Dataset Information

Stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure according to heart failure type.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

This study aimed to elucidate the risk for stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure (HF) according to HF type.

Methods and results

A total of 10 780 patients with atrial fibrillation were enrolled in a multicentre prospective registry and divided according to HF type: no-HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction (EF) (HFpEF), HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). Each group included 237 age-matched and sex-matched patients (age, 69.0 ± 10.3 years; men, 69.6%). The baseline characteristics, cumulative incidence, and hazard ratios for stroke/SE and major bleeding were compared across the groups. Patients with HF accounted for 10.3% of the total population; HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF represented 43.7%, 23.6%, and 32.7% of the patients with HF, respectively. The CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score was significantly higher in the HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF groups than in the no-HF group. The annual stroke/SE incidence rates were 2.8%, 0.7%, 1.1%, and 0.9% in the HFpEF, HFmrEF, HFrEF, and no-HF groups, respectively. The cumulative incidence of stroke/SE was significantly highest in the HFpEF group at 22.8 ± 10.0 months (P = 0.020). The stroke/SE risk was higher in the HFpEF group than in the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups (hazard ratio, 3.192; 95% confidence interval, 1.039-9.810; P = 0.043). E/e' value was an independent risk factor for stroke/SE. There were no significant differences in the incidence of major bleeding across the groups.

Conclusions

The stroke/SE risk was the highest in the HFpEF group and comparable between the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups.

SUBMITTER: Uhm JS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8006674 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundNonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is an independent risk factor for ischemic stroke and is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and dialysis patients. The use of oral anticoagulation to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in the setting of kidney disease is controversial. Novel alternatives to vitamin K antagonists include left atrial appendage occlusion devices (LAAOD) and apixaban.ObjectiveWe sought to elicit Canadian nephrologist views regarding stroke and systemic embolism prevention therapies in CKD and dialysis patients with NVAF.DesignSurvey.SettingOnline via https://www.surveymonkey.com.ParticipantsCanadian Society of Nephrology members actively treating adult dialysis patients with NVAF.MeasurementsManagement questions were asked with response options consisting of a Likert scale ranging from 1 to 8 (with 1 being definitely would not and 8 being definitely would).MethodsWe randomly allocated each respondent to 2 of 4 cases that varied by stroke and bleeding risks (using varying CHADS2 and HASBLED scores, respectively).ResultsThere were 91 responses (36.3% response rate) from mostly university (83.5%) and also community with university affiliation (12.1%) and community (4.4%) nephrologists. Warfarin was more likely to be recommended in individuals at high stroke risk and low bleeding risk (mean = 5.47, 95% confidence interval = 4.87-6.07) and less likely to be recommended in individuals at moderate stroke risk and high bleeding risk (mean = 2.89, 95% confidence interval = 2.37-3.41). The likelihood of recommending LAAOD did not vary by stroke or bleeding risks (means ranging from 3.92-4.90). Apixaban was not likely to be recommended in any case (means ranging from 2.60-3.50). However, nephrologists felt there was equipoise regarding anticoagulation strategies allowing participation in appropriate randomized controlled trials (RCTs).LimitationsThe survey only involved nephrologists and only 4 cases with dichotomized risk categories were presented instead of complete range of stroke and bleeding risk combinations. As with any survey, there was the potential for responder bias and treatment decisions are not anchored directly to patient management.ConclusionsNephrologists caring for patients with kidney disease appear willing to include patients in clinical trials examining alternatives to warfarin for stroke and systemic embolism prevention for NVAF in the setting of kidney disease.