Dataset Information

Outcomes Following Post-Hemorrhagic Ventricular Dilatation among Infants of Extremely Low Gestational Age.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To assess outcomes following post-hemorrhagic ventricular dilatation (PHVD) among infants born at ≤26 weeks of gestation.

Study design

Observational study of infants born April 1, 2011, to December 31, 2015, in the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network and categorized into 3 groups: PHVD, intracranial hemorrhage without ventricular dilatation, or normal head ultrasound. PHVD was treated per center practice. Neurodevelopmental impairment at 18-26 months was defined by cerebral palsy, Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition, cognitive or motor score <70, blindness, or deafness. Multivariable logistic regression examined the association of death or impairment, adjusting for neonatal course, center, maternal education, and parenchymal hemorrhage.

Results

Of 4216 infants, 815 had PHVD, 769 had hemorrhage without ventricular dilatation, and 2632 had normal head ultrasounds. Progressive dilatation occurred among 119 of 815 infants; the initial intervention in 66 infants was reservoir placement and 53 had ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Death or impairment occurred among 68%, 39%, and 28% of infants with PHVD, hemorrhage without dilatation, and normal head ultrasound, respectively; aOR (95% CI) were 4.6 (3.8-5.7) PHVD vs normal head ultrasound scan and 2.98 (2.3-3.8) for PHVD vs hemorrhage without dilatation. Death or impairment was more frequent with intervention for progressive dilatation vs no intervention (80% vs 65%; aOR 2.2 [1.38-3.8]). Death or impairment increased with parenchymal hemorrhage, intervention for PHVD, male sex, and surgery for retinopathy; odds decreased with each additional gestational week.

Conclusions

PHVD was associated with high rates of death or impairment among infants with gestational ages ≤26 weeks; risk was further increased among those with progressive ventricular dilation requiring intervention.

SUBMITTER: Shankaran S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7855243 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesThe objectives of this study are to determine whether abnormalities on neonatal cranial ultrasound (CUS) are associated with minor motor abnormalities at 2 years' corrected age (CA) and to assess functional outcomes and resource utilization among children with minor motor abnormalities.MethodsInfants born at <27 weeks in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014, who underwent neuroimaging with CUS at both <28 days and ≥28 days and were evaluated at 18 to 26 months' CA, were included. Follow-up included Bayley-3, neuromotor examination, Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level, and parent questionnaires about special services and resource needs. Children were classified by the most severe motor abnormality at 18 to 26 months' CA as follows: none, minor, or major motor function abnormality. Minor motor abnormalities were defined as any of the following: (1) Bayley-3 motor composite, fine motor score, or gross motor score 1 to 2 SDs below the test normative means; (2) mild abnormalities of axial or extremity motor skills on standardized neuromotor examination; or (3) GMFCS level 1.ResultsA total of 809 (35%) of 2306 children had minor motor function abnormalities alone. This did not increase substantially with CUS findings (no intraventricular hemorrhage [IVH]: 37%, grade I IVH: 32%, grade II IVH: 38%, grade III/IV IVH: 30%, isolated ventriculomegaly: 33%, and cystic periventricular leukomalacia: 24%). The adjusted odds of minor axial and upper extremity function abnormalities and GMFCS level 1 were significantly higher in children with more severe CUS findings. Children with minor motor abnormalities had increased resource utilization and evidence of functional impairment compared with those without motor function abnormalities.ConclusionMinor motor abnormalities at 2 years' CA are common and cannot be predicted by neonatal CUS abnormalities alone. Minor motor abnormalities are associated with higher resource utilization and evidence of functional impairment. These findings have important implications for early counseling and follow-up planning for extremely preterm infants.