Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Probing the role of the right inferior frontal gyrus during Pain-Related empathy processing: Evidence from fMRI and TMS.


ABSTRACT: Recent studies have suggested that the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) may be involved in pain-related empathy. To verify the role of the rIFG, we performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment to replicate previous research and further designed a noninvasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) experiment to probe the causal role of the rIFG in pain-related empathy processing. We assigned 74 volunteers (37 females) to three groups. Group 1 (n = 26) performed a task in which participants were required to perceive pain in others (task of pain: TP) and we used fMRI to observe the activity of the rIFG during pain-related empathy processing. Then, we applied online rTMS to the rIFG and the vertex site (as reference site) to observe the performance of Group 2 (n = 24; performing TP) and Group 3 (n = 24; performing a control task of identifying body parts; task of body: TB). fMRI experiment demonstrated stronger activation in the rIFG than in the vertex during the perception of pain in others (p?

SUBMITTER: Li Y 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7927301 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Probing the role of the right inferior frontal gyrus during Pain-Related empathy processing: Evidence from fMRI and TMS.

Li Yun Y   Li Wenjuan W   Zhang Tingting T   Zhang Junjun J   Jin Zhenlan Z   Li Ling L  

Human brain mapping 20201207 5


Recent studies have suggested that the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) may be involved in pain-related empathy. To verify the role of the rIFG, we performed a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) experiment to replicate previous research and further designed a noninvasive repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) experiment to probe the causal role of the rIFG in pain-related empathy processing. We assigned 74 volunteers (37 females) to three groups. Group 1 (n = 26) perfor  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5830458 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7171374 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8096430 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7683712 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3948509 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2788150 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2588614 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6414400 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7250280 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6615546 | biostudies-literature