Dataset Information

A nomogram to predict unfavourable outcome in patients receiving oral anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation after stroke.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

It is unknown whether the type of treatment (direct oral anticoagulant versus vitamin K antagonist) and the time of treatment introduction (early versus late) may affect the functional outcome in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation. We aimed to develop and validate a nomogram model including direct oral anticoagulant/vitamin K antagonist and early/late oral anticoagulant introduction for predicting the probability of unfavourable outcome after stroke in atrial fibrillation-patients.

Patients and methods

We conducted an individual patient data analysis of four prospective studies. Unfavourable functional outcome was defined as three-month modified Rankin Scale score 3 -6. To generate the nomogram, five independent predictors including age (<65 years, reference; 65--79; or 80), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (0--5 points, reference; 6--15; 16--25; or >25), acute revascularisation treatments (yes, reference, or no), direct oral anticoagulant (reference) or vitamin K antagonist, and early (7 days, reference) or late (8--30) anticoagulant introduction entered into a final logistic regression model. The discriminative performance of the model was assessed by using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

Results

A total of 2102 patients with complete data for generating the nomogram was randomly dichotomised into training (n = 1553) and test (n = 549) sets. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.822 (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.800--0.844) in the training set and 0.803 (95% CI: 0.764--0.842) in the test set. The model was adequately calibrated (9.852; p = 0.276 for the Hosmer--Lemeshow test).

Discussion and conclusion

Our nomogram is the first model including type of oral anticoagulant and time of treatment introduction to predict the probability of three-month unfavourable outcome in a large multicentre cohort of stroke patients with atrial fibrillation.

SUBMITTER: Cappellari M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7856583 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe CHA2DS2-VASc score (calculated as congestive heart failure, hypertension, age 75 years and older, diabetes, stroke or TIA, vascular disease, age 65 to 74 years, and sex category) is the standard for assessing risk of stroke and systemic embolism and includes age and thromboembolic history. To our knowledge, no studies have comprehensively evaluated safety and effectiveness outcomes among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants according to independent, categorical risk strata.ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence of key adverse outcomes among patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants by CHA2DS2-VASc risk score range, thromboembolic event history, and age group.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study was a retrospective claims data analysis using combined data sets from 5 large health claims databases. Eligible participants were adult patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated oral anticoagulants. Data were analyzed between January 2012 and June 2019.ExposureInitiation of oral anticoagulants.Main outcomes and measuresWe observed clinical outcomes (including stroke or systemic embolism, major bleeding, and a composite outcome) on treatment through study end, censoring for discontinuation of oral anticoagulants, death, and insurance disenrollment. The population was stratified by CHA2DS2-VASc risk score; history of stroke, systemic embolism, or transient ischemic attack; and age groups. We calculated time to event, incidence rates, and cumulative incidence for outcomes.ResultsWe identified 1 141 097 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation; the mean (SD) age was 75.0 (10.5) years, 608 127 patients (53.3%) were men, and over 1 million were placed in the 2 highest risk categories (high risk 1, 327 766 participants; high risk 2, 688 449 participants). Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index scores ranged progressively alongside CHA2DS2-VASc risk score strata (mean [SD] scores: low risk, 0.4 [1.0]; high risk 2, 4.1 [2.9]). The crude incidence of stroke and systemic embolism generally progressed alongside risk score strata (low risk, 0.25 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 0.18-0.34 events]; high risk 2, 3.43 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 3.06-4.20 events]); patients at the second-highest risk strata with thromboembolic event history had higher stroke incidence vs patients at the highest risk score strata without event history (2.06 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 2.00-3.12 events] vs 1.18 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 1.14-1.30 events]). Major bleeding and composite incidence also increased progressively alongside risk score strata (major bleeding: low risk, 0.68 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 0.56-0.82 events]; high risk 2, 6.29 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 6.21-6.62 events]; composite incidence: 1.22 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 1.06-1.41 events]; high risk 2, 10.67 events per 100 person-years [95% CI, 10.26-11.48 events]). The 12-month cumulative incidence proportions for stroke and systemic embolism, major bleeding, and composite outcomes progressed alongside risk score strata (stroke or systemic embolism, 0.30%-1.85%; major bleeding, 0.55%-5.55%; composite, 1.05%-8.23%). Age subgroup analysis followed similar trends.Conclusions and relevanceThe observed incidence of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding events generally conformed to an expected increasing incidence by risk score, adding insight into the importance of specific risk score range, thromboembolic event history, and age group strata. These results can help inform clinical decision-making, research, and policy.

Project description:BackgroundWe evaluated adherence to dosing criteria for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) taking dabigatran or rivaroxaban and the impact of off-label dosing on thromboembolic and bleeding risk.MethodsWe used data for a retrospective cohort from a large U.S. health plan for Medicare beneficiaries age > =65 years with AF who initiated dabigatran or rivaroxaban during 2010-2016. Stroke and major bleeding were quantified in patients who were eligible for low dose but received standard dose, and in patients who were eligible for standard dose but received low dose.ResultsWe identified 8035 and 19,712 patients who initiated dabigatran or rivaroxaban, respectively. Overall, 1401 (17.4%) and 7820 (39.7%) patients who received dabigatran and rivaroxaban met criteria for low dose, respectively. Of those, 959 (68.5%) and 3904 (49.9%) received standard dose. In contrast, 1013 (15.3%) and 2551 (21.5%) of patients eligible for standard dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban received low dose. Mean follow-up for patients eligible for low and standard dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban were 13.9, 15.1, 10.1, and 12.3 months, respectively. In unadjusted analyses, patients eligible for low or standard dose dabigatran and rivaroxaban but receiving off-label dose, had no differences in the rates of ischemic stroke. Among patients who met criteria for standard dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), use of low dose was associated with significantly higher risk of any major bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 1.44; 95% CI 1.14-1.8, P = 0.002, Rivaroxaban HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.11-1.6, P = 0.002) and gastrointestinal bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 1.48; 95% CI 1.08-2, P = 0.016). In patients who met criteria for low dose DOACs, there was lower risk of major bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.43-0.8, P < 0.001), gastrointestinal (Rivaroxaban: HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.64-0.98, P = 0.03) and intracranial bleeding (Dabigatran: HR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.12-0.9, P = 0.001) with standard dosing. After propensity matching, use of off-label doses was not associated with stroke, major, gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding for either dabigatran or rivaroxaban.ConclusionsWhile a significant number of patients receive higher or lower dose of dabigatran and rivaroxaban than recommended, we found no evidence of significant impact on thromboembolic or hemorrhagic outcomes.