Dataset Information

A Magic Bullet? The Potential Impact of E-Cigarettes on the Toll of Cigarette Smoking.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

We examine the proportion of US smoking-produced mortality that e-cigarettes might eliminate under assumptions regarding vaping's ability to increase smoking cessation, vaping's health risks, and the possibility that vaping will increase smoking among young people.

Methods

We employ a dynamic population simulation model that tracks individuals from ages 0 to 110, differentiated by gender and smoking status. Using data from the US Census, the National Vital Statistics Reports, Cancer Prevention Study II, and the National Health Interview Survey, we estimate the number of smoking-related life-years lost (LYL) from 2018 to 2100 in a no-vaping scenario. We then compare results for model runs that assess the impact of vaping under a variety of assumptions.

Results

The combination of assumptions produces 360 possible scenarios. 357 (99%) yield positive estimates of life-years saved (LYS) due to vaping by 2100, from 143 000 to 65 million. Most scenarios result in millions of individuals quitting smoking due to vaping. On average, vaping-induced quitters gain an extra 1.2-2.0 years of life compared to smokers who quit without vaping. The impact of vaping is greatest when it most helps smokers who otherwise have the greatest difficulty quitting smoking. While the numbers of LYS are generally large across all scenarios, they often represent a small fraction of the toll of smoking.

Conclusions

Vaping is highly likely to reduce smoking-produced mortality. Still, vaping is not "the" answer to the public health crisis created by smoking. Rather, it may well be a tool to add to the armamentarium of effective tobacco control measures.

Implications

E-cigarettes hold the potential to reduce cigarette smoking's enormous toll. By itself, however, tobacco harm reduction, as embodied in vaping, is no magic bullet. Going forward, tobacco control will require vigilant application of the evidence-based measures that have brought us so much success in combatting smoking. It will require, as well, the search for and adoption of novel means of attacking the remaining problem. Harm reduction can, and many would say should, be a part of the complex formula that will eventually bring about the demise of smoking.

SUBMITTER: Mendez D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7976928 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionTo inform policy making under the proposed The Control of Tobacco and Electronic Delivery Systems Bill, we compared annual costs of using e-cigarettes versus cigarettes, and estimated revenue from e-cigarette taxation.MethodsWe extracted e-cigarette retail prices from 231 South African e-cigarette vendor websites. We compared annual costs associated with daily cigarette smoking (self-reports from daily smokers in the 2018 South African Social Attitudes Survey, SASAS) versus daily e-cigarette use (based on cumulative costs of consumables plus device costs). We estimated revenue from excise tax if e-cigarettes were taxed at 75% (the rate proposed by the government) and 37.5% (half of the government's proposal as a hypothetical scenario) of the cigarette excise rate. We applied the different rates to e-cigarette consumption in 2018 SASAS and projected for 2021.ResultsMean annual cost associated with daily use was ZAR 6693 (US$460.32, based on an exchange rate of about 69 US$ to 1000 ZAR) for manufactured cigarettes; for e-cigarettes, this ranged from ZAR 8574.69/year (with price minimizing strategies) to ZAR 19780.83/year (retail products exclusively). Expected revenue from e-cigarette excise tax at 75% of the cigarette tax rate was up to ZAR 2.20 billion (95% CI: 0.96-3.44). If taxed at 37.5% of the cigarette tax rate - half of the government's proposed rate - the projected revenue was up to ZAR 1.10 billion (95% CI: 0.48-1.72). Of the projected revenue from e-cigarette excise tax at 75% of the cigarette rate, the portion attributable to hardware (device and batteries) was 61% (ZAR 1.35 billion), while the portion attributable to e-liquid was 39% (ZAR 0.86 billion).ConclusionsCalculated daily costs were higher for e-cigarettes than cigarettes. We recommend an e-cigarette excise tax. The government's proposed tax rate may reduce youth e-cigarette access, while allowing adult smokers wishing to switch exclusively to e-cigarettes to reduce their tobacco-related harm.