Dataset Information

Adrenal artery ablation for primary aldosteronism without apparent aldosteronoma: An efficacy and safety, proof-of-principle trial.

ABSTRACT: Primary aldosteronism (PA) is associated with resistant hypertension and cardiovascular events. There are some limitations of current medical and surgical therapies for PA. To determine the efficacy and safety of catheter-based adrenal artery ablation for treatment of PA patients who refused both surgery and medical therapy, we performed this prospective cohort study. Thirty-six PA patients without apparent aldosteronoma were treated by adrenal artery ablation. Primary outcome was postoperative blood pressure and defined daily dose (DDD) of antihypertensive medications after adrenal ablation. Secondary outcome was biochemical success. We assessed outcomes based on Primary Aldosteronism Surgical Outcome (PASO) criteria. Adrenal CT scan, biochemical evaluation, adrenal artery ablation and adrenal venous sampling (AVS) were underwent. After adrenal ablation, complete clinical success (normotension without antihypertensive medication) was achieved in 9/36 (25.0%) patients and partial clinical success (reduction in blood pressure or less antihypertensive medication) in 13/36 (36.1%) patients. Complete biochemical success (correction of hypokalemia and normalization of aldosterone-to-renin ratio) was achieved in 16/36 (44.4%) patients. Office-based and ambulatory blood pressures were reduced by 17/7 and 11/2 mmHg at 6 months after ablation, respectively. The plasma cortisol level in the ablation group decreased slightly, but no patient developed hypoadrenocorticism. Catheter-based adrenal ablation appears to produce substantial and sustained blood pressure reduction and biochemical improvement, with only minor adverse events in PA patients without apparent aldosteronoma. This therapy could be an important supplement for current PA treatments.

SUBMITTER: Zhang H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8029691 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:In this work we demonstrate a novel method of methylation detection that utilises immunoaffinity to detect the presence of methylated DNA hybridised to a cDNA microarray. We use a monoclonal antibody specific to 5 methylcytosine to detect the presence of 5 methylcytosine in genomic DNA from human fibroblasts bearing the karyotype 45 XO. We report that over 2900 genes show the presence of methylation in this condition. We also report that 165 genes are consistently methylated in all replicates of these experiments. The methylated genes show a uniform distribution over all the chromosomes. The gene ontology of these also indicates no functional correlation between the genes that are methylated. We detect the presence of methylation in IGF2, an imprinted gene and thus known to harbour DNA methylation. The method is extremely specific and offers a quick and efficient way to analyse the methylation landscape on a high throughput scale. This method uses existing technology to assess methylation and thus can integrate very efficiently into any platform used. A method that detects DNA methylation that is not restricted to specific sequences would provide a useful platform to analyse methylation distribution among the genes in any given phenotypic condition.Availability of additional approaches to examine DNA methylation would lead to increase in our understanding of the methylome and would help define the intrinsic and extrinsic factors which govern it. Microarray based high throughput methods have been extensively used for gene expression analysis. The method described uses a microarray to analyse DNA methylation levels in a gene/cDNA/oligo specific manner. Here, genomic DNA is fragmented and used for hybridization to microarray slides. The presence of DNA cytosine methylation in the hybridized DNA is detected by employing Cy3 labelled anti 5mC( 5-methyl cytidine) antibody (monoclonal). The resolution provided by this method is dependent upon the microarray platform used. This method can be adapted to any platform thus enabling seamless integration with existing technology of gene expression analysis

Project description:BACKGROUND:Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) can inhibit recurrent ischemic events effectively in patients with acute or chronic cerebral ischemia. However, it is still unclear whether RIPC can impede ischemic injury after carotid artery stenting (CAS) in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. METHODS:Subjects with severe carotid artery stenosis were recruited in this randomized controlled study, and assigned to RIPC, sham, and no intervention (control) groups. All subjects received standard medical therapy. Subjects in the RIPC and sham groups underwent RIPC and sham RIPC twice daily, respectively, for 2 weeks before CAS. Plasma neuron-specific enolase and S-100B were used to evaluate safety, hypersensitive C-reactive protein, and new ischemic diffusion-weighted imaging lesions were used to determine treatment efficacy. The primary outcomes were the presence of ?1 newly ischemic brain lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging within 48 hours after stenting and clinical events within 6 months after stenting. RESULTS:We randomly assigned 189 subjects in this study (63 subjects in each group). Both RIPC and sham RIPC procedures were well tolerated and completed with high compliance (98.41% and 95.24%, respectively). Neither plasma neuron-specific enolase levels nor S-100B levels changed significantly before and after treatment. No severe adverse event was attributed to RIPC and sham RIPC procedures. The incidence of new diffusion-weighted imaging lesions in the RIPC group (15.87%) was significantly lower than in the sham group (36.51%; relative risk, 0.44; 96% confidence interval, 0.20-0.91; P<0.01) and the control group (41.27%; relative risk, 0.39; 96% confidence interval, 0.21-0.82; P<0.01). The volumes of lesions were smaller in the RIPC group than in the control and sham groups (P<0.01 each). Ischemic events that occurred after CAS were 1 transient ischemic attack in the RIPC group, 2 strokes in the control group, and 2 strokes and 1 transient ischemic attack in the sham group, but these results were not significantly different among the 3 groups (P=0.597). CONCLUSIONS:RIPC is safe in patients undergoing CAS, which may be able to decrease ischemic brain injury secondary to CAS. However, the mechanisms and effects of RIPC on clinical outcomes in this cohort of patients need further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION:URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01654666.

Dataset Information

Adrenal artery ablation for primary aldosteronism without apparent aldosteronoma: An efficacy and safety, proof-of-principle trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets