Dataset Information

A contrast-adaptive method for simultaneous whole-brain and lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis.

ABSTRACT: Here we present a method for the simultaneous segmentation of white matter lesions and normal-appearing neuroanatomical structures from multi-contrast brain MRI scans of multiple sclerosis patients. The method integrates a novel model for white matter lesions into a previously validated generative model for whole-brain segmentation. By using separate models for the shape of anatomical structures and their appearance in MRI, the algorithm can adapt to data acquired with different scanners and imaging protocols without retraining. We validate the method using four disparate datasets, showing robust performance in white matter lesion segmentation while simultaneously segmenting dozens of other brain structures. We further demonstrate that the contrast-adaptive method can also be safely applied to MRI scans of healthy controls, and replicate previously documented atrophy patterns in deep gray matter structures in MS. The algorithm is publicly available as part of the open-source neuroimaging package FreeSurfer.

SUBMITTER: Cerri S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7856304 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A contrast-adaptive method for simultaneous whole-brain and lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis.

Cerri Stefano S Puonti Oula O Meier Dominik S DS Wuerfel Jens J Mühlau Mark M Siebner Hartwig R HR Van Leemput Koen K

NeuroImage 20201022

Here we present a method for the simultaneous segmentation of white matter lesions and normal-appearing neuroanatomical structures from multi-contrast brain MRI scans of multiple sclerosis patients. The method integrates a novel model for white matter lesions into a previously validated generative model for whole-brain segmentation. By using separate models for the shape of anatomical structures and their appearance in MRI, the algorithm can adapt to data acquired with different scanners and ima ...[more]

PMID: 33099007

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeAccurate lesion segmentation is important for measurements of lesion load and atrophy in subjects with multiple sclerosis (MS). International MS lesion challenges show a preference of convolutional neural networks (CNN) strategies, such as nicMSlesions. However, since the software is trained on fairly homogenous training data, we aimed to test the performance of nicMSlesions in an independent dataset with manual and other automatic lesion segmentations to determine whether this method is suitable for larger, multi-center studies.MethodsManual lesion segmentation was performed in fourteen subjects with MS on sagittal 3D FLAIR images from a 3T GE whole-body scanner with 8-channel head coil. We compared five different categories of automated lesion segmentation methods for their volumetric and spatial agreement with manual segmentation: (i) unsupervised, untrained (LesionTOADS); (ii) supervised, untrained (LST-LPA and nicMSlesions with default settings); (iii) supervised, untrained with threshold adjustment (LST-LPA optimized for current data); (iv) supervised, trained with leave-one-out cross-validation on fourteen subjects with MS (nicMSlesions and BIANCA); and (v) supervised, trained on a single subject with MS (nicMSlesions). Volumetric accuracy was determined by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and spatial accuracy by Dice's similarity index (SI). Volumes and SI were compared between methods using repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman tests with post-hoc pairwise comparison.ResultsThe best volumetric and spatial agreement with manual was obtained with the supervised and trained methods nicMSlesions and BIANCA (ICC absolute agreement > 0.968 and median SI > 0.643) and the worst with the unsupervised, untrained method LesionTOADS (ICC absolute agreement = 0.140 and median SI = 0.444). Agreement with manual in the single-subject network training of nicMSlesions was poor for input with low lesion volumes (i.e. two subjects with lesion volumes ≤ 3.0 ml). For the other twelve subjects, ICC varied from 0.593 to 0.973 and median SI varied from 0.535 to 0.606. In all cases, the single-subject trained nicMSlesions segmentations outperformed LesionTOADS, and in almost all cases it also outperformed LST-LPA.ConclusionInput from only one subject to re-train the deep learning CNN nicMSlesions is sufficient for adequate lesion segmentation, with on average higher volumetric and spatial agreement with manual than obtained with the untrained methods LesionTOADS and LST-LPA.

Project description:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to detect lesions in the brains of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and is essential for diagnosing the disease and monitoring its progression. In practice, lesion load is often quantified by either manual or semi-automated segmentation of MRI, which is time-consuming, costly, and associated with large inter- and intra-observer variability. We propose OASIS is Automated Statistical Inference for Segmentation (OASIS), an automated statistical method for segmenting MS lesions in MRI studies. We use logistic regression models incorporating multiple MRI modalities to estimate voxel-level probabilities of lesion presence. Intensity-normalized T1-weighted, T2-weighted, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and proton density volumes from 131 MRI studies (98 MS subjects, 33 healthy subjects) with manual lesion segmentations were used to train and validate our model. Within this set, OASIS detected lesions with a partial area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for clinically relevant false positive rates of 1% and below of 0.59% (95% CI; [0.50%, 0.67%]) at the voxel level. An experienced MS neuroradiologist compared these segmentations to those produced by LesionTOADS, an image segmentation software that provides segmentation of both lesions and normal brain structures. For lesions, OASIS out-performed LesionTOADS in 74% (95% CI: [65%, 82%]) of cases for the 98 MS subjects. To further validate the method, we applied OASIS to 169 MRI studies acquired at a separate center. The neuroradiologist again compared the OASIS segmentations to those from LesionTOADS. For lesions, OASIS ranked higher than LesionTOADS in 77% (95% CI: [71%, 83%]) of cases. For a randomly selected subset of 50 of these studies, one additional radiologist and one neurologist also scored the images. Within this set, the neuroradiologist ranked OASIS higher than LesionTOADS in 76% (95% CI: [64%, 88%]) of cases, the neurologist 66% (95% CI: [52%, 78%]) and the radiologist 52% (95% CI: [38%, 66%]). OASIS obtains the estimated probability for each voxel to be part of a lesion by weighting each imaging modality with coefficient weights. These coefficients are explicit, obtained using standard model fitting techniques, and can be reused in other imaging studies. This fully automated method allows sensitive and specific detection of lesion presence and may be rapidly applied to large collections of images.

Project description:Accurate volume measurements of the brain structures are important for treatment evaluation and disease follow-up in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. With the aim of obtaining reproducible measurements and avoiding the intra-/inter-rater variability that manual delineations introduce, several automated brain structure segmentation strategies have been proposed in recent years. However, most of these strategies tend to be affected by the abnormal MS lesion intensities, which corrupt the structure segmentation result. To address this problem, we recently reformulated two label fusion strategies of the state of the art, improving their segmentation performance on the lesion areas. Here, we integrate these reformulated strategies in a completely automated pipeline that includes pre-processing (inhomogeneity correction and intensity normalization), atlas selection, masked registration and label fusion, and combine them with an automated lesion segmentation method of the state of the art. We study the effect of automating the lesion mask acquisition on the structure segmentation result, analyzing the output of the proposed pipeline when used in combination with manually and automatically segmented lesion masks. We further analyze the effect of those masks on the segmentation result of the original label fusion strategies when combined with the well-established pre-processing step of lesion filling. The experiments performed show that, when the original methods are used to segment the lesion-filled images, significant structure volume differences are observed in a comparison between manually and automatically segmented lesion masks. The results indicate a mean volume decrease of 1.13%±1.93 in the cerebrospinal fluid, and a mean volume increase of 0.13%±0.14 and 0.05%±0.08 in the cerebral white matter and cerebellar gray matter, respectively. On the other hand, no significant volume differences were found when the proposed automated pipeline was used for segmentation, which demonstrates its robustness against variations in the lesion mask used.

Dataset Information

A contrast-adaptive method for simultaneous whole-brain and lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis.

Publications

A contrast-adaptive method for simultaneous whole-brain and lesion segmentation in multiple sclerosis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets