Dataset Information

A Principal Component of Quality of Life Measures Is Associated with Survival for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Radiation Therapy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) metrics can be associated with survival in head and neck cancer (HNC); however, the impact of HRQOL recovery and the relevant HRQOL domains regarding outcome are unclear.

Methods

Using a single-institution database, we retrospectively reviewed HNC patients treated with definitive or postoperative radiation therapy between 2013 and 2018. The recovery of individual HRQOL domains were determined by the ratio of the post-treatment to baseline scores. Univariate and Multivariate Cox regression were used to analyze survival outcomes. Principal component analysis was used to adjust for multicollinearity of HRQOL domains.

Results

In 218 HNC patients who received radiation therapy, median follow-up was 24.8 months (interquartile range (IQR) 14.5-32.0). Principal component analysis evaluating the recovery of HRQOL domains revealed two independent principal components (PC), PC1 and PC2. PC1, which received contributions from the functional domains; physical (PF), role (RF), emotional (EF), cognitive (CF), and global health status (GQOL) was significantly associated with disease-free (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.98, p = 0.034) and overall survival (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.65-0.91, p = 0.004) on multivariate analysis and PC2, had no correlation with outcome and was mainly represented by social functioning. Unplanned hospitalization was significantly associated with lower PC1 scores (β = -0.997, Std. Error = 0.244, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our study provides evidence that post-treatment recovery of HRQOL domains were associated with overall survival (OS) in HNC. PC1 is an attractive clinical tool to assess the recovery across multiple different HRQOL and the relationship with survival. Future prospective studies may identify patients who could benefit from additional rehabilitation based on PC1 score.

SUBMITTER: Farrugia M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7962523 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:(1) Background: Head and neck cancer treatment, including advanced techniques like Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), presents challenges for maintaining patient quality of life (QoL). Thus, thoroughly investigating how radiation therapy (RT) affects patients has been proved essential. Derived by that, this study aims to understand the complex interactions between not only RT and QoL but also symptom severity, and treatment-related toxicities in three distinct time points of patient's treatment; (2) Methods: To achieve that, EORTC-QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires were used in combination with EORTC_RTOG scoring criteria and Spearman's rho statistical analysis for 74 patients with cancer undergoing VMAT radiation therapy; (3) Results: The results revealed a significant improvement in the Overall Health Index post-treatment, indicating a temporary decline during therapy followed by subsequent recovery, often surpassing pre-treatment QoL levels. Concurrently a reduction in symptomatology was observed, notably in pain, swallowing difficulties, and dry mouth, aligning with prior research indicating decreased symptom burden post-treatment. However, Spearman's correlation coefficient analysis at two distinct time points during therapy uncovered varying degrees of correlation between dosimetric data at Organs at Risk (OARs) and reported symptoms, highlighting potential limitations in using QoL questionnaires as sole indicators of treatment efficacy. Our investigation into the correlation between dosimetric data, toxicity, and symptoms focused on the relationship between radiation doses and oral mucositis levels, a common toxicity in head and neck cancer patients. Significant associations were identified between toxicity levels and dosimetric parameters, particularly with OARs such as the parotid glands, oral cavity, and swallowing muscles, underlining the utility of the EORTC method as a reliable toxicity assessment tool; (4) Conclusions: To summarize, current research attempts to underscore the importance of refining QoL assessments for enhanced patient care. The integration of dosimetric data, symptom severity, and treatment-related toxicities in the QoL outcomes of head and neck cancer patients undergoing VMAT radiation therapy, can lead towards the optimization of treatment strategies and the improvement of patient outcomes in future patient-centered radiation therapy practices.

Project description:PurposeEpigenetic age acceleration (EAA) is robustly linked with mortality and morbidity. This study examined risk factors of EAA and its association with overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and quality of life (QOL) in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) receiving radiation therapy.Methods and materialsPatients without distant metastasis were enrolled and followed before and at the end of radiation therapy and at 6 and 12 months after radiation therapy. EAA was calculated with DNAmPhenoAge at all 4 time points. Risk factors included demographic characteristics, lifestyle, clinical characteristics, treatment-related symptoms, and blood biomarkers. Survival data were collected until August 2020, and QOL was measured using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-HNC.ResultsIncreased comorbidity, symptoms unrelated to human papilloma virus, and more severe treatment-related symptoms were associated with higher EAA (P = .03 to P < .001). A nonlinear association (quadratic) between body mass index (BMI) and EAA was observed: decreased BMI (<35 kg/m2; P = .04) and increased BMI (≥35 kg/m2; P = .01) were linked to higher EAA. Increased EAA (per year) was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.03-1.18; P = .004]; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.01-1.19; P = .02] for EAA at 6 and 12 months after treatment, respectively) and PFS (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.02-1.19; P = .02]; HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.06-1.23; P < .001]; and HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.14; P = .01]) for EAA before, immediately after, and 6 months after radiation therapy, respectively) and QOL over time (β = -0.61; P = .001). An average of 3.25 to 3.33 years of age acceleration across time, which was responsible for 33% to 44% higher HRs of OS and PFS, was observed in those who died or developed recurrence compared with those who did not (all P < .001).ConclusionsCompared with demographic and lifestyle factors, clinical characteristics were more likely to contribute to faster biological aging in patients with HNC. Acceleration in epigenetic age resulted in more aggressive adverse events, including OS and PFS. EAA could be considered as a marker for cancer outcomes, and decelerating aging could improve survival and QOL.

Project description:Exosomes are nanometer-sized extracellular vesicles that are believed to function as intercellular communicators. Here, we report that exosomes are able to modify the radiation response of the head and neck cancer cell lines BHY and FaDu. Exosomes were isolated from the conditioned medium of irradiated as well as non-irradiated head and neck cancer cells by serial centrifugation. Quantification using NanoSight technology indicated an increased exosome release from irradiated compared to non-irradiated cells 24 hours after treatment. To test whether the released exosomes influence the radiation response of other cells the exosomes were transferred to non-irradiated and irradiated recipient cells. We found an enhanced uptake of exosomes isolated from both irradiated and non-irradiated cells by irradiated recipient cells compared to non-irradiated recipient cells. Functional analyses by exosome transfer indicated that all exosomes (from non-irradiated and irradiated donor cells) increase the proliferation of non-irradiated recipient cells and the survival of irradiated recipient cells. The survival-promoting effects are more pronounced when exosomes isolated from irradiated compared to non-irradiated donor cells are transferred. A possible mechanism for the increased survival after irradiation could be the increase in DNA double-strand break repair monitored at 6, 8 and 10 h after the transfer of exosomes isolated from irradiated cells. This is abrogated by the destabilization of the exosomes. Our results demonstrate that radiation influences both the abundance and action of exosomes on recipient cells. Exosomes transmit prosurvival effects by promoting the proliferation and radioresistance of head and neck cancer cells. Taken together, this study indicates a functional role of exosomes in the response of tumor cells to radiation exposure within a therapeutic dose range and encourages that exosomes are useful objects of study for a better understanding of tumor radiation response.