Dataset Information

Prevalence of long-term mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in children with neurological conditions: a population-based study.

ABSTRACT:

Aim

To determine the prevalence of long-term mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) and concomitant mechanical ventilation in children with neurological conditions, with reported reasons behind the initiation of treatment.

Method

This was a population-based, cross-sectional study using Norwegian national registries and a questionnaire.

Results

In total, 114 of 19 264 children with a neurological condition had an MI-E device. Seventy-three of 103 eligible children (31 females, 42 males), median (min-max) age of 10 years 1 month (1y 5mo-17y 10mo), reported their MI-E treatment initiation. Overall, 76% reported airway clearance as the main reason to start long-term MI-E. A prophylactic use was mainly reported by children with neuromuscular disorders (NMDs). Prevalence and age at initiation differed by diagnosis. In spinal muscular atrophy and muscular dystrophies, MI-E use was reported in 34% and 7% of children, of whom 83% and 57% respectively received ventilator support. One-third of the MI-E users were children with central nervous system (CNS) conditions, such as cerebral palsy and degenerative disorders, and ventilator support was provided in 31%. The overall use of concomitant ventilatory support among the long-term MI-E users was 56%.

Interpretation

The prevalence of MI-E in a neuropaediatric population was 6 per 1000, with two-thirds having NMDs and one-third having conditions of the CNS. The decision to initiate MI-E in children with neurological conditions relies on clinical judgment.

What this paper adds

The prevalence and age at initiation of mechanical insufflation/exsufflation (MI-E) differed between diagnoses. MI-E was most commonly used in spinal muscular atrophy, where it generally coincided with ventilatory support. One-third of MI-E devices were given to children with central nervous system conditions, and one-third also received ventilatory support.

SUBMITTER: Hov B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8048789 | biostudies-literature | 2021 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prevalence of long-term mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in children with neurological conditions: a population-based study.

Hov Brit B Andersen Tiina T Toussaint Michel M Vollsaeter Maria M Mikalsen Ingvild B IB Indrekvam Solfrid S Hovland Vegard V

Developmental medicine and child neurology 20210103 5

<h4>Aim</h4>To determine the prevalence of long-term mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) and concomitant mechanical ventilation in children with neurological conditions, with reported reasons behind the initiation of treatment.<h4>Method</h4>This was a population-based, cross-sectional study using Norwegian national registries and a questionnaire.<h4>Results</h4>In total, 114 of 19 264 children with a neurological condition had an MI-E device. Seventy-three of 103 eligible children (31 f ...[more]

PMID: 33393110

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCritically ill patients receiving invasive ventilation are at risk of sputum retention. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is a technique used to mobilise sputum and optimise airway clearance. Recently, interest has increased in the use of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation for invasively ventilated critically ill adults, but evidence for the feasibility, safety and efficacy of this treatment is sparse. The aim of this scoping review is to map current and emerging evidence on the feasibility, safety and efficacy of MI-E for invasively ventilated adult patients with the aim of highlighting knowledge gaps and identifying areas for future research. Specific research questions aim to identify information informing indications and contraindications to the use of MI-E in the invasively ventilated adult, MI-E settings used, outcome measures reported within studies, adverse effects reported and perceived barriers and facilitators to using MI-E reported.MethodsWe will search electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL using the OVID platform, PROSPERO, The Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Two authors will independently screen citations, extract data and evaluate risk of bias using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Studies included will present original data and describe MI-E in invasively ventilated adult patients from 1990 onwards. Our exclusion criteria are studies in a paediatric population, editorial pieces or letters and animal or bench studies. Search results will be presented in a PRISMA study flow diagram. Descriptive statistics will be used to summarise quantitative data. For qualitative data relating to barriers and facilitators, we will use content analysis and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as a conceptual framework. Additional tables and relevant figures will present data addressing our research questions.DiscussionOur findings will enable us to map current and emerging evidence on the feasibility, safety and efficacy of MI-E for invasively ventilated critically ill adult patients. These data will provide description of how the technique is currently used, support healthcare professionals in their clinical decision making and highlight areas for future research in this important clinical area.Systematic review registrationOpen Science Framework submitted on 9 July 2020. https://osf.io/mpksq/ .

Project description:BACKGROUND:Catheter suctioning of respiratory secretions in intubated subjects is limited to the proximal airway and associated with traumatic lesions to the mucosa and poor tolerance. "Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation" exerts positive pressure, followed by an abrupt drop to negative pressure. Potential advantages of this technique are aspiration of distal airway secretions, avoiding trauma, and improving tolerance. METHODS:We applied insufflation of 50 cmH2O for 3 s and exsufflation of - 45 cmH2O for 4 s in patients with an endotracheal tube or tracheostomy cannula requiring secretion suctioning. Cycles of 10 to 12 insufflations-exsufflations were performed and repeated if secretions were aspirated and visible in the proximal artificial airway. Clinical and laboratory parameters were collected before and 5 and 60 min after the procedure. Subjects were followed during their ICU stay until discharge or death. RESULTS:Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation was applied 26 times to 7 male and 6 female subjects requiring suctioning. Mean age was 62.6 ± 20 years and mean Apache II score 23.3 ± 7.4 points. At each session, a median of 2 (IQR 1; 2) cycles on median day of intubation 11.5 (IQR 6.25; 25.75) were performed. Mean insufflation tidal volume was 1043.6 ± 649.9 ml. No statistically significant differences were identified between baseline and post-procedure time points. Barotrauma, desaturation, atelectasis, hemoptysis, or other airway complication and hemodynamic complications were not detected. All, except one, of the mechanical insufflation-exsufflation sessions were productive, showing secretions in the proximal artificial airway, and were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS:Our preliminary data suggest that mechanical insufflation-exsufflation may be safe and effective in patients with artificial airway. Safety and efficacy need to be confirmed in larger studies with different patient populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION:EudraCT 2017-005201-13 (EU Clinical Trials Register).

Project description:BackgroundDaily application of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) is used increasingly in patients with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) to prevent pulmonary congestion and thereby respiratory tract infections, although its beneficial effect remains uncertain. We, therefore, conducted a systematic review, registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020158278), to compile available evidence for daily MI-E use in subjects with NMDs and stable respiratory condition.MethodsWe performed a systematic comprehensive search of MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science up to December 23, 2021. We excluded articles studying the effect of MI-E in case of acute respiratory failure or infections and studies comparing different MI-E devices and settings. Studied outcomes were prevalence and severity of respiratory infections, lung function, respiratory characteristics, and patient satisfaction. We performed a meta-analysis using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model and assessed methodological quality by using the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research tool.ResultsA total of 3,374 records were screened, of which 25 were included, studying 608 subjects. One randomized controlled trial (RCT) found a trend toward reduced duration of respiratory infections compared to air stacking (AS) that was not statistically significant. Long-term effects on pulmonary function tests (PFT) results were reported in one RCT and one retrospective study, with mixed results regarding vital capacity. Most studies compared PFT results before and immediately after MI-E use. Meta-analysis showed an overall beneficial effect of MI-E on cough peak flow (CPF) compared to unassisted CPF (mean difference 91.6 L/min [95% CI 28.3-155.0], P < .001). Subject satisfaction was high, though possibly influenced by major bias.ConclusionsThere is limited evidence available to support beneficial effects of daily use of MI-E in clinically stable subjects with NMDs, with the possible exception of increased CPF immediately after MI-E application. Lack of longitudinal studies preclude conclusions regarding long-term effects. The very limited data comparing MI-E to AS preclude comparisons.

Project description:BackgroundPostoperative positive pressure lung expansion is associated with decreased pulmonary complications and improved clinical outcomes. The aim of the present study was to compare the differences in post-operative pulmonary complications and clinical outcomes between two groups of study subjects who underwent cardiac surgery; one included subjects who received mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) and the other included subjects who received intermittent positive pressure breathing (IPPB) therapy.MethodsThis retrospective study included 51 subjects, who underwent cardiac surgery in an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital during the time period from June 2017 to February 2018. After liberation from mechanical ventilation, the subjects received lung expansion therapy by means of two types of positive pressure devices, MI-E (n = 21) or IPPB (n = 30). The pulmonary complications, lung function, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.ResultsSubjects in both groups displayed similar baseline characteristics and underwent similar types of surgical procedures. Compared to subjects who received non-oscillatory therapy, those who received MI-E therapy had higher post-operative force vital capacity (58.4 ± 4.74% vs. 46.0 ± 3.70%, p = 0.042), forced expiratory volume in one second (62.4 ± 5.23% vs. 46.8 ± 3.83%, p = 0.017), and peak flow rate (67.1 ± 5.53 L vs. 55.7 ± 4.44 L p = 0.111). However, the incidence of chest pain was higher in the MI-E group (n = 13, 61.9%) than in the IPPB group (n = 4, 16.7%; odds ratio, 0.123, 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.45; p = 0.002). The length of hospital and ICU stay, development of atelectasis, pneumonia, and pleural effusion were similar in both the groups.ConclusionBoth IPPB and MI-E therapies have similar effects on preventing post-operative complications in cardiac surgery patients. However, compared to IPPB therapy, MI-E therapy was associated with better-preserved pulmonary function and higher incidence of chest pain.

Project description:BackgroundExtubation failure, defined as reintubation within 48 h, is associated with increased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay and higher mortality risk. One cause of extubation failure is secretion retention, resulting from an inability to cough effectively. Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) simulates a cough aiding secretion clearance. However, MI-E is not routinely used in the ICU for invasively ventilated patients. This study aims to determine feasibility and acceptability of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining MI-E use to promote extubation success in intubated, ventilated adults.MethodsIt is a single-centre, feasibility RCT with semi-structured interviews, economic scoping, and exploratory physiology study. The feasibility RCT (n = 50) will compare standard care to a MI-E protocol including a minimum of two MI-E sessions via the endotracheal tube prior to extubation. Post-extubation, MI-E will be delivered via facemask or mouthpiece up to two times/day for 48 h. MI-E settings will be individualised. All patients will receive standard care (no MI-E) in relation to mechanical ventilation, weaning, rehabilitation, physiotherapy techniques such as positioning, manual airway clearance techniques, manual/ventilator hyperinflation, endotracheal suctioning, and nebulisation. Clinical data collection will occur before, on completion, and 5-min post-physiotherapy sessions (intervention/control arms). Resource use will be calculated for each 24-h period. Analyses will be descriptive and address feasibility outcomes including participant recruitment and attrition, proportion of MI-E treatment sessions completed, dataset completeness, and frequency of adverse events and acceptability. Semi-structured online interviews informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA) with patients, clinicians, and family members will explore the acceptability of the MI-E intervention and study processes. Interview data will be analysed using reflexive thematic analysis based on TFA domains through first-level coding. The embedded physiology study will use electrical impedance tomography and lung ultrasound to explore lung recruitment and de-recruitment during MI-E in a subset of 5-10 patients.DiscussionThis study will examine feasibility and acceptability of a RCT protocol of MI-E to promote extubation success. Study findings will inform design modification and conduct of a future adequately powered trial. Furthermore, the study will contribute and advance the understanding of MI-E use in critically ill intubated adults.Trial registrationISRCTN 24603037; IRAS 303674.

Dataset Information

Prevalence of long-term mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in children with neurological conditions: a population-based study.

Aim

Method

Results

Interpretation

What this paper adds

Publications

Prevalence of long-term mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in children with neurological conditions: a population-based study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets