Dataset Information

The Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Postoperative delirium is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. However, whether intravenous and inhalation anesthetics are associated with different risks of postoperative delirium remains unknown.

Objective

We set up to determine the incidence and duration of postoperative delirium in older patients who had surgery under the intravenous anesthetic propofol or the inhalational anesthetic sevoflurane.

Methods

Participants were patients who had total hip/knee replacements and were randomized to propofol (N?=?106) or sevoflurane (N?=?103) anesthesia group. The Confusion Assessment Method was employed by investigators who were blinded to the anesthesia regimen to assess the incidence and duration (days of postoperative delirium per person) of postoperative delirium on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3.

Results

A total of 209 participants (71.2±6.7 years old, 29.2% male) were included in the final data analysis. The incidence of postoperative delirium was 33.0% with propofol anesthesia and 23.3% with sevoflurane anesthesia (p?=?0.119, Chi-square test), and we estimated that we would need 316 participants in each arm to detect a potential statistically significant difference. Days of postoperative delirium per person were higher in the propofol (0.5±0.8) anesthesia group compared to the sevoflurane anesthesia group (0.3±0.5, p?=?0.049, Student's t-test).

Conclusion

This pilot study established a system to compare effects of different anesthetics and generated a hypothesis that propofol trended to have a higher incidence and had longer duration of postoperative delirium than sevoflurane. Additional studies with a larger sample size are needed to test this hypothesis.

SUBMITTER: Mei X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7844419 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

Mei Xinchun X Zheng Hai-Lin HL Li Cheng C Ma Xin X Zheng Hui H Marcantonio Edward E Xie Zhongcong Z Shen Yuan Y

Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD 20200101 4

<h4>Background</h4>Postoperative delirium is associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. However, whether intravenous and inhalation anesthetics are associated with different risks of postoperative delirium remains unknown.<h4>Objective</h4>We set up to determine the incidence and duration of postoperative delirium in older patients who had surgery under the intravenous anesthetic propofol or the inhalational anesthetic sevoflurane.<h4>Methods</h4>Participants were patients who had total hip ...[more]

PMID: 32651322

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePostoperative delirium is common following cardiac surgery and may be affected by choice of analgesic and sedative.ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of postoperative intravenous (IV) acetaminophen (paracetamol) vs placebo combined with IV propofol vs dexmedetomidine on postoperative delirium among older patients undergoing cardiac surgery.Design, setting, and participantsRandomized, placebo-controlled, factorial clinical trial among 120 patients aged 60 years or older undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery or combined CABG/valve surgeries at a US center. Enrollment was September 2015 to April 2018, with follow-up ending in April 2019.InterventionsPatients were randomized to 1 of 4 groups receiving postoperative analgesia with IV acetaminophen or placebo every 6 hours for 48 hours and postoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine or propofol starting at chest closure and continued for up to 6 hours (acetaminophen and dexmedetomidine: n = 29; placebo and dexmedetomidine: n = 30; acetaminophen and propofol: n = 31; placebo and propofol: n = 30).Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was incidence of postoperative in-hospital delirium by the Confusion Assessment Method. Secondary outcomes included delirium duration, cognitive decline, breakthrough analgesia within the first 48 hours, and ICU and hospital length of stay.ResultsAmong 121 patients randomized (median age, 69 years; 19 women [15.8%]), 120 completed the trial. Patients treated with IV acetaminophen had a significant reduction in delirium (10% vs 28% placebo; difference, -18% [95% CI, -32% to -5%]; P = .01; HR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.1-7.8]). Patients receiving dexmedetomidine vs propofol had no significant difference in delirium (17% vs 21%; difference, -4% [95% CI, -18% to 10%]; P = .54; HR, 0.8 [95% CI, 0.4-1.9]). There were significant differences favoring acetaminophen vs placebo for 3 prespecified secondary outcomes: delirium duration (median, 1 vs 2 days; difference, -1 [95% CI, -2 to 0]), ICU length of stay (median, 29.5 vs 46.7 hours; difference, -16.7 [95% CI, -20.3 to -0.8]), and breakthrough analgesia (median, 322.5 vs 405.3 µg morphine equivalents; difference, -83 [95% CI, -154 to -14]). For dexmedetomidine vs propofol, only breakthrough analgesia was significantly different (median, 328.8 vs 397.5 µg; difference, -69 [95% CI, -155 to -4]; P = .04). Fourteen patients in both the placebo-dexmedetomidine and acetaminophen-propofol groups (46% and 45%) and 7 in the acetaminophen-dexmedetomidine and placebo-propofol groups (24% and 23%) had hypotension.Conclusions and relevanceAmong older patients undergoing cardiac surgery, postoperative scheduled IV acetaminophen, combined with IV propofol or dexmedetomidine, reduced in-hospital delirium vs placebo. Additional research, including comparison of IV vs oral acetaminophen and other potentially opioid-sparing analgesics, on the incidence of postoperative delirium is warranted.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02546765.

Project description:BackgroundMaintaining adequate perioperative hepatic blood flow (HBF) supply is essential for preservation of postoperative normal liver function. Propofol and sevoflurane affect arterial and portal HBF. Previous studies have suggested that propofol increases total HBF, primarily by increasing portal HBF, while sevoflurane has only minimal effect on total HBF. Primary objective was to compare the effect of propofol (group P) and sevoflurane (group S) on arterial, portal and total HBF and on the caval and portal vein pressure during major abdominal surgery. The study was performed in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy because - in contrast to hepatic surgical procedures - this is a standardized surgical procedure without potential anticipated severe hemodynamic disturbances, and it allows direct access to the hepatic blood vessels.MethodsPatients were randomized according to the type of anesthetic drug used. For both groups, Bispectral Index (BIS) monitoring was used to monitor depth of anesthesia. All patients received goal-directed hemodynamic therapy (GDHT) guided by the transpulmonary thermodilution technique. Hemodynamic data were measured, recorded and guided by Pulsioflex™. Arterial, portal and total HBF were measured directly, using ultrasound transit time flow measurements (TTFM) and were related to hemodynamic variables.ResultsEighteen patients were included. There was no significant difference between groups in arterial, portal and total HBF. As a result of the GDHT, pre-set hemodynamic targets were obtained in both groups, but MAP was significantly lower in group S (p = 0.01). In order to obtain these pre-set hemodynamic targets, group S necessitated a significantly higher need for vasopressor support (p < 0.01).ConclusionHepatic blood flow was similar under a propofol-based and a sevoflurane-based anesthetic regimen. Related to the application of GDHT, pre-set hemodynamic goals were maintained in both groups, but sevoflurane-anaesthetized patients had a significantly higher need for vasopressor support.Trial registrationStudy protocol number is AGO/2017/002 - EC/2017/0164. EudraCT number is 2017-000071-90. Clin.trail.gov, NCT03772106 , Registered 4/12/2018, retrospective registered.

Project description:ImportancePostoperative delirium is the most common complication following major surgery in older patients. Intraoperative sedation levels are a possible modifiable risk factor for postoperative delirium.ObjectiveTo determine whether limiting sedation levels during spinal anesthesia reduces incident delirium overall.Design, setting, and participantsThis double-blind randomized clinical trial (A Strategy to Reduce the Incidence of Postoperative Delirum in Elderly Patients [STRIDE]) was conducted from November 18, 2011, to May 19, 2016, at a single academic medical center and included a consecutive sample of older patients (≥65 years) who were undergoing nonelective hip fracture repair with spinal anesthesia and propofol sedation. Patients were excluded for preoperative delirium or severe dementia. Of 538 hip fractures screened, 225 patients (41.8%) were eligible, 10 (1.9%) declined participation, 15 (2.8%) became ineligible between the time of consent and surgery, and 200 (37.2%) were randomized. The follow-up included postoperative days 1 to 5 or until hospital discharge.InterventionsHeavier (modified observer's assessment of sedation score of 0-2) or lighter (observer's assessment of sedation score of 3-5) propofol sedation levels intraoperatively.Main outcomes and measuresDelirium on postoperative days 1 to 5 or until hospital discharge determined via consensus panel using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition, Text Revision) criteria. The incidence of delirium was compared between intervention groups with and without stratification by the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).ResultsOf 200 participants, the mean (SD) age was 82 (8) years, 146 (73%) were women, 194 (97%) were white, and the mean (SD) CCI was 1.5 (1.8). One hundred participants each were randomized to receive lighter sedation levels or heavier sedation levels. A good separation of intraoperative sedation levels was confirmed by multiple indices. The overall incident delirium risk was 36.5% (n = 73) and 39% (n = 39) vs 34% (n = 34) in heavier and lighter sedation groups, respectively (P = .46). Intention-to-treat analyses indicated no statistically significant difference between groups in the risk of incident delirium (log-rank test χ2, 0.46; P = .46). However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, when stratified by CCI, sedation levels did effect the delirium risk (P for interaction = .04); in low comorbid states (CCI = 0), heavier vs lighter sedation levels doubled the risk of delirium (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1- 4.9). The level of sedation did not affect delirium risk with a CCI of more than 0.Conclusions and relevanceIn the primary analysis, limiting the level of sedation provided no significant benefit in reducing incident delirium. However, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, lighter sedation levels benefitted reducing postoperative delirium for persons with a CCI of 0.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00590707.

Project description:ObjectiveGeneral anesthesia can disturb the hormone levels in surgical patients. Hormone deficiency is one of the major symptoms of craniopharyngioma (CP) in pediatric patients. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled clinical study is to evaluate whether propofol and sevoflurane influence the perioperative hormone levels in these patients and to determine which anesthesia technique causes less impact on hormone levels.MaterialsSixty-four ASA I and II pediatric patients with CP undergoing elective neurosurgery were randomly divided into the sevoflurane group (S group, n = 32) and the propofol group (P group, n = 32). Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane and propofol until the end of the operation. Demographic information, operation information and hemodynamic variables were recorded. The levels of hormones were evaluated preoperatively as the baseline (T0), 1h after the beginning of the operation (T1), immediately at the end of the operation (T2) and 72 h postoperatively (T3).ResultsThere were no significant differences in the two groups in terms of patients' demographics and intraoperative information, such as operation duration, blood loss and transfusion volumes, and fluid infusion volume (P>0.05). In both groups, compared to those at T0, the levels of TSH, FT3, TT3 and ACTH at T1, T2 and T3 were significantly lower. The levels of FSH, PRL and GH at T3 were also significantly lower (P<0.05). The FT3 and TT3 levels of both groups at T2 and T3 were significantly lower than those at T1, but the ACTH level was significantly increased (P<0.05). Compared to the levels at T2, the TSH, FT3, FT4 and ACTH levels of the two groups at T3 were significantly reduced (P<0.05). The baseline hormone levels of both groups were similar (P>0.05). At T1, the FT3, TT3, FT4, TT4 and ACTH levels in the P group were significantly lower than those in the S group (P<0.05). At T2, the TT3 and ACTH levels of the P group were significantly lower than those of the S group (P<0.05) At T3, the TT4 level in the P group was significantly lower than that of the S group (P<0.05).ConclusionPropofol and sevoflurane could reduce the levels of hormones intraoperatively and postoperatively in pediatric patients with craniopharyngioma. However, propofol reduced hormone levels more intensively, mainly intraoperatively. Postoperatively, propofol and sevoflurane had similar inhibition effects on the shift in hormone levels. Therefore, in pediatric patients with craniopharyngioma undergoing neurosurgery, sevoflurane might be the preferred anesthetic because it causes less interruption of hormone levels. However, because of their similar postoperative effects, which long-term effects of sevoflurane or propofol could produce optimal clinical situations? Thus more extensive clinical studies are needed.Trial registrationClinical trial registration. This trail was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn, Jun Xiong) on 28/12/2021, registration number was ChiCTR2100054885.

Dataset Information

The Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The Effects of Propofol and Sevoflurane on Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets