SOIs is variable across hospitals, but hospitalization at a facility with greater ICU use is not associated with substantially improved outcomes.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic/care management, Level IV.

SUBMITTER: Bowman JA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7799854 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Hospital-level intensive care unit admission for patients with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injury.

Bowman Jessica A JA Jurkovich Gregory J GJ Nuño Miriam M Utter Garth H GH

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery 20200301 3

<h4>Background</h4>The optimal level of care for hemodynamically stable patients with isolated blunt hepatic, renal, or splenic injuries (solid organ injuries [SOIs]) is unknown. We sought to characterize interhospital variability in intensive care unit (ICU) admission of such patients and to determine whether greater hospital-level ICU use would be associated with improved outcomes.<h4>Methods</h4>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the 2015 and 2016 National Trauma Data Bank. We in ...[more]

PMID: 31923050

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe optimal level of care for older patients with rib fractures as an isolated injury is unknown.ObjectivesTo characterize interhospital variability in intensive care unit (ICU) vs non-ICU admission of older patients with isolated rib fractures and to evaluate whether greater hospital-level use of ICU admission is associated with improved outcomes.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study included trauma patients aged 65 years and older with isolated rib fractures who were admitted to US trauma centers participating in the National Trauma Data Bank between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016. Patients were excluded if they had other significant injuries, were intubated or had assisted respirations in the emergency department (ED), or had a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of less than 9 in the ED. Hospitals with fewer than 10 eligible patients were excluded. Data analysis was conducted from May 2019 through September 2020.ExposuresAdmission to the ICU.Main outcomes and measuresComposite of unplanned intubation, pneumonia, or death during hospitalization.ResultsAmong 23 951 patients (11 066 [46.2%] women; mean [SD] age, 77.0 [7.2] years) at 573 hospitals, the median (interquartile range) proportion of ICU use was 16.7% (7.4%-32.0%), but this varied from a low of 0% to a high of 91.9%. The composite outcome occurred in 787 patients (3.3%), with unplanned intubation in 317 (1.3%), pneumonia in 180 (0.8%), and death in 451 (1.9%). Accounting for the hierarchical nature of the data and adjusting for propensity scores reflecting factors associated with ICU admission, receiving care at a hospital with the greatest ICU use (quartile 4), compared with a hospital with the lowest ICU use, was associated with decreased likelihood of the composite outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.92).Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, admission location of older patients with isolated rib fractures was variable across hospitals, but hospitalization at a center with greater ICU use was associated with improved outcomes. It may be warranted for hospitals with low ICU use to admit more such patients to an ICU.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Regionalization of trauma care is a national priority and hospitalization for blunt abdominal trauma, which may include transfer, is common among children. The objective of this study was to determine whether there were differences in mortality, treatment, or length of stay between patients treated at or transferred to a higher level trauma center and those not transferred and admitted to a lower level trauma center. METHODS:Cohort from Washington state trauma registry from 2000 to 2014 of patients 16 years or younger with isolated Grade I-III spleen, liver, or kidney injury. RESULTS:Among 54,034 patients 16 years or younger, the trauma registry captured 1177 (2.2%) patients with isolated low grade solid organ injuries; 226 (19.2%) presented to a higher level trauma center, 600 (51.0%) presented to a lower level trauma center and stayed there for care, and 351 (29.8%) were transferred to a higher level trauma center. Forty (3.4%) patients underwent an abdominal operation. Among the 950 patients evaluated initially at a lower level trauma center, the risk of surgery did not differ significantly between those who were not transferred compared to those who were (relative risk, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-6.01). The risk of total splenectomy was no different for patients who stayed at a lower level trauma center compared with those who were transferred to a higher level trauma center (RR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.33-2.16). Nontransferred patients had a 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.45-0.88) times lower risk of staying in the hospital for an additional day compared with patients who were transferred to a higher level trauma center. One patient died. CONCLUSION:Few pediatric patients with isolated low grade blunt solid organ injury require intervention and thus may not need to be transferred; trauma systems should revise their transfer policies. Prevention of unnecessary transfers is an opportunity for cost savings in pediatric trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:Therapeutic/Care management, level III.

Dataset Information

Hospital-level intensive care unit admission for patients with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injury.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence

Publications

Hospital-level intensive care unit admission for patients with isolated blunt abdominal solid organ injury.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets