Nanoparticle formulation of mycophenolate mofetil achieves enhanced efficacy against hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting tumour-associated fibroblast.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yang Z
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8034467 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Immunosuppressive (IS) therapy is indicated to treat progressive sarcoidosis, but randomized controlled trials to guide physicians in the use of steroid sparing agents are lacking. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the role of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as an alternative therapy in the treatment of sarcoidosis.A retrospective chart review of all patients who had been prescribed MMF between January 2008 and October 2011 was conducted. Patients with insufficient data or who had another IS therapy initiated concomitantly with MMF, including prednisone, were excluded. Physiological data obtained at the time MMF therapy was initiated as well as six and twelve months before and after therapy was extracted. Longitudinal analyses of the effect of MMF on changes in pulmonary function at MMF start, 6 months, 12 months pre and post MMF therapy were conducted.37/76 patients met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant changes in PFT measurements pre and post MMF therapy. We did find a trend (p = 0.07) towards improvement in DLCO 12 months pre and post MMF in patients who were started on MMF due to intolerance to previous IS therapy compared to those who were unresponsive to their previous IS therapy. We also noted a reduction in prednisone dose in those treated with MMF.MMF appears to offer no extra benefit to sarcoidosis patients unresponsive to previous steroid-sparing agents, but may be beneficial in patients intolerant to their previous steroid-sparing agent. Additional studies investigating the efficacy of MMF as the initial steroid-sparing agent are needed to further clarify the role of MMF in sarcoidosis.
| S-EPMC4254196 | biostudies-other
Project description:PurposeTo evaluate mycophenolate mofetil as a single noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive treatment for noninfectious ocular inflammatory diseases.DesignRetrospective cohort study.MethodsCharacteristics of patients with noninfectious ocular inflammation treated with mycophenolate mofetil at 4 subspecialty clinics from 1995 to 2007 were abstracted by expert reviewers in a standardized chart review of every eye at every visit. Main outcomes measured were control of inflammation, corticosteroid-sparing effects, and discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil (including the reasons for discontinuation). Survival analysis was used to estimate the incidence of outcomes, and to identify risk factors for each.ResultsAmong 236 patients (397 eyes) treated with mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy, 20.3%, 11.9%, and 39.8% had anterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, and posterior uveitis or panuveitis respectively; 14% had scleritis; 7.6% had mucous membrane pemphigoid; and 6.4% had other ocular inflammatory diseases. By Kaplan-Meier estimation, complete control of inflammation--sustained over consecutive visits spanning at least 28 days--was achieved in 53% and 73% of patients within 6 months and 1 year respectively. Systemic corticosteroid dosage was reduced to 10 mg of prednisone or less, while maintaining sustained control of inflammation, in 41% and 55% of patients in 6 months and 1 year respectively. Twelve percent of patients discontinued mycophenolate mofetil within the first year because of side effects of therapy.ConclusionsGiven sufficient time, mycophenolate mofetil was effective in managing ocular inflammation in approximately half of the treated patients. Treatment-limiting side effects were observed in 12% of patients and typically were reversible.
| S-EPMC2826576 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Only a subset of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) demonstrate improvement in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) during mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) treatment. Here we investigated the molecular and cellular effects in skin associated with MMF therapy in subjects who demonstrated or lacked clinical improvement. Methods: Clinical and skin gene expression data were obtained genome-wide from baseline and longitudinal (6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-mo) biopsies in 33 MMF-treated subjects with SSc. Clinical improvement was defined as mRSS reduction ≥ 25%. An inflammatory signature score was calculated for each patient sample using single-sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). Cell type specific changes during treatment were characterized. Results: Eleven subjects with SSc completed at least 24 months of MMF therapy and were termed ‘completers’. Two distinct gene expression patterns were observed that corresponded to MMF treatment status. Three subjects showed attenuation of the inflammatory signature by 24 months, paralleling reductions in activated dendritic cells. MMF cessation at 24 months resulted in an inflammatory signature rebound paralleling mRSS increase. Three subjects that remained on MMF showed persistent inflammatory signature reductions with decreasing or stable mRSS. The remaining six completers either did not fulfill minimum mRSS (n=5), and/or lacked a baseline inflammatory signature (n=4). Conclusions: An elevated inflammatory skin gene expression signature is associated with clinical improvement during MMF therapy. Inflammation returned upon MMF discontinuation with concomitant mRSS increase. These data summarize MMF’s molecular effects in skin and support MMF therapy for longer than 24 months in patients who demonstrate clinical response.
2017-01-01 | GSE76885 | GEO
Project description:BackgroundIgA nephropathy is the most common primary glomerular disease worldwide and also the most frequent cause of kidney failure. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is a selective immunosuppressant widely used in many autoimmune diseases. However, the benefits and risks of MMF for the treatment of IgA nephropathy remain uncertain.MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of MMF in IgA nephropathy patients, using the statistical software Review Manager 5.1.ResultsEight RCTs involving 357 patients were identified and included in this review. Overall, no statistical difference was found in the therapeutic effect of MMF treatment compared with other therapies. MMF had no significant effects on reducing proteinuria or protecting renal function. However, subgroup analysis indicated that relatively short-term therapy (<18 months) might be beneficial in IgA nephropathy patients while longer term MMF use conferred no advantage. There was also no statistical difference between MMF and control groups in the incidence of side effects. When compared with other immunosuppressants, MMF was considered superior to cyclophosphamide in terms of better therapeutic effects and fewer adverse reactions, but no difference was found between MMF and leflunomide.ConclusionsOur current evidence indicates that a relatively short course of MMF may be beneficial in treating IgA nephropathy. However, high-quality RCTs with large sample size as well as a well-designed study to evaluate the long-term effects of MMF are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMF in this disease.
| S-EPMC4267433 | biostudies-literature
Project description:To evaluate effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy in paediatric autoimmune uveitis.We reviewed medical records of patients, 18 years of age or younger, with autoimmune uveitis treated with MMF at our practice from 2005 to 2009. The dose and duration of MMF therapy, inflammation status, visual acuity, previous immunomodulatory therapies, and adverse effects were recorded. In addition, the following subgroups were defined: (1) Durable Disease Control: patients whose uveitis remained quiescent for at least 2 years on MMF monotherapy, with no more than two flare-ups successfully treated with an increase in MMF dosage and/or a short course (<1 month) of corticosteroids; (2) Short-term Inflammation Control: patients whose uveitis remained quiescent for less than 2 years, with no more than one flare-up successfully treated with an increase in MMF dosage and/or a short course of corticosteroids, or who initially achieved inflammation control but discontinued MMF because of significant adverse effects.A total of 38 out of 52 patients (73.1%) obtained inflammation control following 2 months of MMF monotherapy, achieving ≤ 0.5+ grading in anterior chamber cell/flare and vitreous haze. In the cross-sectional analysis, 25 patients (48.1%) met the criteria for Durable Disease Control, and 13 others (25.0%) qualified for Short-term Inflammation Control. Visual acuity remained stable or improved in 94.2% of the study population. Six patients (11.5%) discontinued MMF because of significant adverse effects, the most common of which was gastrointestinal disturbances.MMF monotherapy appears to be an effective and safe treatment in paediatric autoimmune uveitis.
| S-EPMC3171236 | biostudies-other
Project description:The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in treating Takayasu arteritis (TA) patients. Embase, Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Clinicaltrials. Gov and three Chinese literature databases (VIP, CNKI, WanFang) were searched; randomized-controlled trials and observational studies that compared the efficacy before and after treatment with MMF were included. The efficacy outcomes were disease activity, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) values and steroid dosage. The results were expressed as mean differences with 95% confidence intervals. Compared with the baseline, there were significant reductions in the ESR (-14.92 [25.35, -4.48]), CRP values (-12.99 [-23.29, -2.68]) and the steroid dosage (-17.64 [-24.89, -10.4]) after the addition of MMF, and the disease tended to stabilize. Therefore, MMF might be an alternative immunosuppressive drug for TA for the control of disease activity and to taper the steroid dosage.
| S-EPMC5486790 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThere are no high-quality data to guide long-term mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosing in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) to balance the long-term risks of allograft rejection with that of infections and malignancy. At our center, KTRs are managed with either a "preemptive" dose reduction strategy, where the MMF dose is reduced after the first year before the development of adverse events, or with a "reactive" dosing strategy, where they are maintained on the same MMF dose and only reduced if they develop an adverse event. We hypothesized that a preemptive MMF dosing strategy after the first year of transplantation is associated with decreased infections without increasing alloimmune complications.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all KTRs receiving MMF from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020. The primary outcome was the incidence of infections requiring hospitalization.ResultsOne hundred forty-two KTRs met the inclusion criteria, of whom 44 (31%) were in the preemptive group and 98 (69%) were in the reactive group. The median follow-up was 4 y (interquartile range, 3.8-4.0). Multivariable analysis showed that a preemptive MMF dose reduction strategy was associated with a lower risk of infections requiring hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.92). There was no difference in graft loss, rejection, or estimated glomerular filtration rate slope.ConclusionsPreemptive MMF dose reduction in KTRs may be an effective strategy to prevent infections without increasing the risk of allograft rejection. Randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings.
| S-EPMC11365660 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo investigate safety and efficacy of MMF in patients with severe or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma.MethodsConsecutive juvenile localized scleroderma patients undergoing systemic treatment were included in a retrospective longitudinal study. Patients treated with MMF because they were refractory or intolerant to MTX (MMF-group) were compared with responders to MTX (MTX-group). Disease activity was assessed by Localized Scleroderma Cutaneous Assessment Tool and thermography. Disease course was established on the number of relapses and treatment changes. Relapse-free survival was examined by Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsMMF and MTX groups included 22 and 47 patients, respectively. No significant difference in demographics, follow-up duration and treatment before diagnosis was observed between groups. The most represented clinical subtypes in the MMF-group were pansclerotic morphea and mixed subtype (P = 0.008 and P = 0.029, respectively), and linear scleroderma of the face in the MTX-group (P = 0.048). MMF was started because of MTX resistance (18 patients), relapse during MTX tapering/withdrawal (3 patients) and anaphylaxis to MTX (1 patient). After mean 9.4 years of follow-up, 90.9% of patients on MMF and 100% of those on MTX had inactive disease. No significant difference in relapse-free survival between the groups was found (P = 0.066, log-rank test), although MMF likely induced more persistent remission. MMF was well tolerated and combination of MMF and MTX did not increase its efficacy.ConclusionThe present study adds strong evidence on the efficacy and tolerance of MMF in severe and/or MTX-refractory juvenile localized scleroderma. Further controlled studies are needed to prove its efficacy as first line treatment.
| S-EPMC7937018 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeThe present study compared the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with that of azathioprine (AZA) in Korean patients with microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) and granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA).Materials and methodsThe medical records of 69 patients with MPA and GPA who received cyclophosphamide and subsequently received AZA or MMF for remission maintenance therapy were reviewed. All-cause mortality, relapse, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), cerebrovascular accident, and cardiovascular disease were evaluated as poor outcomes. Having a lower Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) was defined as the lowest tertile of BVAS (BVAS ≤11 in this study).ResultsIn comparative analysis of the occurrence of poor outcomes among patients taking AZA only, MMF only, and MMF after AZA, patients taking MMF only exhibited a significantly lower cumulative ESRD-free survival rate than patients taking AZA only (p=0.028). In terms of ESRD occurrence between the groups based on BVAS at diagnosis, among patients with MPA and GPA with higher BVAS at diagnosis, patients taking MMF only exhibited a significantly lower cumulative ESRD-free survival rate than those taking AZA only (p=0.047). Among patients with MPA and GPA with the lowest tertile of BVAS at diagnosis, cumulative ESRD-free survival rates did not differ.ConclusionWith regard to ESRD occurrence, the efficacy of MMF in remission maintenance therapy was less effective than AZA in patients with MPA and GPA. However, among patients with lower BVAS, there was no difference in the occurrence of poor outcomes between patients taking MMF and those taking AZA.
| S-EPMC8149928 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo describe the effects of the anti-tumor necrosis factor neutralizing antibody, infliximab, and the antiproliferative immunosuppressant, mycophenolate mofetil, in refractory neurosarcoidosis.MethodsWe treated patients with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis and CNS involvement, who had failed treatment with steroids, with infliximab (5 mg/kg on weeks 0, 2, and 6, and then every 6-8 weeks thereafter). Six out of seven patients were co-treated with mycophenolate mofetil (1,000 mg PO BID). Patients underwent a review of symptoms and complete neurologic examination every 3 months and MRI scanning before and after 3-4 infusions of infliximab.ResultsAll patients reported significant symptomatic improvement by the fourth infusion of infliximab, including relief of headache and neuropathic pain, reversal of motor, sensory, or coordination deficits, and control of seizure activity. Furthermore, infliximab therapy was universally associated with a decrease in lesion size or suppression of gadolinium enhancement as documented by MRI. A positive treatment response was attained irrespective of location or distribution of CNS involvement by sarcoidosis (dural/leptomeningeal based vs intraparenchymal; cord vs brain; single lesion vs multifocal). There were no serious adverse effects in a follow-up period spanning 6-18 months.ConclusionsCombination treatment with mycophenolate mofetil and infliximab is a promising therapeutic approach for neurosarcoidosis.
| S-EPMC2677503 | biostudies-literature