Dataset Information

Predicting Polygenic Risk of Psychiatric Disorders.

ABSTRACT: Genetics provides two major opportunities for understanding human disease-as a transformative line of etiological inquiry and as a biomarker for heritable diseases. In psychiatry, biomarkers are very much needed for both research and treatment, given the heterogenous populations identified by current phenomenologically based diagnostic systems. To date, however, useful and valid biomarkers have been scant owing to the inaccessibility and complexity of human brain tissue and consequent lack of insight into disease mechanisms. Genetic biomarkers are therefore especially promising for psychiatric disorders. Genome-wide association studies of common diseases have matured over the last decade, generating the knowledge base for increasingly informative individual-level genetic risk prediction. In this review, we discuss fundamental concepts involved in computing genetic risk with current methods, strengths and weaknesses of various approaches, assessments of utility, and applications to various psychiatric disorders and related traits. Although genetic risk prediction has become increasingly straightforward to apply and common in published studies, there are important pitfalls to avoid. At present, the clinical utility of genetic risk prediction is still low; however, there is significant promise for future clinical applications as the ancestral diversity and sample sizes of genome-wide association studies increase. We discuss emerging data and methods aimed at improving the value of genetic risk prediction for disentangling disease mechanisms and stratifying subjects for epidemiological and clinical studies. For all applications, it is absolutely critical that polygenic risk prediction is applied with appropriate methodology and control for confounding to avoid repeating some mistakes of the candidate gene era.

SUBMITTER: Martin AR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6599546 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Predicting Polygenic Risk of Psychiatric Disorders.

Martin Alicia R AR Daly Mark J MJ Robinson Elise B EB Hyman Steven E SE Neale Benjamin M BM

Biological psychiatry 20181228 2

Genetics provides two major opportunities for understanding human disease-as a transformative line of etiological inquiry and as a biomarker for heritable diseases. In psychiatry, biomarkers are very much needed for both research and treatment, given the heterogenous populations identified by current phenomenologically based diagnostic systems. To date, however, useful and valid biomarkers have been scant owing to the inaccessibility and complexity of human brain tissue and consequent lack of in ...[more]

PMID: 30737014

Similar Datasets

Project description:Many psychiatric disorders are associated with impaired executive functioning (EF). The associated EF component varies by psychiatric disorders, and this variation might be due to genetic liability. We explored the genetic association between five psychiatric disorders and EF in clinically-recruited attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) children using polygenic risk score (PRS) methodology. Genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data for ADHD, major depressive disorder (MDD), schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BIP) and autism were used to calculate the PRSs. EF was evaluated by the Stroop test for inhibitory control, the trail-making test for cognitive flexibility, and the digital span test for working memory in a Chinese ADHD cohort (n?=?1147). Exploratory factor analysis of the three measures identified one principal component for EF (EF-PC). Linear regression models were used to analyze the association between each PRS and the EF measures. The role of EF measures in mediating the effects of the PRSs on ADHD symptoms was also analyzed. The result showed the PRSs for MDD, ADHD and BIP were all significantly associated with the EF-PC. For each EF component, the association results were different for the PRSs of the five psychiatric disorders: the PRSs for ADHD and MDD were associated with inhibitory control (adjusted P?=?0.0183 and 0.0313, respectively), the PRS for BIP was associated with working memory (adjusted P?=?0.0416), and the PRS for SZ was associated with cognitive flexibility (adjusted P?=?0.0335). All three EF measures were significantly correlated with ADHD symptoms. In mediation analyses, the ADHD and MDD PRSs, which were associated with inhibitory control, had significant indirect effects on ADHD symptoms through the mediation of inhibitory control. These findings indicate that the polygenic risks for several psychiatric disorders influence specific executive dysfunction in children with ADHD. The results helped to clarify the relationship between risk genes of each mental disorder and the intermediate cognitive domain, which may further help elucidate the risk genes and motivate efforts to develop EF measures as a diagnostic marker and future treatment target.

Project description:Over the past decade, large-scale genetic studies have successfully identified hundreds of genetic variants robustly associated with risk for psychiatric disorders. However, mechanistic insight and clinical translation continue to lag the pace of risk variant identification, hindered by the sheer number of targets and their predominant noncoding localization, as well as pervasive pleiotropy and incomplete penetrance. Successful next steps require identification of "causal" genetic variants and their proximal biological consequences; placing variants within biologically defined functional contexts, reflecting specific molecular pathways, cell types, circuits, and developmental windows; and characterizing the downstream, convergent neurobiological impact of polygenicity within an individual. Here, we discuss opportunities and challenges of high-throughput transcriptomic profiling in the human brain, and how transcriptomic approaches can help pinpoint mechanisms underlying genetic risk for psychiatric disorders at a scale necessary to tackle daunting levels of polygenicity. These include transcriptome-wide association studies for risk gene prioritization through integration of genome-wide association studies with expression quantitative trait loci. We outline transcriptomic results that inform our understanding of the brain-level molecular pathology of psychiatric disorders, including autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. Finally, we discuss systems-level approaches for integration of distinct genetic, genomic, and phenotypic levels, including combining spatially resolved gene expression and human neuroimaging maps. Results highlight the importance of understanding gene expression (dys)regulation across human brain development as a major contributor to psychiatric disease pathogenesis, from common variants acting as expression quantitative trait loci to rare variants enriched for gene expression regulatory pathways.

Project description:OBJECTIVE:More than 90% of people who attempt suicide have a psychiatric diagnosis; however, twin and family studies suggest that the genetic etiology of suicide attempt is partially distinct from that of the psychiatric disorders themselves. The authors present the largest genome-wide association study (GWAS) on suicide attempt, using cohorts of individuals with major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia from the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium. METHODS:The samples comprised 1,622 suicide attempters and 8,786 nonattempters with major depressive disorder; 3,264 attempters and 5,500 nonattempters with bipolar disorder; and 1,683 attempters and 2,946 nonattempters with schizophrenia. A GWAS on suicide attempt was performed by comparing attempters to nonattempters with each disorder, followed by a meta-analysis across disorders. Polygenic risk scoring was used to investigate the genetic relationship between suicide attempt and the psychiatric disorders. RESULTS:Three genome-wide significant loci for suicide attempt were found: one associated with suicide attempt in major depressive disorder, one associated with suicide attempt in bipolar disorder, and one in the meta-analysis of suicide attempt in mood disorders. These associations were not replicated in independent mood disorder cohorts from the UK Biobank and iPSYCH. No significant associations were found in the meta-analysis of all three disorders. Polygenic risk scores for major depression were significantly associated with suicide attempt in major depressive disorder (R2=0.25%), bipolar disorder (R2=0.24%), and schizophrenia (R2=0.40%). CONCLUSIONS:This study provides new information on genetic associations and demonstrates that genetic liability for major depression increases risk for suicide attempt across psychiatric disorders. Further collaborative efforts to increase sample size may help to robustly identify genetic associations and provide biological insights into the etiology of suicide attempt.

Dataset Information

Predicting Polygenic Risk of Psychiatric Disorders.

Publications

Predicting Polygenic Risk of Psychiatric Disorders.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure