Are In Vitro Human Blood-Brain-Tumor-Barriers Suitable Replacements for In Vivo Models of Brain Permeability for Novel Therapeutics?
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
High grade gliomas (HGG) are incapacitating and prematurely fatal diseases. To overcome the poor prognosis, novel therapies must overcome the selective and restricted permeability of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This study critically evaluated whether in vitro human normal BBB and tumor BBB (BBTB) are suitable alternatives to "gold standard" in vivo models to determine brain permeability.Methods
A systematic review utilizing the PRISMA guidelines used English and full-text articles from the past 5 years in the PubMed, Embase, Medline and Scopus databases. Experimental studies employing human cell lines were included.Results
Of 1335 articles, the search identified 24 articles for evaluation after duplicates were removed. Eight in vitro and five in vivo models were identified with the advantages and disadvantages compared within and between models, and against patient clinical data where available. The greatest in vitro barrier integrity and stability, comparable to in vivo and clinical permeability data, were achieved in the presence of all cell types of the neurovascular unit: endothelial cells, astrocytes/glioma cells, pericytes and neurons.Conclusions
In vitro co-culture BBB models utilizing stem cell-derived or primary cells are a suitable proxy for brain permeability studies in order to reduce animal use in medical research.
SUBMITTER: Prashanth A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7956470 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a major obstacle for drug delivery to the brain. To seek for in vitro BBB models that are more accessible than animals for investigating drug transport across the BBB, we compared four in vitro cultured cell models: endothelial monoculture (bEnd3 cell line), coculture of bEnd3 and primary rat astrocytes (coculture), coculture with collagen type I and IV mixture, and coculture with Matrigel. The expression of the BBB tight junction proteins in these in vitro models was assessed using RT-PCR and immunofluorescence. We also quantified the hydraulic conductivity (L (p)), transendothelial electrical resistance (TER) and diffusive solute permeability (P) of these models to three solutes: TAMRA, Dextran 10K and Dextran 70K. Our results show that L (p) and P of the endothelial monoculture and coculture models are not different from each other. Compared with in vivo permeability data from rat pial microvessels, P of the endothelial monoculture and coculture models are not significantly different from in vivo data for Dextran 70K, but they are 2-4 times higher for TAMRA and Dextran 10K. This suggests that the endothelial monoculture and all of the coculture models are fairly good models for studying the transport of relatively large solutes across the BBB.
| S-EPMC4157339 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe blood-brain and blood-tumor barriers (BBB and BTB), which restrict the entry of most drugs into the brain and tumor, respectively, are a significant challenge in the treatment of glioblastoma. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive surgical technique increasingly used clinically for tumor cell ablation. Recent evidence suggests that LITT might locally disrupt BBB integrity, creating a potential therapeutic window of opportunity to deliver otherwise brain-impermeant agents.MethodsWe established a LITT mouse model to test if laser therapy can increase BBB/BTB permeability in vivo. Mice underwent orthotopic glioblastoma tumor implantation followed by LITT in combination with BBB tracers or the anticancer drug doxorubicin. BBB/BTB permeability was measured using fluorimetry, microscopy, and immunofluorescence. An in vitro endothelial cell model was also used to corroborate findings.ResultsLITT substantially disrupted the BBB and BTB locally, with increased permeability up to 30 days after the intervention. Remarkably, molecules as large as human immunoglobulin extravasated through blood vessels and permeated laser-treated brain tissue and tumors. Mechanistically, LITT decreased tight junction integrity and increased brain endothelial cell transcytosis. Treatment of mice bearing glioblastoma tumors with LITT and adjuvant doxorubicin, which is typically brain-impermeant, significantly increased animal survival.ConclusionsTogether, these results suggest that LITT can locally disrupt the BBB and BTB, enabling the targeted delivery of systemic therapies, including, potentially, antibody-based agents.
| S-EPMC7344247 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Assessing drug permeability across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is important when evaluating the abuse potential of new pharmaceuticals as well as developing novel therapeutics that target central nervous system disorders. One of the gold-standard in vivo methods for determining BBB permeability is rodent log BB; however, like most in vivo methods, it is time-consuming and expensive. In the present study, two statistical-based quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were developed to predict BBB permeability of drugs based on their chemical structure. The in vivo BBB permeability data were harvested for 921 compounds from publicly available literature, non-proprietary drug approval packages, and University of Washington's Drug Interaction Database. The cross-validation performance statistics for the BBB models ranged from 82 to 85% in sensitivity and 80-83% in negative predictivity. Additionally, the performance of newly developed models was assessed using an external validation set comprised of 83 chemicals. Overall, performance of individual models ranged from 70 to 75% in sensitivity, 70-72% in negative predictivity, and 78-86% in coverage. The predictive performance was further improved to 93% in coverage by combining predictions across the two software programs. These new models can be rapidly deployed to predict blood brain barrier permeability of pharmaceutical candidates and reduce the use of experimental animals.
| S-EPMC9633177 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The brain is characterized by an extremely rich blood supply, regulated by changes in blood vessel diameter and blood flow, depending on metabolic demands. The blood-brain barrier (BBB)-a functional and structural barrier separating the intravascular and neuropil compartments-characterizes the brain's vascular bed and is essential for normal brain functions. Disruptions to the regional cerebral blood supply, to blood drainage and to BBB properties have been described in most common neurological disorders, but there is a lack of quantitative methods for assessing blood flow dynamics and BBB permeability in small blood vessels under both physiological and pathological conditions. Here, we present a quantitative image analysis approach that allows the characterization of relative changes in the regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) and BBB properties in small surface cortical vessels. In experiments conducted using the open window technique in rats, a fluorescent tracer was injected into the tail vein, and images of the small vessels at the surface of the cortex were taken using a fast CCD camera. Pixel-based image analysis included registration and characterization of the changes in fluorescent intensity, followed by cluster analysis. This analysis enabled the characterization of rCBF in small arterioles and venules and changes in BBB permeability. The method was implemented successfully under experimental conditions, including increased rCBF induced by neural stimulation, bile salt-induced BBB breakdown, and photothrombosis-mediated local ischemia. The new approach may be used to study changes in rCBF, neurovascular coupling and BBB permeability under normal and pathological brain conditions.
| S-EPMC3646266 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The development of effective central nervous system (CNS) drugs has been hampered by the lack of robust strategies to mimic the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and cerebrovascular impairments in vitro. Recent technological advancements in BBB modeling using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) allowed to overcome some of these obstacles, nonetheless the pertinence for their use in drug permeation study remains to be established. This mandatory information requires a cross comparison of in vitro and in vivo pharmacokinetic data in the same species to avoid failure in late clinical drug development. Here, we measured the BBB permeabilities of 8 clinical positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands with known pharmacokinetic parameters in human brain in vivo with a newly developed in vitro iPSC-based human BBB (iPSC-hBBB) model. Our findings showed a good correlation between in vitro and in vivo drug brain permeability (R2 = 0.83; P = 0.008) which contrasted with the limited correlation between in vitro apparent permeability for a set of 18 CNS/non-CNS compounds using the in vitro iPSCs-hBBB model and drug physicochemical properties. Our data suggest that the iPSC-hBBB model can be integrated in a flow scheme of CNS drug screening and potentially used to study species differences in BBB permeation.
| S-EPMC6831611 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The strong barrier function of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) protects the central nervous system (CNS) from xenobiotic substances, while the expression of selective transporters controls the transportation of nutrients between the blood and brain. As a result, the delivery of drugs to the CNS and prediction of the ability of specific drugs to penetrate the BBB can be difficult. Although in vivo pharmacokinetic analysis using rodents is a commonly used method for predicting human BBB permeability, novel in vitro BBB models, such as Transwell models, have been developed recently. Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) have the potential to differentiate into various types of cells, and protocols for the differentiation of iPSCs to generate brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) have been reported. The use of iPSCs makes it easy to scale-up iPSC-derived BMECs (iBMECs) and enables production of BBB disease models by using iPSCs from multiple donors with disease, which are advantageous properties compared with models that utilize primary BMECs (pBMECs). There has been little research on the value of iBMECs for predicting BBB permeability. This study focused on the similarity of iBMECs to pBMECs and investigated the ability of iPSC-BBB models (monoculture and coculture) to predict in vivo human BBB permeability using iBMECs. iBMECs express BMEC markers (e.g., VE-cadherin and claudin-5) and influx/efflux transporters (e.g., Glut-1, SLC7A5, CD220, P-gp, ABCG2, and MRP-1) and exhibit high barrier function (transendothelial electrical resistance, >1000 ??×?cm2) as well as similar transporter expression profiles to pBMECs. We determined that the efflux activity using P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter is not sufficient in iBMECs, while in drug permeability tests, iPSC-derived BBB models showed a higher correlation with in vivo human BBB permeability compared with a rat BBB model and the Caco-2 model. In a comparison between monoculture and coculture models, the coculture BBB model showed higher efflux activity for compounds with low CNS permeability (e.g., verapamil and thioridazine). In conclusion, iPSC-BBB models make it possible to predict BBB permeability, and employing coculturing can improve iPSC-BBB function.
| S-EPMC6854432 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The goals of the present study were to apply a generalized regression model and support vector machine (SVM) models with Shape Signatures descriptors, to the domain of blood-brain barrier (BBB) modeling.The Shape Signatures method is a novel computational tool that was used to generate molecular descriptors utilized with the SVM classification technique with various BBB datasets. For comparison purposes we have created a generalized linear regression model with eight MOE descriptors and these same descriptors were also used to create SVM models.The generalized regression model was tested on 100 molecules not in the model and resulted in a correlation r2 = 0.65. SVM models with MOE descriptors were superior to regression models, while Shape Signatures SVM models were comparable or better than those with MOE descriptors. The best 2D shape signature models had 10-fold cross validation prediction accuracy between 80-83% and leave-20%-out testing prediction accuracy between 80-82% as well as correctly predicting 84% of BBB+ compounds (n = 95) in an external database of drugs.Our data indicate that Shape Signatures descriptors can be used with SVM and these models may have utility for predicting blood-brain barrier permeation in drug discovery.
| S-EPMC2803117 | biostudies-other
Project description:Efficient delivery of therapeutics across the neuroprotective blood-brain barrier (BBB) remains a formidable challenge for central nervous system drug development. High-fidelity in vitro models of the BBB could facilitate effective early screening of drug candidates targeting the brain. In this study, we developed a microfluidic BBB model that is capable of mimicking in vivo BBB characteristics for a prolonged period and allows for reliable in vitro drug permeability studies under recirculating perfusion. We derived brain microvascular endothelial cells (BMECs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and cocultured them with rat primary astrocytes on the two sides of a porous membrane on a pumpless microfluidic platform for up to 10 days. The microfluidic system was designed based on the blood residence time in human brain tissues, allowing for medium recirculation at physiologically relevant perfusion rates with no pumps or external tubing, meanwhile minimizing wall shear stress to test whether shear stress is required for in vivo-like barrier properties in a microfluidic BBB model. This BBB-on-a-chip model achieved significant barrier integrity as evident by continuous tight junction formation and in vivo-like values of trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER). The TEER levels peaked above 4000 Ω · cm2 on day 3 on chip and were sustained above 2000 Ω · cm2 up to 10 days, which are the highest sustained TEER values reported in a microfluidic model. We evaluated the capacity of our microfluidic BBB model to be used for drug permeability studies using large molecules (FITC-dextrans) and model drugs (caffeine, cimetidine, and doxorubicin). Our analyses demonstrated that the permeability coefficients measured using our model were comparable to in vivo values. Our BBB-on-a-chip model closely mimics physiological BBB barrier functions and will be a valuable tool for screening of drug candidates. The residence time-based design of a microfluidic platform will enable integration with other organ modules to simulate multi-organ interactions on drug response. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;114: 184-194. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
| S-EPMC6650146 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) limits the delivery of therapies into the brain. There has been significant interest in overcoming the BBB for the effective delivery of therapies to the brain. Inorganic nanomaterials, especially silica nanoparticles with varying surface chemistry and surface topology, have been recently used as permeation enhancers for oral protein delivery. In this context, nanoparticles with varying sizes and surface chemistries have been employed to overcome this barrier; however, there is no report examining the effect of nanoscale roughness on BBB permeability. This paper reports the influence of nanoscale surface roughness on the integrity and permeability of the BBB in vitro, using smooth surface Stöber silica nanoparticles (60 nm) compared to rough surface virus-like silica nanoparticles (VSNP, 60 nm). Our findings reveal that VSNP (1 mg/mL) with virus-mimicking-topology spiky surface have a greater effect on transiently opening endothelial tight junctions of the BBB than the same dose of Stöber silica nanoparticles (1 mg/mL) by increasing the FITC-Dextran (70 kDa) permeability 1.9-fold and by decreasing the trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) by 2.7-fold. This proof-of-concept research paves the way for future studies to develop next-generation tailored surface-modified silica nanoparticles, enabling safe and efficient macromolecule transport across the BBB.
| S-EPMC10536620 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Experimental Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) permeability models for drug molecules are expensive and time-consuming. As alternative methods, several traditional Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) models have been developed previously. In this study, we aimed to improve the predictivity of traditional QSAR BBB permeability models by employing relevant public bio-assay data in the modeling process.We compiled a BBB permeability database consisting of 439 unique compounds from various resources. The database was split into a modeling set of 341 compounds and a validation set of 98 compounds. Consensus QSAR modeling workflow was employed on the modeling set to develop various QSAR models. A five-fold cross-validation approach was used to validate the developed models, and the resulting models were used to predict the external validation set compounds. Furthermore, we used previously published membrane transporter models to generate relevant transporter profiles for target compounds. The transporter profiles were used as additional biological descriptors to develop hybrid QSAR BBB models.The consensus QSAR models have R(2) = 0.638 for five-fold cross-validation and R(2) = 0.504 for external validation. The consensus model developed by pooling chemical and transporter descriptors showed better predictivity (R(2) = 0.646 for five-fold cross-validation and R(2) = 0.526 for external validation). Moreover, several external bio-assays that correlate with BBB permeability were identified using our automatic profiling tool.The BBB permeability models developed in this study can be useful for early evaluation of new compounds (e.g., new drug candidates). The combination of chemical and biological descriptors shows a promising direction to improve the current traditional QSAR models.
| S-EPMC4529363 | biostudies-other