Predicting the risk of drug-drug interactions in psychiatric hospitals: a retrospective longitudinal pharmacovigilance study.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objectives
The aim was to use routine data available at a patient's admission to the hospital to predict polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions (DDI) and to evaluate the prediction performance with regard to its usefulness to support the efficient management of benefits and risks of drug prescriptions.Design
Retrospective, longitudinal study.Setting
We used data from a large multicentred pharmacovigilance project carried out in eight psychiatric hospitals in Hesse, Germany.Participants
Inpatient episodes consecutively discharged between 1 October 2017 and 30 September 2018 (year 1) or 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019 (year 2).Outcome measures
The proportion of rightly classified hospital episodes.Methods
We used gradient boosting to predict respective outcomes. We tested the performance of our final models in unseen patients from another calendar year and separated the study sites used for training from the study sites used for performance testing.Results
A total of 53 909 episodes were included in the study. The models' performance, as measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic, was 'excellent' (0.83) and 'acceptable' (0.72) compared with common benchmarks for the prediction of polypharmacy and DDI, respectively. Both models were substantially better than a naive prediction based solely on basic diagnostic grouping.Conclusion
This study has shown that polypharmacy and DDI can be predicted from routine data at patient admission. These predictions could support an efficient management of benefits and risks of hospital prescriptions, for instance by including pharmaceutical supervision early after admission for patients at risk before pharmacological treatment is established.
SUBMITTER: Wolff J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8043005 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Computational methods for predicting drug-target interactions have become important in drug research because they can help to reduce the time, cost, and failure rates for developing new drugs. Recently, with the accumulation of drug-related data sets related to drug side effects and pharmacological data, it has became possible to predict potential drug-target interactions. In this study, we focus on drug-drug interactions (DDI), their adverse effects ([Formula: see text]) and pharmacological information ([Formula: see text]), and investigate the relationship among chemical structures, side effects, and DDIs from several data sources. In this study, [Formula: see text] data from the STITCH database, [Formula: see text] from drugs.com, and drug-target pairs from ChEMBL and SIDER were first collected. Then, by applying two machine learning approaches, a support vector machine (SVM) and a kernel-based L1-norm regularized logistic regression (KL1LR), we showed that DDI is a promising feature in predicting drug-target interactions. Next, the accuracies of predicting drug-target interactions using DDI were compared to those obtained using the chemical structure and side effects based on the SVM and KL1LR approaches, showing that DDI was the data source contributing the most for predicting drug-target interactions.
| S-EPMC3836969 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Genetics provides two major opportunities for understanding human disease-as a transformative line of etiological inquiry and as a biomarker for heritable diseases. In psychiatry, biomarkers are very much needed for both research and treatment, given the heterogenous populations identified by current phenomenologically based diagnostic systems. To date, however, useful and valid biomarkers have been scant owing to the inaccessibility and complexity of human brain tissue and consequent lack of insight into disease mechanisms. Genetic biomarkers are therefore especially promising for psychiatric disorders. Genome-wide association studies of common diseases have matured over the last decade, generating the knowledge base for increasingly informative individual-level genetic risk prediction. In this review, we discuss fundamental concepts involved in computing genetic risk with current methods, strengths and weaknesses of various approaches, assessments of utility, and applications to various psychiatric disorders and related traits. Although genetic risk prediction has become increasingly straightforward to apply and common in published studies, there are important pitfalls to avoid. At present, the clinical utility of genetic risk prediction is still low; however, there is significant promise for future clinical applications as the ancestral diversity and sample sizes of genome-wide association studies increase. We discuss emerging data and methods aimed at improving the value of genetic risk prediction for disentangling disease mechanisms and stratifying subjects for epidemiological and clinical studies. For all applications, it is absolutely critical that polygenic risk prediction is applied with appropriate methodology and control for confounding to avoid repeating some mistakes of the candidate gene era.
| S-EPMC6599546 | biostudies-literature
Project description:RationaleIn psychiatric drug discovery, a critical step is predicting the psychopharmacological effect and therapeutic potential of novel (or repurposed) compounds early in the development process. This process is hampered by the need to utilize multiple disorder-specific and labor-intensive behavioral assays.ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the feasibility of a single high-throughput behavioral assay to classify psychiatric drugs into multiple psychopharmacological classes.MethodsUsing Pattern Array, a procedure for data mining exploratory behavior in mice, we mined ~100,000 complex movement patterns for those that best predict psychopharmacological class and dose. The best patterns were integrated into a classification model that assigns psychopharmacological compounds to one of six clinically relevant classes--antipsychotic, antidepressant, opioids, psychotomimetic, psychomotor stimulant, and α-adrenergic.ResultsSurprisingly, only a small number of well-chosen behaviors were required for successful class prediction. One of them, a behavior termed "universal drug detector", was dose-dependently decreased by drugs from all classes, thus providing a sensitive index of psychopharmacological activity. In independent validation in a blind fashion, simulating the process of in vivo pre-clinical drug screening, the classification model correctly classified nine out of 11 "unknown" compounds. Interestingly, even "misclassifications" match known alternate therapeutic indications, illustrating drug "repurposing" potential.ConclusionsUnlike standard animal models, the discovered classification model can be systematically updated to improve its predictive power and add therapeutic classes and subclasses with each additional diversification of the database. Our study demonstrates the power of data mining approaches for behavior analysis, using multiple measures in parallel for drug screening and behavioral phenotyping.
| S-EPMC8056474 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction: Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) produce unparalleled efficacy in refractory neoplasms but can also lead to serious toxicities. Although ADC-related sepsis has been reported, the clinical features are not well characterized in real-world studies. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the association between ADCs and sepsis using FAERS data and uncover the clinical characteristics of ADC-related sepsis. Methods: We performed disproportionality analysis using FAERS data and compared rates of sepsis in cancer patients receiving ADCs vs. other regimens. Associations between ADCs and sepsis were assessed using reporting odds ratios (RORs) and information component (IC). For each treatment group, we detected drug interaction signals, and conducted subgroup analyses (age, gender, and regimens) and sensitivity analyses. Results: A total of 24,618 cases were reported with ADCs between Q1, 2004 and Q3, 2021. Sepsis, septic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, and other sepsis-related toxicities were significantly associated with ADCs than other drugs in this database. Sepsis and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome have the highest safety concerns with ADCs compared with other anticancer monotherapies. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin and inotuzumab ozogamicin showed increased safety risks than other ADCs. For the top nine ADC-related sepsis, males showed higher sepsis safety concern than females (p <0.001); however, age did not exert influence on the risk of sepsis. We identified that 973 of 2,441 (39.9%) cases had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 766 of 2613 (29.3%) cases on ADCs died during therapy. Time-to-onset analysis indicated ADC-related sepsis is prone to occur within a month after administration. Co-administration of ADCs with colony-stimulating factors, proton pump inhibitors, H2-receptor antagonists, or CYP3A4/5 inhibitors showed to synergistically increase the risk of sepsis-related toxicities. Conclusion: Antibody-drug conjugates may increase the risk of sepsis in cancer patients, leading to high mortality. Further studies are warranted to characterize the underlying mechanisms and design preventive measures for ADC-related sepsis.
| S-EPMC9710632 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Importance: Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a rare but serious adverse event that may impact treatment decisions. However, there is limited information comparing CIP risks between immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and combination with chemotherapy due to a lack of direct cross-comparison in clinical trials. Objective: To determine whether ICI combination with chemotherapy is superior to ICI in other drug regimens (including monotherapy) in terms of CIP risk. Study Design and Methods: This observational, cross-sectional and worldwide pharmacovigilance cohort study included patients who developed CIP from the World Health Organization database (WHO) VigiBase and the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Individual case safety reports (ICSR) were extracted from 2015 to 2020 in FAERS and from 1967 to 2020 in VigiBase. Timing and reporting odds ratio (ROR) of CIP in different treatment strategies were used to detect time-to-onset and the risk of pneumonitis after different immunotherapy regimens. Results: A total of 93,623 and 114,704 ICI-associated ICSRs were included in this study from VigiBase and FAERS databases respectively. 3450 (3.69%) and 3278 (2.86%) CIPs occurred after therapy initiation with a median of 62 days (VigiBase) and 40 days (FAERS). Among all the CIPs, 274 (7.9%) and 537 (16.4%) CIPs were associated with combination therapies. ICIs plus chemotherapy combination was associated with pneumonitis in both VigiBase [ROR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18-1.52] and FAERS [ROR 1.39, 95% CI 1.27-1.53]. The combination of anti-PD-1 antibodies and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies with chemotherapy demonstrated an association with pneumonitis in both VigiBase [PD-1+chemotherapy: 1.76, 95% CI 1.52-2.05; CTLA-4+chemotherapy: 2.36, 95% CI 1.67-3.35] and FAERS [PD-1+chemotherapy: 1.70, 95% CI 1.52-1.91; CTLA-4+chemotherapy: 1.70, 95% CI 1.31-2.20]. Anti-PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy combinations did not show the association. Conclusion: Compared to ICI in other drug regimens (including monotherapy), the combination of ICI plus chemotherapy is significantly associated with higher pneumonitis toxicity. Anti-PD-1/CTLA4 medications in combination with chemotherapy should be obviated in patients with potential risk factors for CIP. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, ChiCTR2200059067.
| S-EPMC10133569 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo characterize the post-marketing reporting of serotonin syndrome (SS) due to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with linezolid and investigate the relationship with pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties of serotonergic agents.MethodsWe queried the worldwide FDA Adverse Event Reporting System to extract SS records due to DDIs where linezolid was reported as suspect. For each serotonergic agent concomitantly reported, proportion of SS reports and mean number of DDIs were calculated and three different "SS reporting zones" were created. Relevant PK (peak concentration, area under plasma concentration curve, volume of distribution (VD), and lipophilicity) and PD (values of binding affinity (Ki) and IC50 for serotonin reuptake transporter (SERT) and 5-HT2A) parameters were extracted for each serotonergic agent, and relevant PK/PD indexes were calculated to assess correlation with mean number of DDIs (PV index).ResultsSix hundred sixty-nine reports of SS mentioning linezolid were found, being linezolid-citalopram (N = 69; 10.3%) the most frequently DDI reported. Citalopram and methadone showed respectively the highest proportion of SS reports (0.28%) and the lowest mean number of DDIs (1.41). Citalopram, escitalopram, and methadone emerged as red (i.e., alert)-zone medications: they exhibited high lipophilicity and large VD (proxies of excellent central nervous system penetration) coupled with high potency. Among PK/PD indexes, a significant correlation with PV index was found for VD/Ki SERT ratio (p = 0.05).DiscussionOur integrated approach suggests that linezolid is more likely to cause SS when co-administered with citalopram, escitalopram, and methadone, as inferred from their pharmacological properties. Proper management of SS should be tailored on a case-by-case basis.
| S-EPMC7803711 | biostudies-literature
Project description:INTRODUCTION:Adverse drug reactions related to drug-drug interactions cause harm to patients. There is a body of research on signal detection for drug interactions in collections of individual case reports, but limited use in regular pharmacovigilance. OBJECTIVE:The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of signal detection of drug-drug interactions in collections of individual case reports of suspected adverse drug reactions. METHODS:This study was conducted in VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports. The data lock point was 31 August 2016, which provided 13.6 million reports for analysis after deduplication. Statistical signal detection was performed using a previously developed predictive model for possible drug interactions. The model accounts for an interaction disproportionality measure, expressed suspicion of an interaction by the reporter, potential for interaction through cytochrome P450 activity of drugs, and reported information indicative of unexpected therapeutic response or altered therapeutic effect. Triage filters focused the preliminary signal assessment on combinations relating to serious adverse events with case series of no more than 30 reports from at least two countries, with at least one report during the previous 2 years. Additional filters sought to eliminate already known drug interactions through text mining of standard literature sources. Preliminary signal assessment was performed by a multidisciplinary group of pharmacovigilance professionals from Uppsala Monitoring Centre and collaborating organizations, whereas in-depth signal assessment was performed by experienced pharmacovigilance assessors. RESULTS:We performed preliminary signal assessment for 407 unique drug pairs. Of these, 157 drug pairs were considered already known to interact, whereas 232 were closed after preliminary assessment for other reasons. Ten drug pairs were subjected to in-depth signal assessment and an additional eight were decided to be kept under review awaiting additional reports. The triage filters had a major impact in focusing our preliminary signal assessment on just 14% of the statistical signals generated by the predictive model for drug interactions. In-depth assessment led to three signals communicated with the broader pharmacovigilance community, six closed signals and one to be kept under review. CONCLUSION:This study shows that signals of adverse drug interactions can be detected through broad statistical screening of individual case reports. It further shows that signal assessment related to possible drug interactions requires more detailed information on the temporal relationship between different drugs and the adverse event. Future research may consider whether interaction signal detection should be performed not for individual adverse event terms but for pairs of drugs across a spectrum of adverse events.
| S-EPMC7395907 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Identification of Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs) is a significant challenge during drug development and clinical practice. DDIs are responsible for many adverse drug effects (ADEs), decreasing patient quality of life and causing higher care expenses. DDIs are not systematically evaluated in pre-clinical or clinical trials and so the FDA U. S. Food and Drug Administration relies on post-marketing surveillance to monitor patient safety. However, existing pharmacovigilance algorithms show poor performance for detecting DDIs exhibiting prohibitively high false positive rates. Alternatively, methods based on chemical structure and pharmacological similarity have shown promise in adverse drug event detection. We hypothesize that the use of chemical biology data in a post hoc analysis of pharmacovigilance results will significantly improve the detection of dangerous interactions. Our model integrates a reference standard of DDIs known to cause arrhythmias with drug similarity data. To compare similarity between drugs we used chemical structure (both 2D and 3D molecular structure), adverse drug side effects, chemogenomic targets, drug indication classes, and known drug-drug interactions. We evaluated the method on external reference standards. Our results showed an enhancement of sensitivity, specificity and precision in different top positions with the use of similarity measures to rank the candidates extracted from pharmacovigilance data. For the top 100 DDI candidates, similarity-based modeling yielded close to twofold precision enhancement compared to the proportional reporting ratio (PRR). Moreover, the method helps in the DDI decision making through the identification of the DDI in the reference standard that generated the candidate.
| S-EPMC4466327 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundMogamulizumab (Moga) is a C-C chemokine receptor-4 antibody approved in the United States for relapsed /refractory mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome. Few cases reported an increased risk of hepatitis B reactivation and cytomegalovirus (CMV) related infection post-Moga. However, literature is limited to mainly case reports and series, while no study has used the Food and Drug Administration adverse events reporting system (FARES) database to investigate the relationship.MethodsUsing United States Food and Drug Administration adverse events reporting system database, we collected all cases of hepatitis B reactivation and CMV related infection between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2019, for Moga and other drugs. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated, which was considered significant when the lower limit of 95% confidence interval (CI) >1.FindingsThree hundred and thirty-eight total adverse cases were reported for Moga during the study period, with 261 cases reported indication for use, including cutaneous T cell lymphoma (47.04%), and adult T cell leukemia/lymphoma (30.18%). Eight cases were reported for hepatitis B reactivation with Moga use, compared to 2290 cases with other medications. The ROR is 143.67 (p<0.001, 95% CI, 71.17-290.04). CMV related infection was noted in 17 cases using Moga, while 12,849 cases with others. The ROR is 55.89 (p<0.001, 95% CI, 34.31-91.06). In the Moga group, five deaths occurred in hepatitis B reactivation patients and nine deaths with CMV cases.InterpretationA signal has been identified between Moga exposure and hepatitis B reactivation as well as CMV related infection. A consideration in future studies should be placed on determining the relationship and investigating the need for pre-treatment screening, close monitoring, and utilization of prophylaxis in this population-based on pre-treatment risks.FundingNone.
| S-EPMC7700953 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Understanding drug-drug interactions is an essential step to reduce the risk of adverse drug events before clinical drug co-prescription. Existing methods, commonly integrating heterogeneous data to increase model performance, often suffer from a high model complexity, As such, how to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying drug-drug interactions while preserving rational biological interpretability is a challenging task in computational modeling for drug discovery. In this study, we attempt to investigate drug-drug interactions via the associations between genes that two drugs target. For this purpose, we propose a simple f drug target profile representation to depict drugs and drug pairs, from which an l2-regularized logistic regression model is built to predict drug-drug interactions. Furthermore, we define several statistical metrics in the context of human protein-protein interaction networks and signaling pathways to measure the interaction intensity, interaction efficacy and action range between two drugs. Large-scale empirical studies including both cross validation and independent test show that the proposed drug target profiles-based machine learning framework outperforms existing data integration-based methods. The proposed statistical metrics show that two drugs easily interact in the cases that they target common genes; or their target genes connect via short paths in protein-protein interaction networks; or their target genes are located at signaling pathways that have cross-talks. The unravelled mechanisms could provide biological insights into potential adverse drug reactions of co-prescribed drugs.
| S-EPMC8413337 | biostudies-literature