Meniscus Repair With Anterior Cord Release for Peripheral Tear Type of Discoid Lateral Meniscus.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Suzuki T
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7917086 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Meniscal tears are among the most commonly diagnosed knee injuries and often require surgical intervention. Understanding the types of meniscal tears and treatment options is paramount to caring for the young athlete. Sports medicine and arthroscopic physicians now recognize that meniscal preservation in the young athlete is essential to the long-term health and function of the knee. Although uncommon, the discoid lateral meniscus is more prone to injury because of its increased thickness and lack of blood supply. Because of the abnormal development, the peripheral attachments are frequently absent and instability often persists after a partial meniscectomy. If the instability is unrecognized during the initial treatment, a recurrence of pain and mechanical symptoms is likely and a subsequent subtotal meniscectomy may be the only treatment option. With increased awareness, arthroscopic saucerization accompanied by arthroscopically assisted inside-out meniscal repair is a preferable treatment option with an excellent outcome.
| S-EPMC4454895 | biostudies-other
Project description:Lateral meniscus (LM) posterior root tear (LMPRT) is mainly caused by trauma, especially trauma associated with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Although a transtibial pullout repair or a side-to-side repair is commonly performed for LMPRT, to the best of our knowledge, there is no clinical report of LMPRT with tissue loss using the pullout technique. Thus, the purpose of this report was to describe a clinical, radiographic, and arthroscopic outcome after pullout repair for a case of LMPRT with a large defect with a chronic ACL tear and complex medial meniscus (MM) tears. A 31-year-old man complained of knee pain and restricted range of motion after twisting his knee when he stepped on an iron pipe. The patient had a football-related injury to his right knee 14 years before presentation, and since then, the patient's knee has given out more than 10 times but was left unassessed. Magnetic resonance imaging showed LMPRT with tissue loss, ACL tears, and complex MM tears. Transtibial pullout repair of the LMPRT with ACL reconstruction and MM repairs were performed. Following the pullout repair of the LMPRT, an approximately 6 mm gap remained between the LM posterior root and root insertion. However, magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy at 1 year postoperatively revealed meniscal healing, gap filling with some regeneration tissue, of the LM posterior root. Furthermore, the lateral meniscus extrusion in the coronal plane improved from 3.1 mm (preoperative) to 1.6 mm (1 year postoperatively). Transtibial pullout repair with the remaining gap could be a viable treatment option for LMPRT with tissue loss, combined with ACL reconstruction.
| S-EPMC9453023 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe describe a special, interesting phenomenon found in the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus (AHLM): most tear patterns in the AHLM are distinctive, with loose fibers in injured region and circumferential fiber bundles were separated. We name it as macerated tear. The goal of this study was to bring forward a new type of meniscal tear in the AHLM and investigate its clinical value.Materials and methodsAHLM tears underwent arthroscopic surgery from January 2012 to December 2014 were included. Data regarding the integrity of AHLM were prospectively recorded in a data registry. Tear morphology and treatment received were subsequently extracted by 2 independent reviewers from operative notes and arthroscopic surgical photos.ResultsA total of 60 AHLM tears in 60 patients (mean age 27.1 years) were grouped into horizontal tears (n = 15, 25%), vertical tears (n = 14, 23%), complex tears (n = 6, 10%), and macerated tears (n = 25, 42%). There were 6 patients with AHLM cysts in macerated tear group and one patient in vertical tear group. 60 patients were performed arthroscopic meniscus repairs and were followed-up with averaged 18.7 months. Each group had significant postoperative improvement in Lysholm and IKDC scores (p < 0.05). However, the macerated tear group showed least functional recovery of Lysholm and IKDC scores compared to other groups (p < 0.05). In addition, there were no differences in postoperative range of motion, return to work, or return to sport/other baseline activities between the four groups (p > 0.05).ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that the macerated tear is common in the tear pattern of AHLM. However, feasibility of the treatment of this type of meniscal tear, especially the meniscus repairs still requires further study.
| S-EPMC5268414 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Preservation of the meniscus has been shown to influence the progression of degenerative changes of the knee. As more meniscus is preserved, the propensity for development of osteoarthritis is lessened. Surgical treatment of a torn discoid meniscus has typically been a subtotal meniscectomy or partial meniscectomy. Similar to tears of a normal meniscus, partial meniscectomy compared with subtotal meniscectomy of the discoid meniscus confers better long-term results. With the abnormal morphology predisposing the discoid meniscus to tearing, several characteristic tear patterns can be observed-the horizontal tear being commonly encountered. We present a technique that not only creates a more normal morphology of a discoid meniscus but also preserves the tissue by using an all-inside, intrameniscal repair technique. This technique restores the central rim of the meniscus in the setting of a horizontal cleavage plane, thus restoring a more normal meniscus morphology.
| S-EPMC5622308 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Large posterolateral corner loss type of discoid lateral meniscus tear is unsalvageable. Therefore, subtotal meniscectomy has been the only treatment option in this case. However, long-term results of subtotal or total meniscectomy have shown a high prevalence of early degenerative changes. Persistent symptoms, such as increased pain, snapping, giving way, locking, and limited extension, can be attributed to progressive loss of posterior tibial meniscal attachment and meniscal degeneration, especially in the posterior horn. The purpose of this technique-based article is to describe a partial repair, posterior horn repair augmented with the central portion of the discoid lateral meniscus that would have been removed if a subtotal meniscectomy were performed and bone marrow stimulation in the intercondylar notch to improve meniscal healing.
| S-EPMC6408741 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is a common anatomic variant in the knee typically presented in young populations, with a greater incidence in the Asian population than in other populations. As DLM is a congenital anomaly, the ultrastructural features and morphology differ from those of the normal meniscus, potentially leading to meniscal tears. Snapping and pain are common symptoms, with occasional limitations of extension, in patients with DLM. Examination of the contralateral knee is necessary as DLM affects both knees. While simple radiographs may provide indirect signs of a DLM, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential for diagnosis and treatment planning. Although DLM was traditionally classified into three categories, namely, complete, incomplete, and Wrisberg DLM, a recent MRI classification provides useful information for surgical planning because the MRI classification was based on the peripheral detachment in patients with DLM, as follows: no shift, anterocentral shift, posterocentral shift, and central shift. Asymptomatic patients require close follow-up without surgical treatment, while patients with symptoms often require surgery. Total or subtotal meniscectomy, which has been traditionally performed, leads to an increased risk of degenerative arthritis; thus, partial meniscectomy is currently considered the treatment of choice for DLM. In addition to partial meniscectomy, meniscal repair of peripheral detachment is recommended for stabilization in patients with DLM to preserve the function of the meniscus. Previous studies have reported that partial meniscectomy with or without meniscal repair is effective and shows superior clinical and radiological outcomes to those of total or subtotal meniscectomy during the short- to long-term follow-up. Our preferred principle for DLM treatment is reduction, followed by reshaping with reference to the midbody of the medial meniscus and repair as firm as possible.
| S-EPMC7550551 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Arthroscopic repair of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus (LM) from an anterolateral portal has a risk of popliteal artery injury. Here, we present an ultrasound-assisted, arthroscopic, all-inside repair technique for a posterior LM tear to reduce the risk of neurovascular injury. An ultrasound probe covered with a sterile sleeve is placed horizontally at the popliteal fossa by an assistant surgeon, and the popliteal artery and posterior LM are confirmed. From the anterolateral portal, an arthroscopic probe is inserted to push the posterior capsule of the lateral compartment, while an ultrasound image detects the tip of the probe. After the probe is confirmed not to be directed toward the popliteal artery, an all-inside suture device is introduced from the anterolateral portal. While the meniscus is penetrated, the surgeon can confirm by ultrasound images that the needle is directed away from the popliteal artery. The guide suture is pulled anteriorly to secure the anchors tightly, and an ultrasound confirms that the anchors are positioned behind the posterior portion of the LM. All sutures are secured under the assistance of ultrasound images, followed by arthroscopic confirmation of a properly secured LM by the all-inside repair technique. Technique Video Video 1 The arthroscopic view from the anterolateral portal shows a decreased volume of the lateral meniscus due to a previous surgical resection. The posterior lateral meniscus (LM) is pulled anteriorly over the center of the lateral compartment by probing. The posterior LM is repaired under the guidance of the ultrasound by having the assistant surgeon place the ultrasound probe, covered with a sterile sleeve, horizontally on the popliteal fossa to allow confirmation of the posterior portion of the LM and the popliteal artery. An all-inside suture device, the JuggerStitch, is introduced from an anterolateral portal, and the tip of the needle is observed in the ultrasound image. While penetrating the posterior LM, the direction of the needle is confirmed not to injure the neurovascular structures. The anchor of the JuggerStich is introduced at the posterior side of the LM and can be observed as a high echoic region. After introduction of two anchors, the sutures are pulled anteriorly through the anterolateral portal, and the knot is tightened. The ultrasound image shows that the two anchors are positioned on the capsule behind the posterior LM. The same procedures are then repeated. The location of the popliteal artery and the direction of the needle are confirmed by ultrasound every time. If the needle is directed toward the artery, it should be extracted and inserted again. A total of 4 sutures are performed to obtain stability of the LM under the assistance of ultrasound. The final arthroscopic examination shows the properly secured repair and the stabilized posterior LM by probing.
| S-EPMC9134676 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) is more prone to injury than a normally shaped meniscus. Our previous study successfully identified the different cell types and their corresponding marker genes in meniscus tissues, but there was no study comparing the gene expression and cell heterogenicity of discoid meniscus with normal meniscus.
2023-12-06 | GSE162767 | GEO
Project description:Medial meniscal root tears are often disabling injuries that can occur in isolation during low-velocity, deep knee flexion maneuvers in middle-aged patients. The most common meniscal root tear pattern is a radial tear near the root attachment (type II). Root tears are often associated with meniscal extrusion, identified on magnetic resonance imaging. Relocation of the meniscal root to its anatomic center is a reported current difficulty faced by surgeons during surgical repair. However, this can be achieved via sufficient peripheral release of the posteromedial capsular attachment of the medial meniscus. The purpose of this Technical Note is to describe the authors' current surgical technique for medial meniscus root repair with a peripheral release for addressing meniscal extrusion. Classifications: level I (knee); level II (meniscus).
| S-EPMC6819748 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundOnly limited data are available regarding postural stability between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured patients with medial meniscus (MM) tear and those with lateral meniscus (LM) tear. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative postural stability for both involved and uninvolved knees in ACL rupture combined with MM and LM tears. It was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in postural stability between these two groups.MethodsNinety-three ACL-injured patients (53 combined with MM tears vs. 40 combined with LM tears) were included. Static and dynamic postural stability were evaluated with the overall stability index (OSI), anterior–posterior stability index (APSI), and medial–lateral stability index (MLSI) using stabilometry. Knee muscle strength was evaluated using an isokinetic testing device.ResultsIn the static postural stability test, none of the stability indices showed significant differences between the two groups for both knees (p?>?0.05). In the dynamic postural stability test for involved side knees, the OSI and APSI were significantly higher in the LM tear group compared to the MM tear group (OSI: 2.0?±?0.8 vs. 1.6?±?0.5, p?=?0.001; APSI: 1.5?±?0.6 vs. 1.3?±?0.5, p?=?0.023), but not the MLSI (p?>?0.05). In the static and dynamic postural stability tests in each group, there were no significant differences between the involved and uninvolved side knees (p?>?0.05). There was no significant difference in the knee muscle strength between the two groups (p?>?0.05). All postural stability showed no significant correlation with knee muscle strength (p?>?0.05).ConclusionDynamic postural stability was poorer in patients with ACL rupture combined with LM tear than in those with MM tear. Therefore, close monitoring for postural stability would be necessary during preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, especially for patients with ACL rupture combined with LM tear.Level of evidence: Level III
| S-EPMC7219227 | biostudies-literature