Dataset Information

Neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 in EGFR-Mutant/ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

ABSTRACT: Defining the optimal neoadjuvant strategy in early-stage and locoregional (N2) oncogenic-driven lung cancer remains a major challenge for the scientific community. Whereas significant advances have been achieved with the use of personalized medicine and targeted therapies in advanced stages, we are still far from translating the same magnitude of benefits into an earlier-stage disease. Perioperative strategies with neoadjuvant and adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR and ALK gene alterations have yielded mixed results and further biomarker-driven trials are needed to shed more light on the significance of inhibiting the oncogenic signaling addiction at earlier stages of the disease and the conceivable value of incorporating more potent targeted inhibitors in this setting. Meanwhile, the landscape of early-stage lung cancer management is progressing rapidly, and we anticipate the incorporation of novel immunotherapeutic agents on the basis of this promising preliminary activity as induction strategies. Whether the benefits observed in the overall population can be translated into specific subsets of oncogenic-driven tumors is still unknown, but it clearly reinforces the importance of incorporating-sooner rather than later-a biomarker-testing strategy into the routine work-up of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There are still many challenges to overcome such as the need to stablish standardized surrogate endpoints and to define the optimal duration of perioperative treatment, as well as how to expedite patient recruitment using enrichment strategies for biomarker stratified trials. Despite the difficulties, we are living in exciting times and coming up on a new window of opportunities for achieving the ultimate goal of curing early-stage lung cancer and improving long-term outcomes by eliminating the minimal residual disease and reducing the risk for metastatic recurrence.

SUBMITTER: Reyes R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7867758 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 in EGFR-Mutant/ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

Reyes Roxana R Reguart Noemi N

Translational lung cancer research 20210101 1

Defining the optimal neoadjuvant strategy in early-stage and locoregional (N2) oncogenic-driven lung cancer remains a major challenge for the scientific community. Whereas significant advances have been achieved with the use of personalized medicine and targeted therapies in advanced stages, we are still far from translating the same magnitude of benefits into an earlier-stage disease. Perioperative strategies with neoadjuvant and adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR ...[more]

PMID: 33569340

Similar Datasets

Project description:Lessons learnedThe findings of this prospective, single-arm, phase II study showed that neoadjuvant erlotinib was well tolerated and might improve the radical resection rate in patients with stage IIIA-N2 epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Erlotinib shows promise as a neoadjuvant therapy option in this patient population.Next-generation sequencing may be useful for predicting outcomes with preoperative tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with NSCLC.Large-scale randomized controlled trials investigating the role of TKIs in perioperative therapy, combining neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments to enhance personalized therapy for patients in this precision medicine era, are warranted.BackgroundInformation on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is scarce. We evaluated whether neoadjuvant erlotinib improves operability and survival in patients with stage IIIA-N2 EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.MethodsWe conducted a prospective, single-arm, phase II study. Patients received erlotinib 150 mg per day for 56 days in the neoadjuvant period. The primary endpoint was the radical resection rate.ResultsNineteen patients were included in the final analysis. After erlotinib treatment, 14 patients underwent surgery. The radical resection rate was 68.4% (13/19) with a 21.1% (4/19) rate of pathological downstaging. The objective response rate was 42.1%; 89.5% (17/19) of patients achieved disease control, with a 10.3-month median disease-free survival among patients who underwent surgery. Among all 19 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy, median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 11.2 and 51.6 months, respectively. Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 36.8% (7/19) of patients, with the most common AE being rash (26.3%); 15.8% experienced grade 3/4 AEs. Quality of life (QoL) improvements were observed after treatment with erlotinib for almost all QoL assessments. Effects of TP53 mutation on prognosis were evaluated in eight patients with adequate tissue samples. Next-generation sequencing revealed that most patients had a TP53 gene mutation (7/8) in addition to an EGFR mutation. No TP53 mutation, or very low abundance, was associated with longer PFS (36 and 38 months, respectively), whereas high abundance was associated with short PFS (8 months).ConclusionNeoadjuvant erlotinib was well tolerated and may improve the radical resection rate in this patient population. Next-generation sequencing may predict outcomes with preoperative TKIs.

Project description:BackgroundWe sought to determine the perioperative safety and feasibility outcomes of stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsThe clinical details of patients who attended the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Eligible patients had pathologically proven stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC and were randomly prescribed neoadjuvant therapy. Those in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group received two cycles of nivolumab (3 mg/kg) and those in the control group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 80 mg/m2 cisplatin). All patients were scheduled to undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was the risk of major complications within 30 days of surgery and the secondary endpoints were interval to surgery and 30-day mortality.ResultsA total of 107 eligible patients were evaluated of whom 25 were allocated to the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group and 82 to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. The median interval to surgery was similar in the two groups at 29.2 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 27.1 to 31.4 days] in the immunotherapy group and 28.7 days (95% CI, 27.6 to 29.8 days) in the chemotherapy group (P=0.656). While treatment-related adverse events were reported in most patients, all 25 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 80 of 82 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, although one patient in the latter group died within 30 days of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the probability of grade 3 or higher postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery (P=0.757).ConclusionsMost patients achieved the primary and secondary endpoints of the study. However, the major pathological response (MPR) showed statistically significant differences between the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups.

Dataset Information

Neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 in EGFR-Mutant/ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

Publications

Neoadjuvant treatment of stage IIIA-N2 in <i>EGFR</i>-Mutant/<i>ALK</i>-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets