Dataset Information

Deep learning-based unlearning of dataset bias for MRI harmonisation and confound removal.

ABSTRACT: Increasingly large MRI neuroimaging datasets are becoming available, including many highly multi-site multi-scanner datasets. Combining the data from the different scanners is vital for increased statistical power; however, this leads to an increase in variance due to nonbiological factors such as the differences in acquisition protocols and hardware, which can mask signals of interest. We propose a deep learning based training scheme, inspired by domain adaptation techniques, which uses an iterative update approach to aim to create scanner-invariant features while simultaneously maintaining performance on the main task of interest, thus reducing the influence of scanner on network predictions. We demonstrate the framework for regression, classification and segmentation tasks with two different network architectures. We show that not only can the framework harmonise many-site datasets but it can also adapt to many data scenarios, including biased datasets and limited training labels. Finally, we show that the framework can be extended for the removal of other known confounds in addition to scanner. The overall framework is therefore flexible and should be applicable to a wide range of neuroimaging studies.

SUBMITTER: Dinsdale NK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7903160 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Deep learning-based unlearning of dataset bias for MRI harmonisation and confound removal.

Dinsdale Nicola K NK Jenkinson Mark M Namburete Ana I L AIL

NeuroImage 20201230

Increasingly large MRI neuroimaging datasets are becoming available, including many highly multi-site multi-scanner datasets. Combining the data from the different scanners is vital for increased statistical power; however, this leads to an increase in variance due to nonbiological factors such as the differences in acquisition protocols and hardware, which can mask signals of interest. We propose a deep learning based training scheme, inspired by domain adaptation techniques, which uses an iter ...[more]

PMID: 33385551

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Quantitative myocardial perfusion cardiac MRI can provide a fast and robust assessment of myocardial perfusion status for the noninvasive diagnosis of myocardial ischemia while being more objective than visual assessment. However, it currently has limited use in clinical practice due to the challenging postprocessing required, particularly the segmentation. PURPOSE:To evaluate the efficacy of an automated deep learning (DL) pipeline for image processing prior to quantitative analysis. STUDY TYPE:Retrospective. POPULATION:In all, 175 (350 MRI scans; 1050 image series) clinical patients under both rest and stress conditions (135/10/30 training/validation/test). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE:3.0T/2D multislice saturation recovery T1 -weighted gradient echo sequence. ASSESSMENT:Accuracy was assessed, as compared to the manual operator, through the mean square error of the distance between landmarks and the Dice similarity coefficient of the segmentation and bounding box detection. Quantitative perfusion maps obtained using the automated DL-based processing were compared to the results obtained with the manually processed images. STATISTICAL TESTS:Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used to assess the myocardial blood flow (MBF) obtained using the automated DL pipeline, as compared to values obtained by a manual operator. RESULTS:The mean (SD) error in the detection of the time of peak signal enhancement in the left ventricle was 1.49 (1.4) timeframes. The mean (SD) Dice similarity coefficients for the bounding box and myocardial segmentation were 0.93 (0.03) and 0.80 (0.06), respectively. The mean (SD) error in the RV insertion point was 2.8 (1.8) mm. The Bland-Altman plots showed a bias of 2.6% of the mean MBF between the automated and manually processed MBF values on a per-myocardial segment basis. The ICC was 0.89, 95% confidence interval = [0.87, 0.90]. DATA CONCLUSION:We showed high accuracy, compared to manual processing, for the DL-based processing of myocardial perfusion data leading to quantitative values that are similar to those achieved with manual processing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1689-1696.

Dataset Information

Deep learning-based unlearning of dataset bias for MRI harmonisation and confound removal.

Publications

Deep learning-based unlearning of dataset bias for MRI harmonisation and confound removal.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets