Dataset Information

Financial implications of New York City's weight management initiative.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To estimate potential annual savings in medical expenditures from a subsidized weight management program from the NYC Government perspective.

Design

Longitudinal observational study.

Setting

Employees of New York City (NYC) government and enrolled dependents.

Sample

14,946 participants with overweight and obesity.

Intervention

WW (formerly Weight Watchers®) 'Workshop' and 'Digital' programs.

Measures

Participation rate, enrollment duration, weight change, and predicted gross and net total and per capita medical expenditure savings and return on investment (ROI).

Analysis

Participation rate, enrollment duration, weight change, and program costs are based on direct observation. Predicted savings are simulated based on published data relating weight loss to medical expenditure reductions.

Results

In total, 47% of participating employees and 50% of participating dependents lost weight during the enrollment period. Mean (median) enrollment duration for employees was 7.1 months (7.0) and for dependents was 6.9 months (6.0). Mean (median) weight losses for the employees in 'Workshops' and 'Digital' was 6.6 lbs (2.80) and 6.3 lbs (0.0). For dependents, weight losses were 7.4 lbs (3.59) and 11.6 lbs (2.0). Per capita and total predicted net savings to NYC Government from employees was estimated to be $120 and $1,486,102 for an ROI of 143%. Including dependents, predicted net savings increases to $1,963,431 for an ROI of 189%. Over 80% of savings came from participants in the Obese III category.

Conclusion

An evidence-based weight management program has the potential to generate a positive ROI for employers. Future studies should validate these estimates using actual data and more rigorous designs.

SUBMITTER: Agrawal S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7877753 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Financial implications of New York City's weight management initiative.

Agrawal Sagun S Wojtanowski Alexis C AC Tringali Laura L Foster Gary D GD Finkelstein Eric A EA

PloS one 20210211 2

<h4>Purpose</h4>To estimate potential annual savings in medical expenditures from a subsidized weight management program from the NYC Government perspective.<h4>Design</h4>Longitudinal observational study.<h4>Setting</h4>Employees of New York City (NYC) government and enrolled dependents.<h4>Sample</h4>14,946 participants with overweight and obesity.<h4>Intervention</h4>WW (formerly Weight Watchers®) 'Workshop' and 'Digital' programs.<h4>Measures</h4>Participation rate, enrollment duration, weig ...[more]

PMID: 33571249

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe spring 2020 surge of COVID-19 unprecedentedly strained ventilator supply in New York City, with many hospitals nearly exhausting available ventilators and subsequently seriously considering enacting crisis standards of care and implementing New York State Ventilator Allocation Guidelines (NYVAG). However, there is little evidence as to how NYVAG would perform if implemented.ObjectivesTo evaluate the performance and potential improvement of NYVAG during a surge of patients with respect to the length of rationing, overall mortality, and worsening health disparities.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study included intubated patients in a single health system in New York City from March through July 2020. A total of 20 000 simulations were conducted of ventilator triage (10 000 following NYVAG and 10 000 following a proposed improved NYVAG) during a crisis period, defined as the point at which the prepandemic ventilator supply was 95% utilized.ExposuresThe NYVAG protocol for triage ventilators.Main outcomes and measuresComparison of observed survival rates with simulations of scenarios requiring NYVAG ventilator rationing.ResultsThe total cohort included 1671 patients; of these, 674 intubated patients (mean [SD] age, 63.7 [13.8] years; 465 male [69.9%]) were included in the crisis period, with 571 (84.7%) testing positive for COVID-19. Simulated ventilator rationing occurred for 163.9 patients over 15.0 days, 44.4% (95% CI, 38.3%-50.0%) of whom would have survived if provided a ventilator while only 34.8% (95% CI, 28.5%-40.0%) of those newly intubated patients receiving a reallocated ventilator survived. While triage categorization at the time of intubation exhibited partial prognostic differentiation, 94.8% of all ventilator rationing occurred after a time trial. Within this subset, 43.1% were intubated for 7 or more days with a favorable SOFA score that had not improved. An estimated 60.6% of these patients would have survived if sustained on a ventilator. Revising triage subcategorization, proposed improved NYVAG, would have improved this alarming ventilator allocation inefficiency (25.3% [95% CI, 22.1%-28.4%] of those selected for ventilator rationing would have survived if provided a ventilator). NYVAG ventilator rationing did not exacerbate existing health disparities.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study of intubated patients experiencing simulated ventilator rationing during the apex of the New York City COVID-19 2020 surge, NYVAG diverted ventilators from patients with a higher chance of survival to those with a lower chance of survival. Future efforts should be focused on triage subcategorization, which improved this triage inefficiency, and ventilator rationing after a time trial, when most ventilator rationing occurred.

Dataset Information

Financial implications of New York City's weight management initiative.

Purpose

Design

Setting

Sample

Intervention

Measures

Analysis

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Financial implications of New York City's weight management initiative.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets