Dataset Information

Data on distant metastasis and survival after locoregional recurrence following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

ABSTRACT: Nipple-spring mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction is being increasingly used in the treatment of breast cancer [1]. However, there are limited available data on the prognostic implications of locoregional recurrence (LRR) following this surgical procedure. This article is a supplementary resource of the original research article by Wu ZY et al. entitled "Locoregional Recurrence Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Patterns and Prognostic Significance" [2] and presents data regarding the subsequent distant metastasis following the first LRR, as well as the prognoses for isolated local recurrences according to the site of recurrence after NSM and immediate breast reconstruction for primary breast cancer. Data from a total of 1,696 patients with primary breast cancer who underwent NSM with immediate reconstruction from March 2003 to December 2016 at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, were retrospectively reviewed. An LRR as the first event was found to have developed in 172 patients. Among these, 117 cases (6.9%) involved isolated local recurrence, including 52 cases (3.1%) of nipple-areola complex recurrence, 41 cases (2.4%) of skin/subcutaneous recurrence, and 24 cases (1.4%) of chest wall recurrence. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank test were performed to compare the subgroups of local recurrence. In 172 patients with LRR, subsequent distant metastases were observed in 30 cases (17.4%). Our data may be helpful for conducting further in-depth investigations on salvage treatment options in patients with LRR following NSM and immediate breast reconstruction.

SUBMITTER: Wu ZY

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7900209 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Data on distant metastasis and survival after locoregional recurrence following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Wu Zhen-Yu ZY Han Hyun Ho HH Kim Hee Jeong HJ Lee Jongwon J Chung Il Yong IY Kim Jisun J Lee Saebyeol S Eom Jin Sup JS Kim Sung-Bae SB Gong Gyungyub G Kim Hak Hee HH Son Byung-Ho BH Ahn Sei-Hyun SH Ko BeomSeok B

Data in brief 20210205

Nipple-spring mastectomy (NSM) with immediate breast reconstruction is being increasingly used in the treatment of breast cancer [1]. However, there are limited available data on the prognostic implications of locoregional recurrence (LRR) following this surgical procedure. This article is a supplementary resource of the original research article by Wu ZY et al. entitled "Locoregional Recurrence Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction: Patterns and Prognostic Sig ...[more]

PMID: 33665246

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough video-assisted breast surgery is gaining popularity, endoscopic reconstruction after mastectomy is still facing lots of problems, bring about that endoscopic method has not yet become a standard procedure for breast cancer reconstruction. Here, we introduce a novel surgical technique of video-assisted transaxillary nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate implant-based breast reconstruction and describe the detailed surgical procedure using this technique.MethodsDetailed steps of surgical procedure, the patient characteristics and the mean operative time of this new technique were described in this article. All patients were asked to score their satisfaction with their reconstructed breasts preoperatively, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperatively using the BREAST-Q.ResultsAt first, we used our "conventional method" and performed on 10 patients from April 2017 to June 2020; the operative time was 324.80 ± 66.39 minutes. After improving several procedures of the technique, the "optimized method" was performed on 14 cases from July 2020 to November 2020; the operative time decreased to 193.71 ± 28.75 minutes with shortest was 133 minutes; the optimized method was novel and easy to learn and be generalized. Most of the patients were satisfied with the reconstruction results. There was no significant difference between preoperative scores and scores at 3 months, 6 months and 12 months (p = 0.364). Since there is no wound on the breast dome, no obvious postoperative complications were observed except for one patient presented with infection.ConclusionsThis new technique has allowed surgeons to achieve excellent and reproducible outcomes in a single-stage procedure and represents an excellent technique for patients who wish to have a scarless and aesthetically pleasing appearance after mastectomy for breast cancer. This article also highlights the mean operative time (193.71 ± 28.75 minutes) that has been made possible with this new technique.Level of evidence vThis journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors http://www.springer.com/00266 .

Project description:IntroductionThe emphasis on aesthetic outcomes and quality of life (QoL) has motivated surgeons to develop skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy (SSM/ NSM) for breast cancer treatment or prevention. During the same operation, a so-called immediate breast reconstruction is performed. The breast can be reconstructed by positioning of a breast implant above (prepectoral) or below (subpectoral) the pectoralis major muscle or by using the patients' own tissue (autologous reconstruction). The optimal positioning of the implant prepectoral or subpectoral is currently not clear. Subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) is still standard care in many countries, but prepectoral IBBR is increasingly performed. This heterogeneity in breast reconstruction practice is calling for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) to guide treatment decisions.Methods and analysisInternational, pragmatic, multicentre, randomised, superiority trial. The primary objective of this trial is to test whether prepectoral IBBR provides better QoL with respect to long-term (24 months) physical well-being (chest) compared with subpectoral IBBR for patients undergoing SSM or NSM for prevention or treatment of breast cancer. Secondary objectives will compare prepectoral versus subpectoral IBBR in terms of safety, QoL and patient satisfaction, aesthetic outcomes and burden on patients. Total number of patients to be included: 372 (186 per arm).Ethics and disseminationThis study will be conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval has been obtained for the lead investigator's site by the Ethics Committee 'Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz' (2020-00256, 26 March 2020). The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed medical journal, independent of the results, following the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials standards for RCTs and good publication practice. Metadata describing the type, size and content of the datasets will be shared along with the study protocol and case report forms on public repositories adhering to the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reuse) principles.Trial registration numberNCT04293146.

Dataset Information

Data on distant metastasis and survival after locoregional recurrence following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Publications

Data on distant metastasis and survival after locoregional recurrence following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets