Dataset Information

Battery lifetime prediction and performance assessment of different modeling approaches.

ABSTRACT: Lithium-ion battery technologies have conquered the current energy storage market as the most preferred choice thanks to their development in a longer lifetime. However, choosing the most suitable battery aging modeling methodology based on investigated lifetime characterization is still a challenge. In this work, a comprehensive aging dataset of nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide (NMC) cell is used to develop and/or train different capacity fade models to compare output responses. The assessment is conducted for semi-empirical modeling (SeM) approach against a machine learning model and an artificial neural network model. Among all, the nonlinear autoregressive network (NARXnet) can predict the capacity degradation most precisely minimizing the computational effort as well. This research work signifies the importance of lifetime methodological choice and model performance in understanding the complex and nonlinear Li-ion battery aging behavior.

SUBMITTER: Hosen MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7851188 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Battery lifetime prediction and performance assessment of different modeling approaches.

Hosen Md Sazzad MS Jaguemont Joris J Van Mierlo Joeri J Berecibar Maitane M

iScience 20210119 2

Lithium-ion battery technologies have conquered the current energy storage market as the most preferred choice thanks to their development in a longer lifetime. However, choosing the most suitable battery aging modeling methodology based on investigated lifetime characterization is still a challenge. In this work, a comprehensive aging dataset of nickel-manganese-cobalt oxide (NMC) cell is used to develop and/or train different capacity fade models to compare output responses. The assessment is ...[more]

PMID: 33554066

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPhysicians need to inform asymptomatic individuals about personalized outcomes of statin therapy for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, current prediction models focus on short-term outcomes and ignore the competing risk of death due to other causes. We aimed to predict the potential lifetime benefits with statin therapy, taking into account competing risks.Methods and findingsA microsimulation model based on 5-y follow-up data from the Rotterdam Study, a population-based cohort of individuals aged 55 y and older living in the Ommoord district of Rotterdam, the Netherlands, was used to estimate lifetime outcomes with and without statin therapy. The model was validated in-sample using 10-y follow-up data. We used baseline variables and model output to construct (1) a web-based calculator for gains in total and CVD-free life expectancy and (2) color charts for comparing these gains to the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) charts. In 2,428 participants (mean age 67.7 y, 35.5% men), statin therapy increased total life expectancy by 0.3 y (SD 0.2) and CVD-free life expectancy by 0.7 y (SD 0.4). Age, sex, smoking, blood pressure, hypertension, lipids, diabetes, glucose, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and creatinine were included in the calculator. Gains in total and CVD-free life expectancy increased with blood pressure, unfavorable lipid levels, and body mass index after multivariable adjustment. Gains decreased considerably with advancing age, while SCORE 10-y CVD mortality risk increased with age. Twenty-five percent of participants with a low SCORE risk achieved equal or larger gains in CVD-free life expectancy than the median gain in participants with a high SCORE risk.ConclusionsWe developed tools to predict personalized increases in total and CVD-free life expectancy with statin therapy. The predicted gains we found are small. If the underlying model is validated in an independent cohort, the tools may be useful in discussing with patients their individual outcomes with statin therapy.

Project description:Fluoride (F) in groundwater (GW) in excess of 1.5 mg/L is a globally distributed problem impacting the health of hundreds of millions of people, many of whom cannot access centralized treatment infrastructure. Animal (e.g., cow) bone char has received emerging interest as a low-cost F sorbent for use in decentralized household and community water treatment. Pilot column tests using full-sized granular bone char particles can be used to assess treatment performance of fixed-bed contactors, but are costly, time consuming, and require large amounts of test water. Rapid small-scale column tests (RSSCTs) can be used to simulate F uptake in bone char contactors if the relationship between F intraparticle diffusion kinetics and bone char particle size is known. Two common approaches to the RSSCT assume either constant (CD) or linear proportional (PD) sorbate diffusivity as a function of sorbent particle size. This study used experimentally determined pseudo-equilibrium and kinetic F sorption data in model groundwater as inputs to the homogeneous surface diffusion model (HSDM) to determine F intraparticle diffusion coefficients for different-sized bone char particles, and to fit RSSCT and pilot column breakthrough data to evaluate CD and PD approaches. Results of this study, corroborated by incorporation of additional literature data, indicate approximately linearly proportional diffusivity of F as a function of bone char particle size. Congruently, the PD-RSSCT approach provided a superior simulation of pilot column F breakthrough compared to the CD-RSSCT. PD-RSSCT breakthrough data closely matched pilot breakthrough on a scaled service time basis up to around 500 bed volumes, corresponding to a relative F breakthrough of about 40%, and provided a slightly conservative indicator of F removal thereafter. The PD-RSSCT was compared with a hybrid modeling and empirical workflow using the HSDM with experimentally determined pseudo-equilibrium and kinetic parameter inputs as time-and-cost-saving approaches to evaluating full-sized groundwater treatment system performance. This comparison and a sensitivity analysis of HSDM input parameters used in the hybrid workflow indicated that greater precision can be obtained using the PD-RSSCT.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Cancer survival studies are commonly analyzed using survival-time prediction models for cancer prognosis. A number of different performance metrics are used to ascertain the concordance between the predicted risk score of each patient and the actual survival time, but these metrics can sometimes conflict. Alternatively, patients are sometimes divided into two classes according to a survival-time threshold, and binary classifiers are applied to predict each patient's class. Although this approach has several drawbacks, it does provide natural performance metrics such as positive and negative predictive values to enable unambiguous assessments. METHODS: We compare the survival-time prediction and survival-time threshold approaches to analyzing cancer survival studies. We review and compare common performance metrics for the two approaches. We present new randomization tests and cross-validation methods to enable unambiguous statistical inferences for several performance metrics used with the survival-time prediction approach. We consider five survival prediction models consisting of one clinical model, two gene expression models, and two models from combinations of clinical and gene expression models. RESULTS: A public breast cancer dataset was used to compare several performance metrics using five prediction models. 1) For some prediction models, the hazard ratio from fitting a Cox proportional hazards model was significant, but the two-group comparison was insignificant, and vice versa. 2) The randomization test and cross-validation were generally consistent with the p-values obtained from the standard performance metrics. 3) Binary classifiers highly depended on how the risk groups were defined; a slight change of the survival threshold for assignment of classes led to very different prediction results. CONCLUSIONS: 1) Different performance metrics for evaluation of a survival prediction model may give different conclusions in its discriminatory ability. 2) Evaluation using a high-risk versus low-risk group comparison depends on the selected risk-score threshold; a plot of p-values from all possible thresholds can show the sensitivity of the threshold selection. 3) A randomization test of the significance of Somers' rank correlation can be used for further evaluation of performance of a prediction model. 4) The cross-validated power of survival prediction models decreases as the training and test sets become less balanced.

Dataset Information

Battery lifetime prediction and performance assessment of different modeling approaches.

Publications

Battery lifetime prediction and performance assessment of different modeling approaches.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets