A Bayesian linear mixed model for prediction of complex traits.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Motivation
Accurate disease risk prediction is essential for precision medicine. Existing models either assume that diseases are caused by groups of predictors with small-to-moderate effects or a few isolated predictors with large effects. Their performance can be sensitive to the underlying disease mechanisms, which are usually unknown in advance.Results
We developed a Bayesian linear mixed model (BLMM), where genetic effects were modelled using a hybrid of the sparsity regression and linear mixed model with multiple random effects. The parameters in BLMM were inferred through a computationally efficient variational Bayes algorithm. The proposed method can resemble the shape of the true effect size distributions, captures the predictive effects from both common and rare variants, and is robust against various disease models. Through extensive simulations and the application to a whole-genome sequencing dataset obtained from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiatives, we have demonstrated that BLMM has better prediction performance than existing methods and can detect variables and/or genetic regions that are predictive.Availability
The R-package is available at https://github.com/yhai943/BLMM.Supplementary information
Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
SUBMITTER: Hai Y
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8016495 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Brain imaging outcomes are important for Alzheimer's disease (AD) detection, and their prediction based on both genetic and demographic risk factors can facilitate the ongoing prevention and treatment of AD. Existing studies have identified numerous significantly AD-associated SNPs. However, how to make the best use of them for prediction analyses remains unknown. In this research, we first explored the relationship between genetic architecture and prediction accuracy of linear mixed models via visualizing the Manhattan plots generated based on the data obtained from the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, and then constructed prediction models for eleven AD-related brain imaging outcomes using data from United Kingdom Biobank and Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative studies. We found that the simple Manhattan plots can be informative for the selection of prediction models. For traits that do not exhibit any significant signals from the Manhattan plots, the simple genomic best linear unbiased prediction (gBLUP) model is recommended due to its robust and accurate prediction performance as well as its computational efficiency. For diseases and traits that show spiked signals on the Manhattan plots, the latent Dirichlet process regression is preferred, as it can flexibly accommodate both the oligogenic and omnigenic models. For the prediction of AD-related traits, the Manhattan plots suggest their polygenic nature, and gBLUP has achieved robust performance for all these traits. We found that for these AD-related traits, genetic factors themselves only explain a very small proportion of the heritability, and the well-known AD risk factors can substantially improve the prediction model.
| S-EPMC9581223 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Linear mixed models (LMMs) and their extensions have been widely used for high-dimensional genomic data analyses. While LMMs hold great promise for risk prediction research, the high dimensionality of the data and different effect sizes of genomic regions bring great analytical and computational challenges. In this work, we present a multikernel linear mixed model with adaptive lasso (KLMM-AL) to predict phenotypes using high-dimensional genomic data. We develop two algorithms for estimating parameters from our model and also establish the asymptotic properties of LMM with adaptive lasso when only one dependent observation is available. The proposed KLMM-AL can account for heterogeneous effect sizes from different genomic regions, capture both additive and nonadditive genetic effects, and adaptively and efficiently select predictive genomic regions and their corresponding effects. Through simulation studies, we demonstrate that KLMM-AL outperforms most of existing methods. Moreover, KLMM-AL achieves high sensitivity and specificity of selecting predictive genomic regions. KLMM-AL is further illustrated by an application to the sequencing dataset obtained from the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative.
| S-EPMC8082466 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Precise prediction for genetic architecture of complex traits is impeded by the limited understanding on genetic effects of complex traits, especially on gene-by-gene (GxG) and gene-by-environment (GxE) interaction. In the past decades, an explosion of high throughput technologies enables omics studies at multiple levels (such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics). The analyses of large omics data, especially two-loci interaction analysis, are very time intensive. Integrating the diverse omics data and environmental effects in the analyses also remain challenges. We proposed mixed linear model approaches using GPU (Graphic Processing Unit) computation to simultaneously dissect various genetic effects. Analyses can be performed for estimating genetic main effects, GxG epistasis effects, and GxE environment interaction effects on large-scale omics data for complex traits, and for estimating heritability of specific genetic effects. Both mouse data analyses and Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated that genetic effects and environment interaction effects could be unbiasedly estimated with high statistical power by using the proposed approaches.
| S-EPMC5155518 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A widely used method for prediction of complex traits in animal and plant breeding is "genomic best linear unbiased prediction" (GBLUP). In a quantitative genetics setting, BLUP is a linear regression of phenotypes on a pedigree or on a genomic relationship matrix, depending on the type of input information available. Normality of the distributions of random effects and of model residuals is not required for BLUP but a Gaussian assumption is made implicitly. A potential downside is that Gaussian linear regressions are sensitive to outliers, genetic or environmental in origin. We present simple (relative to a fully Bayesian analysis) to implement robust alternatives to BLUP using a linear model with residual t or Laplace distributions instead of a Gaussian one, and evaluate the methods with milk yield records on Italian Brown Swiss cattle, grain yield data in inbred wheat lines, and using three traits measured on accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. The methods do not use Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and model hyper-parameters, viewed here as regularization "knobs," are tuned via some cross-validation. Uncertainty of predictions are evaluated by employing bootstrapping or by random reconstruction of training and testing sets. It was found (e.g., test-day milk yield in cows, flowering time and FRIGIDA expression in Arabidopsis) that the best predictions were often those obtained with the robust methods. The results obtained are encouraging and stimulate further investigation and generalization.
| S-EPMC6008589 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Gene discovery, estimation of heritability captured by SNP arrays, inference on genetic architecture and prediction analyses of complex traits are usually performed using different statistical models and methods, leading to inefficiency and loss of power. Here we use a Bayesian mixture model that simultaneously allows variant discovery, estimation of genetic variance explained by all variants and prediction of unobserved phenotypes in new samples. We apply the method to simulated data of quantitative traits and Welcome Trust Case Control Consortium (WTCCC) data on disease and show that it provides accurate estimates of SNP-based heritability, produces unbiased estimators of risk in new samples, and that it can estimate genetic architecture by partitioning variation across hundreds to thousands of SNPs. We estimated that, depending on the trait, 2,633 to 9,411 SNPs explain all of the SNP-based heritability in the WTCCC diseases. The majority of those SNPs (>96%) had small effects, confirming a substantial polygenic component to common diseases. The proportion of the SNP-based variance explained by large effects (each SNP explaining 1% of the variance) varied markedly between diseases, ranging from almost zero for bipolar disorder to 72% for type 1 diabetes. Prediction analyses demonstrate that for diseases with major loci, such as type 1 diabetes and rheumatoid arthritis, Bayesian methods outperform profile scoring or mixed model approaches.
| S-EPMC4388571 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) continue to grow in popularity due to their ability to directly acknowledge multiple levels of dependency and model different data types. For small sample sizes especially, likelihood-based inference can be unreliable with variance components being particularly difficult to estimate. A Bayesian approach is appealing but has been hampered by the lack of a fast implementation, and the difficulty in specifying prior distributions with variance components again being particularly problematic. Here, we briefly review previous approaches to computation in Bayesian implementations of GLMMs and illustrate in detail, the use of integrated nested Laplace approximations in this context. We consider a number of examples, carefully specifying prior distributions on meaningful quantities in each case. The examples cover a wide range of data types including those requiring smoothing over time and a relatively complicated spline model for which we examine our prior specification in terms of the implied degrees of freedom. We conclude that Bayesian inference is now practically feasible for GLMMs and provides an attractive alternative to likelihood-based approaches such as penalized quasi-likelihood. As with likelihood-based approaches, great care is required in the analysis of clustered binary data since approximation strategies may be less accurate for such data.
| S-EPMC2883299 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Motivation: Family-based study design is one of the popular designs used in genetic research, and the whole-genome sequencing data obtained from family-based studies offer many unique features for risk prediction studies. They can not only provide a more comprehensive view of many complex diseases, but also utilize information in the design to further improve the prediction accuracy. While promising, existing analytical methods often ignore the information embedded in the study design and overlook the predictive effects of rare variants, leading to a prediction model with sub-optimal performance. Results: We proposed a Bayesian linear mixed model for the prediction analysis of sequencing data obtained from family-based studies. Our method can not only capture predictive effects from both common and rare variants, but also easily accommodate various disease model assumptions. It uses information embedded in the study design to form surrogates, where the predictive effects from unmeasured/unknown genetic and environmental risk factors can be modelled. Through extensive simulation studies and the analysis of sequencing data obtained from the Michigan State University Twin Registry study, we have demonstrated that the proposed method outperforms commonly adopted techniques. Availability: R package is available at https://github.com/yhai943/FBLMM.
| S-EPMC10620972 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Despite important advances from Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS), for most complex human traits and diseases, a sizable proportion of genetic variance remains unexplained and prediction accuracy (PA) is usually low. Evidence suggests that PA can be improved using Whole-Genome Regression (WGR) models where phenotypes are regressed on hundreds of thousands of variants simultaneously. The Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (G-BLUP, a ridge-regression type method) is a commonly used WGR method and has shown good predictive performance when applied to plant and animal breeding populations. However, breeding and human populations differ greatly in a number of factors that can affect the predictive performance of G-BLUP. Using theory, simulations, and real data analysis, we study the performance of G-BLUP when applied to data from related and unrelated human subjects. Under perfect linkage disequilibrium (LD) between markers and QTL, the prediction R-squared (R(2)) of G-BLUP reaches trait-heritability, asymptotically. However, under imperfect LD between markers and QTL, prediction R(2) based on G-BLUP has a much lower upper bound. We show that the minimum decrease in prediction accuracy caused by imperfect LD between markers and QTL is given by (1-b)(2), where b is the regression of marker-derived genomic relationships on those realized at causal loci. For pairs of related individuals, due to within-family disequilibrium, the patterns of realized genomic similarity are similar across the genome; therefore b is close to one inducing small decrease in R(2). However, with distantly related individuals b reaches very low values imposing a very low upper bound on prediction R(2). Our simulations suggest that for the analysis of data from unrelated individuals, the asymptotic upper bound on R(2) may be of the order of 20% of the trait heritability. We show how PA can be enhanced with use of variable selection or differential shrinkage of estimates of marker effects.
| S-EPMC3708840 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 provided a platform for evaluating genomic prediction power based on single-nucleotide polymorphisms from single-nucleotide polymorphism array data and sequencing data. Also, Genetic Analysis Workshop 18 provided a diverse pedigree structure to be explored in prediction. In this study, we attempted to combine pedigree information with single-nucleotide polymorphism data to predict systolic blood pressure. Our results suggested that the prediction power based on pedigree information only could be unsatisfactory. Using additional information such as single-nucleotide polymorphism genotypes would improve prediction accuracy. In particular, the improvement can be significant when there exist a few single-nucleotide polymorphisms with relatively larger effect sizes. We also compared the prediction performance based on genome-wide association study data (ie, common variants) and sequencing data (ie, common variants plus low-frequency variants). The experimental result showed that inclusion of low frequency variants could not lead to improvement of prediction accuracy.
| S-EPMC4143686 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We consider the problems of hypothesis testing and model comparison under a flexible Bayesian linear regression model whose formulation is closely connected with the linear mixed effect model and the parametric models for Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) set analysis in genetic association studies. We derive a class of analytic approximate Bayes factors and illustrate their connections with a variety of frequentist test statistics, including the Wald statistic and the variance component score statistic. Taking advantage of Bayesian model averaging and hierarchical modeling, we demonstrate some distinct advantages and flexibilities in the approaches utilizing the derived Bayes factors in the context of genetic association studies. We demonstrate our proposed methods using real or simulated numerical examples in applications of single SNP association testing, multi-locus fine-mapping and SNP set association testing.
| S-EPMC4570575 | biostudies-literature