Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy vs. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIIA EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

ABSTRACT: Purpose: The role of targeted therapy in the neoadjuvant field of stage IIIA epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant targeted therapy (NTT) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) used as a benchmark comparator. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in four databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI) for eligible studies on NTT published before October 2020. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs). Statistical analysis and bias assessment were performed by RevMan 5.3. Results: A total of 319 patients, including 3 randomized controlled trials and 2 non-randomized controlled trials, were included in the meta-analysis. Perform the second subgroup analysis after excluding 2 non-randomized controlled trials. The meta-analysis reveals that, for EGFR mutation-positive stage IIIA NSCLC patients, compared with NCT, NTT can significantly increase ORR (relative risk [RR]:1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.35-2.15; subgroup-RR:1.56, 95% CI 1.23-2.0) and significantly reduce grade 3/4 AEs (RR:0.5, 95% CI 0.34-0.75; subgroup-RR: 0.53, 95% CI 0.26-1.08). The OS of the NTT arm is slightly higher, but the difference is not significant (hazards ratio [HR]: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.43-1.27; subgroup-HR: 0.64 95% CI 0.40-1.03). No difference in PFS was found (HR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.27-2.44). Conclusion: In neoadjuvant setting, targeted therapy has a definitive effect on patients with EGFR mutation-positive stage IIIA NSCLC and is even better than chemotherapy in terms of toxicity and tumor response rate. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42021221136.

SUBMITTER: Chen D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8417411 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundWe sought to determine the perioperative safety and feasibility outcomes of stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following neoadjuvant immunotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.MethodsThe clinical details of patients who attended the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University between January 2019 and December 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Eligible patients had pathologically proven stage IIIA (N2) NSCLC and were randomly prescribed neoadjuvant therapy. Those in the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group received two cycles of nivolumab (3 mg/kg) and those in the control group received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine and 80 mg/m2 cisplatin). All patients were scheduled to undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was the risk of major complications within 30 days of surgery and the secondary endpoints were interval to surgery and 30-day mortality.ResultsA total of 107 eligible patients were evaluated of whom 25 were allocated to the neoadjuvant immunotherapy group and 82 to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group. The median interval to surgery was similar in the two groups at 29.2 days [95% confidence interval (CI), 27.1 to 31.4 days] in the immunotherapy group and 28.7 days (95% CI, 27.6 to 29.8 days) in the chemotherapy group (P=0.656). While treatment-related adverse events were reported in most patients, all 25 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and 80 of 82 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, although one patient in the latter group died within 30 days of surgery. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in the probability of grade 3 or higher postoperative complications within 30 days after surgery (P=0.757).ConclusionsMost patients achieved the primary and secondary endpoints of the study. However, the major pathological response (MPR) showed statistically significant differences between the neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy groups.

Project description:ImportanceThe benefit of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy for resectable stage IIIA or IIIB non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unknown.ObjectiveTo assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC.Design, setting, and participantsIn this randomized phase 2 clinical trial conducted at 2 hospitals in China, patients aged 18 to 70 years with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) NSCLC were enrolled between April 7, 2020, and January 12, 2022.InterventionsPatients were randomly assigned to receive 3 cycles of camrelizumab (200 mg) plus chemotherapy (nab-paclitaxel, 130 mg/m2, and platinum [cisplatin, 75 mg/m2; carboplatin, area under the curve, 5; or nedaplatin, 100 mg/m2]) or chemotherapy alone, followed by surgery after 4 to 6 weeks.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary end point was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. Secondary end points included the major pathologic response (MPR) rate, objective response rate (ORR), event-free survival (EFS), and safety. Disease-free survival (DFS, defined as the time from surgery to disease recurrence or death from any cause) was analyzed post hoc. Efficacy was assessed on a modified intention-to-treat basis.ResultsNinety-four Chinese patients were randomized, and 88 (93.6%; median age, 61 years [IQR, 54-65 years]; 74 men [84.1%]) received allocated neoadjuvant treatment (43 received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, and 45 received chemotherapy alone). Among these 88 patients, the pCR rate was 32.6% (14 of 43; 95% CI, 19.1%-48.5%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy vs 8.9% (4 of 45; 95% CI, 2.5%-21.2%) with chemotherapy alone (odds ratio, 4.95; 95% CI, 1.35-22.37; P = .008). The MPR rates were 65.1% (95% CI, 49.1%-79.0%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and 15.6% (95% CI, 6.5%-29.5%) with chemotherapy alone. The radiographic ORRs were 72.1% (95% CI, 56.3%-84.7%) with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and 53.3% (95% CI, 37.9%-68.3%) with chemotherapy alone. With a median follow-up of 14.1 months (IQR, 9.2-20.9 months), the median EFS and DFS were not reached in either group. The most common neoadjuvant treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were decreased white blood cell count (6 of 43 [14.0%] in the camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group vs 2 of 45 [4.4%] in the chemotherapy group) and decreased neutrophil count (3 of 43 [7.0%] in the camrelizumab plus chemotherapy group vs 5 of 45 [11.1%] in the chemotherapy group). No treatment-related deaths were reported.Conclusions and relevanceThis randomized clinical trial found that among patients with resectable stage IIIA or IIIB (T3N2) NSCLC, camrelizumab plus chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, significantly improved the pCR rate with manageable toxic effects.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04338620.

Project description:BackgroundImmunotherapy, chemotherapy and surgery all have significant roles in the management of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery has shown encouraging efficacy for resectable SCLC with a good tolerability and considerable survival benefit. However, there are still few data on whether surgery for stage I-IIIA SCLC can be performed after immunotherapy with chemotherapy. Therefore, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery in patients with stage I-IIIA SCLC in the hope of adding new ideas to the treatment of SCLC.MethodsThe study group comprised 19 patients with stage I-IIIA SCLC who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy between 2019 and 2021. Patients received 2-4 cycles of immunotherapy combined with platinum-containing dual-drug chemotherapy (platinum + paclitaxel) before surgery. Imaging evaluation was performed every two cycles until surgery. Tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy, neoadjuvant treatment related adverse events, perioperative and postoperative complications, surgical resection rate, and degree of tumor regression were evaluated. We obtained follow-up data from the patients' regular examination or treatment in hospital. If we can't complete it, contacting patients by telephone or WeChat would be adopted by us. The follow-up was not terminated until 3 months after surgery.ResultsThe objective response rate (ORR) was 84.2% (16/19), and no patients had progressive disease (PD). Of the 10 patients who underwent surgery, and approximately 9 (90.0%) had R0 resection. There were no perioperative deaths, and 1 case of pyothorax. The rate of pathological complete remission (pCR) and major pathological response (MPR) was 30.0% (3/10), and 40.0% (4/10) respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse reactions comprised 1 case of anemia and 1 case of constipation.ConclusionsNeoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy followed by surgical resection for patients with stage I-IIIA SCLC is effective and safe with a high ORR and MPR rate, as well as a high R0 resection rate and a tolerable toxicity profile. Whether this regimen gives a survival benefit should be confirmed by further follow-up and larger, randomized controlled trials are required to confirm our findings.

Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy vs. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Stage IIIA EGFR-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets