Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Gas Exchange, the Membrane Lung, and the Ventilator.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Badulak JH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8043271 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundNo data are available on the duration of time needed to assess the adequacy of lung function after stopping sweep gas for weaning of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The objective of this study was to investigate changes in arterial blood gases (ABGs) during sweep gas off trials in patients receiving venovenous ECMO.MethodsData on patients receiving venovenous ECMO, with a weaning trial at least once, were collected prospectively from January 2012 through December 2017. Serial changes in ABGs during sweep gas off trial and clinical outcomes after weaning from venovenous ECMO were evaluated.ResultsOver the study period, 192 sweep gas off trials occurred in 93 patients: 115 (60%) failed and 77 (40%) were successful. During the trial, significant changes in blood gases were observed within 1 h in all patients. When serial ABGs were compared according to trial off results, there were no significant differences in the pH, PaCO2, and HCO3- trends across time points between successful and failed trials. However, PaO2 (70.6 versus 93.4 mmHg), SaO2 (91.9 versus 95.2%), and PaO2/FiO2 ratio (164.0 versus 233.4) were significantly lower in failed trials than successful trials within 1 h after stopping sweep gas. After 2 h of trial off, no significant change in blood gases was observed until the end of the trial.ConclusionsNo change in blood gases was observed 2 h after stopping sweep gas in patients receiving venovenous ECMO. Based on our institutional experience, however, we suggest monitoring for 2 h or more after stopping sweep gas flow to assess if patients are ready for decannulation. The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.
| S-EPMC6862773 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesThe objective of the present study was to examine the effect of venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) use on the haemodynamics during single lung transplantation (SLT) and postoperative course.MethodsForty-seven patients who underwent SLT for end-stage lung diseases in our lung transplant centre between January 2010 and December 2019 were included in this study. The recipients were divided into 3 groups according to the type of intraoperative ECMO. No type of ECMO was intra-operatively used in the patients of the no use of ECMO (NO ECMO) group. The patients in the venoarterial (VA) and VV ECMO groups were put on VA and VV ECMO during the surgery, respectively. The data were compared among the 3 groups.ResultsThere were 13 SLT cases in the NO ECMO group, 23 SLT cases in the VA ECMO group and 11 SLT cases in the VV ECMO group. Re-exploration for bleeding was performed in 3 (13.0%) recipients in the VA ECMO group. No recipients required re-exploration in the other groups. In the NO ECMO group, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) was significantly elevated during the main pulmonary artery clamp on the SLT side and it was decreased in the VA ECMO group because of the bypass flow. Interestingly, systolic PAP was significantly decreased in the VV ECMO group as well.ConclusionsVV ECMO decreases the PAP during SLT, which could be a choice for extracorporeal life support during lung transplant surgery for patients, even those with pulmonary hypertension.
| S-EPMC9297505 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7919146 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8043274 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC8043269 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundVenovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being used for acute respiratory distress syndrome and as a bridge to lung transplantation. After initiation of venovenous ECMO, systemic anticoagulation therapy is traditionally administered and can cause bleeding diathesis. Here, we investigated whether venovenous ECMO can be administered without continuous systemic anticoagulation administration for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of an institutional ECMO database. We included consecutive patients from January 2015 through February 2019. Overall, 38 patients received low levels of continuous systemic anticoagulation (AC+) whereas the subsequent 36 patients received standard venous thromboprophylaxis (AC-). Published Extracorporeal Life Support Organization guidelines were used for the definition of outcomes and complications.ResultsOverall, survival was not different between the two groups (P = .58). However, patients in the AC+ group had higher rates of gastrointestinal bleeding (28.9%, vs AC- group 5.6%; P < .001). The events per patient-day of gastrointestinal bleeding was 0.00025 in the AC- group and 0.00064 in the AC+ group (P < .001). In addition, oxygenator dysfunction was increased in the AC+ group (28.9% and 0.00067 events per patient-day, vs AC- 11.1% and 0.00062 events per patient-day; P = .02). Furthermore, the AC+ group received more transfusions: packed red blood cells, AC+ group 94.7% vs AC- group 55.5% (P < .001); fresh frozen plasma, AC+ 60.5% vs AC- 16.6% (P = .001); and platelets, AC+ 84.2% vs AC- 27.7% (P < .001). There was no circuit thrombosis in either groups throughout the duration of ECMO support.ConclusionsOur results suggest that venovenous ECMO can be safely administered without continuous systemic anticoagulation therapy. This approach may be associated with reduced bleeding diathesis and need for blood transfusions.
| S-EPMC7486253 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a treatment for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Femoro-atrial cannulation means blood is drained from the inferior vena cava and returned to the superior vena cava; the opposite is termed atrio-femoral. Clinical data comparing these two methods is scarce and conflicting. Using computational fluid dynamics, we aim to compare atrio-femoral and femoro-atrial cannulation to assess the impact on recirculation fraction, under ideal conditions and several clinical scenarios. Using a patient-averaged model of the venae cavae and right atrium, commercially-available cannulae were positioned in each configuration. Additionally, occlusion of the femoro-atrial drainage cannula side-holes with/without reduced inferior vena cava inflow (0-75%) and retraction of the atrio-femoral drainage cannula were modelled. Large-eddy simulations were run for 2-6L/min circuit flow, obtaining time-averaged flow data. The model showed good agreement with clinical atrio-femoral recirculation data. Under ideal conditions, atrio-femoral yielded 13.5% higher recirculation than femoro-atrial across all circuit flow rates. Atrio-femoral right atrium flow patterns resembled normal physiology with a single large vortex. Femoro-atrial cannulation resulted in multiple vortices and increased turbulent kinetic energy at > 3L/min circuit flow. Occluding femoro-atrial drainage cannula side-holes and reducing inferior vena cava inflow increased mean recirculation by 11% and 32%, respectively. Retracting the atrio-femoral drainage cannula did not affect recirculation. These results suggest that, depending on drainage issues, either atrio-femoral or femoro-atrial cannulation may be preferrable. Rather than cannula tip proximity, the supply of available venous blood at the drainage site appears to be the strongest factor affecting recirculation.
| S-EPMC9523655 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Nosocomial infections occurring during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support have already been reported, but few studied infections directly related to ECMO devices. This study aims to evaluate the rate of both colonisations and infections related to ECMO devices at the time of ECMO removal. RESULTS:We included all consecutive adult patients treated with venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) for at least 48 h during a 34-month study. At the time of ECMO removal, blood cultures, swab cultures on insertion cannula site and intravascular cannula extremity cultures were systematically performed. Each ECMO device was classified according to the infectious status into three groups: (1) uninfected/uncolonised ECMO device, (2) ECMO device colonisation and (3) ECMO device infection. Ninety-nine patients underwent 103 VV-ECMO, representing 1472 ECMO days. The ECMO device infection rate was 9.7% (10 events), including 7 ECMO device-related bloodstream infections (6.8%). The ECMO device colonisation rate was 32% (33 events). No difference was observed between the three groups, regarding days of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality. We observed a longer ECMO duration in the ECMO device colonisation group as compared to the uninfected/uncolonised ECMO device group [12 (9-20 days) vs. 5 days (5-16 days), respectively, p < 0.05]. CONCLUSIONS:At the time of ECMO removal, systematic blood culture and intravascular extremity cannula culture may help to diagnose ECMO device-related infection. We reported a quite low infection rate related to ECMO device. Further studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of systematic strategies of cannula culture at the time of ECMO removal.
| S-EPMC5676570 | biostudies-literature
Project description:No major study has been performed on the conversion from venovenous (VV) to venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in adults. This single-center retrospective cohort study aimed to investigate the incidence, indication, and outcome in patients who converted from VV to VA ECMO. All adult patients (≥18 years) who commenced VV ECMO at our center between 2005 and 2018 were screened. Of 219 VV ECMO patients, 21% (n = 46) were converted to VA ECMO. The indications for conversion were right ventricular failure (RVF) (65%), cardiogenic shock (26%), and other (9%). In the converted patients, there was a significant increase in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores between admission 12 (9-13) and conversion 15 (13-17, p < 0.001). Compared to non-converted patients, converted patients also had a higher mortality rate (62% vs. 16%, p < 0.001) and a lower admission Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction (RESP) score (p < 0.001). Outcomes were especially unfavorable in those converted due to RVF. These results indicate that VA ECMO, as opposed to VV ECMO, should be considered as the first mode of choice in patients with respiratory failure and signs of circulatory impairment, especially in those with impaired RV function. For the remaining patients, Pre-admission RESP score, daily echocardiography, and SOFA score trajectories may help in the early identification of those where conversion from VV to VA ECMO is warranted. Multi-centric studies are warranted to validate these findings.
| S-EPMC7999389 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundA life-threatening complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) refractory to conventional management. Venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (VV-ECMO) is used to support patients with ARDS in whom conventional management fails. Scoring systems to predict mortality in VV-ECMO remain unvalidated in COVID-19 ARDS. This report describes a large single-center experience with VV-ECMO in COVID-19 and assesses the utility of standard risk calculators.MethodsA retrospective review of a prospective database of all patients with COVID-19 who underwent VV-ECMO cannulation between March 15 and June 27, 2020 at a single academic center was performed. Demographic, clinical, and ECMO characteristics were collected. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; survivor and nonsurvivor cohorts were compared by using univariate and bivariate analyses.ResultsForty patients who had COVID-19 and underwent ECMO were identified. Of the 33 patients (82.5%) in whom ECMO had been discontinued at the time of analysis, 18 patients (54.5%) survived to hospital discharge, and 15 (45.5%) died during ECMO. Nonsurvivors presented with a statistically significant higher Prediction of Survival on ECMO Therapy (PRESET)-Score (mean ± SD, 8.33 ± 0.8 vs 6.17 ± 1.8; P = .001). The PRESET score demonstrated accurate mortality prediction. All patients with a PRESET-Score of 6 or lowers survived, and a score of 7 or higher was associated with a dramatic increase in mortality.ConclusionsThese results suggest that favorable outcomes are possible in patients with COVID-19 who undergo ECMO at high-volume centers. This study demonstrated an association between the PRESET-Score and survival in patients with COVID-19 who underwent VV-ECMO. Standard risk calculators may aid in appropriate selection of patients with COVID-19 ARDS for ECMO.
| S-EPMC7825896 | biostudies-literature