Dataset Information

Randomized Phase II Trial of Anthracycline-free and Anthracycline-containing Neoadjuvant Carboplatin Chemotherapy Regimens in Stage I-III Triple-negative Breast Cancer (NeoSTOP).

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Addition of carboplatin (Cb) to anthracycline chemotherapy improves pathologic complete response (pCR), and carboplatin plus taxane regimens also yield encouraging pCR rates in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Aim of the NeoSTOP multisite randomized phase II trial was to assess efficacy of anthracycline-free and anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant carboplatin regimens.

Patients and methods

Patients aged ≥18 years with stage I-III TNBC were randomized (1:1) to receive either paclitaxel (P) weekly × 12 plus carboplatin AUC6 every 21 days × 4 followed by doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) every 14 days × 4 (CbP → AC, arm A), or carboplatin AUC6 + docetaxel (D) every 21 days × 6 (CbD, arm B). Stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL) were assessed. Primary endpoint was pCR in breast and axilla. Other endpoints included residual cancer burden (RCB), toxicity, cost, and event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

One hundred patients were randomized; arm A (n = 48) or arm B (n = 52). pCR was 54% [95% confidence interval (CI), 40%-69%] in arm A and 54% (95% CI, 40%-68%) in arm B. RCB 0+I rate was 67% in both arms. Median sTIL density was numerically higher in those with pCR compared with those with residual disease (20% vs. 5%; P = 0.25). At median follow-up of 38 months, EFS and OS were similar in the two arms. Grade 3/4 adverse events were more common in arm A compared with arm B, with the most notable differences in neutropenia (60% vs. 8%; P < 0.001) and febrile neutropenia (19% vs. 0%; P < 0.001). There was one treatment-related death (arm A) due to acute leukemia. Mean treatment cost was lower for arm B compared with arm A (P = 0.02).

Conclusions

The two-drug CbD regimen yielded pCR, RCB 0+I, and survival rates similar to the four-drug regimen of CbP → AC, but with a more favorable toxicity profile and lower treatment-associated cost.

SUBMITTER: Sharma P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7887017 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Owing to the complex processes required for anthracycline-induced cytotoxicity, a prospectively defined multifactorial Consensus Signature (ConSig) might improve prediction of anthracycline response in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, whose only standard systemic treatment option is chemotherapy. AIMS:We aimed to construct and evaluate a multifactorial signature, comprising measures of each function required for anthracycline sensitivity in TNBC. METHODS:ConSigs were constructed based on five steps required for anthracycline function: drug penetration, nuclear topoisomerase II? (topoII?) protein location, increased topoII? messenger RNA (mRNA) expression, apoptosis induction, and immune activation measured by, respectively, HIF1? or SHARP1 signature, LAPTM4B mRNA, topoII? mRNA, Minimal Gene signature or YWHAZ mRNA, and STAT1 signature. TNBC patients treated with neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy without taxane were identified from publicly available gene expression data derived with Affymetrix HG-U133 arrays (training set). In silico analyses of correlation between gene expression data and pathological complete response (pCR) were performed using receiver-operating characteristic curves. To determine anthracycline specificity, ConSigs were assessed in patients treated with anthracycline plus taxane. Specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive value, and odds ratio (OR) were calculated for ConSigs. Analyses were repeated in two validation gene expression data sets derived using different microarray platforms. RESULTS:In the training set, 29 of 147 patients had pCR after anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Various combinations of components were evaluated, with the most powerful anthracycline response predictors being ConSig1: (STAT1+topoII? mRNA+LAPTM4B) and ConSig2: (STAT1+topoII? mRNA+HIF1?). ConSig1 demonstrated high negative predictive value (85%) and high OR for no pCR (3.18) and outperformed ConSig2 in validation sets for anthracycline specificity. CONCLUSIONS:With further validation, ConSig1 may help refine selection of TNBC patients for anthracycline chemotherapy.