Dataset Information

A New Pathway to University Retention? Identity Fusion With University Predicts Retention Independently of Grades.

ABSTRACT: Individuals who are "strongly fused" with a group view the group as self-defining. As such, they should be particularly reluctant to leave it. For the first time, we investigate the implications of identity fusion for university retention. We found that students who were strongly fused with their university (+1 SD) were 7-9% points more likely than weakly fused students (-1SD) to remain in school up to a year later. Fusion with university predicted subsequent retention in four samples (N = 3,193) and held while controlling for demographics, personality, prior academic performance, and belonging uncertainty. Interestingly, fusion with university was largely unrelated to grades, suggesting that identity fusion provides a novel pathway to retention independent of established pathways like academic performance. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.

SUBMITTER: Talaifar S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8009486 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A New Pathway to University Retention? Identity Fusion With University Predicts Retention Independently of Grades.

Talaifar Sanaz S Ashokkumar Ashwini A Pennebaker James W JW Medrano Fortunato N FN Yeager David S DS Swann William B WB

Social psychological and personality science 20200219 1

Individuals who are "strongly fused" with a group view the group as self-defining. As such, they should be particularly reluctant to leave it. For the first time, we investigate the implications of identity fusion for university retention. We found that students who were strongly fused with their university (+1 <i>SD</i>) were 7-9% points more likely than weakly fused students (-1<i>SD</i>) to remain in school up to a year later. Fusion with university predicted subsequent retention in four samp ...[more]

PMID: 33796211

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundObesity, typically quantified in terms of Body Mass Index (BMI) exceeding threshold values, is considered a leading cause of premature death worldwide. For given body size (BMI), it is recognized that risk is also affected by body shape, particularly as a marker of abdominal fat deposits. Waist circumference (WC) is used as a risk indicator supplementary to BMI, but the high correlation of WC with BMI makes it hard to isolate the added value of WC.Methods and findingsWe considered a USA population sample of 14,105 non-pregnant adults (age ≥ 18) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2004 with follow-up for mortality averaging 5 yr (828 deaths). We developed A Body Shape Index (ABSI) based on WC adjusted for height and weight: ABSI ≡ WC/(BMI(2/3)height(1/2)). ABSI had little correlation with height, weight, or BMI. Death rates increased approximately exponentially with above average baseline ABSI (overall regression coefficient of +33% per standard deviation of ABSI [95% confidence interval: +20%-+48%), whereas elevated death rates were found for both high and low values of BMI and WC. 22% (8%-41%) of the population mortality hazard was attributable to high ABSI, compared to 15% (3%-30%) for BMI and 15% (4%-29%) for WC. The association of death rate with ABSI held even when adjusted for other known risk factors including smoking, diabetes, blood pressure, and serum cholesterol. ABSI correlation with mortality hazard held across the range of age, sex, and BMI, and for both white and black ethnicities (but not for Mexican ethnicity), and was not weakened by excluding deaths from the first 3 yr of follow-up.ConclusionsBody shape, as measured by ABSI, appears to be a substantial risk factor for premature mortality in the general population derivable from basic clinical measurements. ABSI expresses the excess risk from high WC in a convenient form that is complementary to BMI and to other known risk factors.

Project description:Introduction The management of spinal neoplasia consists of surgical, radiation, and systemic options. Little data exist to guide management based on overall health status, which is particularly challenging when patients who could benefit from surgery may be too frail for it. This study's objective was to evaluate the 5-Item Modified Frailty Index (mFI-5) as a predictor of 30-day morbidity in patients undergoing instrumented resection for metastatic extradural spinal tumors. Methods Adults undergoing extradural tumor resection from the 2011 to 2019 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program datasets were identified by Current Procedural Terminology codes 63275-63278 with an adjunct instrumentation code (22840-22843). Patients were classified into frailty levels 0, 1, or 2+ based on mFI-5 scores of 0, 1, or 2-5, respectively. The primary outcome was morbidity. Secondary outcomes were readmission and reoperation. Multivariate modeling was utilized to analyze mFI-5 as a predictor of outcomes. The Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to compare relative-model-fit based on frailty versus individual comorbidity variables to determine the optimal model. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests were used to establish significance between individual complications and frailty. Results There were 874 patients. Readmission, reoperation, and morbidity rates were 19.5%, 5.0%, 52.3%, respectively. In multivariate analyses, mFI-5=1 (OR: 1.45, SE: 0.31, p=0.036), mFI-5=2+ (OR: 1.41, SE: 0.40, p=0.036), operative time (OR: 1.18, SE: 0.03, p≤0.001), and chronic steroid use (OR: 1.56, SE: 0.42, p=0.037) independently predicted morbidity. Elective surgery (OR: 0.61) was protective. Frailty did not predict readmission or reoperation. Frailty was found to be significantly associated with respiratory complications, urinary tract infections, cardiac events, and sepsis/septic shock specifically. Conclusions mFI-5=1 independently predicted 45% increased odds of morbidity. mFI-5=2+ independently predicted 41% increased odds of morbidity. Further, every 30 additional minutes of operative time predicted 18% increased odds of morbidity, suggesting an increased risk of site-related complication events. Taken together, the mFI-5 serves as a valid predictor of morbidity in patients with extradural tumor undergoing instrumented excision.

Project description:ObjectiveTo explore university students' experience of retention and identify potential barriers and facilitators to long-term adherence.DesignCross-sectional qualitative study using virtual focus groups.SettingUniversity of Leeds.ParticipantsDental and non-dental students from the University of Leeds, who had previously undergone orthodontic treatment and had received removable retainers.MethodsStudents were invited to participate via email. Virtual focus groups were undertaken using Microsoft Teams. A topic guide was used to explore the experience of orthodontic retention including factors that influence long-term retainer wear. Focus groups were recorded and analysed using an inductive thematic approach.ResultsIn total, 23 students participated in four focus groups, including 13 dental students. The period since the end of orthodontic treatment varied from 9 months to 10 years. Of the 23 participants, 8 (35%) were no longer wearing their retainers. Four themes were identified: (1) experience of orthodontic treatment including knowledge of relapse; (2) experience of retainer wear, including motivators and barriers; (3) role of others; and (4) increasing adherence. Key factors influencing use of retainers were the importance placed on maintaining treatment outcomes, awareness of unwanted tooth movement and understanding of the role of the retainer, access to replacement retainers, and ongoing support to encourage retainer wear. Greater knowledge and dental awareness reported by dental students did not necessarily increase adherence.ConclusionAdherence to removable retainer wear is an important aspect of orthodontic treatment but it is recognised that long-term retainer wear is highly variable. The understanding of relapse and retention is variable. Challenges in gaining access to replacement retainers are a common cause of cessation of retainer wear. Dental professionals are perceived to be important in encouraging and supporting retainer wear and individuals reported they would like more follow-up.

Dataset Information

A New Pathway to University Retention? Identity Fusion With University Predicts Retention Independently of Grades.

Publications

A New Pathway to University Retention? Identity Fusion With University Predicts Retention Independently of Grades.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets