Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

8 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

The impact of adjusting for pure predictors of exposure, mediator, and outcome on the variance of natural direct and indirect effect estimators.

ABSTRACT: It is now well established that adjusting for pure predictors of the outcome, in addition to confounders, allows unbiased estimation of the total exposure effect on an outcome with generally reduced standard errors (SEs). However, no analogous results have been derived for mediation analysis. Considering the simplest linear regression setting and the ordinary least square estimator, we obtained theoretical results showing that adjusting for pure predictors of the outcome, in addition to confounders, allows unbiased estimation of the natural indirect effect (NIE) and the natural direct effect (NDE) on the difference scale with reduced SEs. Adjusting for pure predictors of the mediator increases the SE of the NDE's estimator, but may increase or decrease the variance of the NIE's estimator. Adjusting for pure predictors of the exposure increases the variance of estimators of the NIE and NDE. Simulation studies were used to confirm and extend these results to the case where the mediator or the outcome is binary. Additional simulations were conducted to explore scenarios featuring an exposure-mediator interaction as well as the relative risk and odds ratio scales for the case of binary mediator and outcome. Both a regression approach and an inverse probability weighting approach were considered in the simulation study. A real-data illustration employing data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging is provided. This analysis is concerned with the mediating effect of vitamin D in the effect of physical activity on dementia and its results are overall consistent with the theoretical and empirical findings.

SUBMITTER: Diop A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8048855 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Estimation of Natural Indirect Effects Robust to Unmeasured Confounding and Mediator Measurement Error.

Project description:The use of causal mediation analysis to evaluate the pathways by which an exposure affects an outcome is widespread in the social and biomedical sciences. Recent advances in this area have established formal conditions for identification and estimation of natural direct and indirect effects. However, these conditions typically involve stringent assumptions of no unmeasured confounding and that the mediator has been measured without error. These assumptions may fail to hold in many practical settings where mediation methods are applied. The goal of this article is two-fold. First, we formally establish that the natural indirect effect can in fact be identified in the presence of unmeasured exposure-outcome confounding provided there is no additive interaction between the mediator and unmeasured confounder(s). Second, we introduce a new estimator of the natural indirect effect that is robust to both classical measurement error of the mediator and unmeasured confounding of both exposure-outcome and mediator-outcome relations under certain no interaction assumptions. We provide formal proofs and a simulation study to illustrate our results. In addition, we apply the proposed methodology to data from the Harvard President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program in Nigeria.

| S-EPMC8672797 | biostudies-literature

Asymptotic Variance of Linking Coefficient Estimators for Polytomous IRT Models.

Project description:In item response theory (IRT), when two groups from different populations take two separate tests, there is a need to link the two ability scales so that the item parameters of the tests are comparable across the groups. To link the two scales, information from common items are utilized to estimate linking coefficients which place the item parameters on the same scale. For polytomous IRT models, the Haebara and Stocking-Lord methods for estimating the linking coefficients have commonly been recommended. However, estimates of the variance for these methods are not available in the literature. In this article, the asymptotic variance of linking coefficients for polytomous IRT models with the Haebara and Stocking-Lord methods are derived. The results are presented in a general form and specific results are given for the generalized partial credit model. Simulations which investigate the accuracy of the derivations under various settings of model complexity and sample size are provided, showing that the derivations are accurate under the conditions considered and that the Haebara and Stocking-Lord methods have superior performance to several moment methods with performance close to that of concurrent calibration.

| S-EPMC5985705 | biostudies-literature

The use of traditional and causal estimators for mediation models with a binary outcome and exposure-mediator interaction.

Project description:An important recent development in mediation analysis is the use of causal mediation analysis. Causal mediation analysis decomposes the total exposure effect into causal direct and indirect effects in the presence of exposure-mediator interaction. However, in practice, traditional mediation analysis is still most widely used. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate the similarities and differences between the causal and traditional estimators for mediation models with a continuous mediator, a binary outcome, and exposure-mediator interaction. A real-life data example, analytical comparisons, and a simulation study were used to demonstrate the similarities and differences between the traditional and causal estimators. The causal and traditional estimators provide similar indirect effect estimates, but different direct and total effect estimates. Traditional mediation analysis may only be used when conditional direct effect estimates are of interest. Causal mediation analysis is the generally preferred method as its casual effect estimates help unravel causal mechanisms.

| S-EPMC8259448 | biostudies-literature

The estimation of direct and indirect causal effects in the presence of misclassified binary mediator.

Project description:Mediation analysis serves to quantify the effect of an exposure on an outcome mediated by a certain intermediate and to quantify the extent to which the effect is direct. When the mediator is misclassified, the validity of mediation analysis can be severely undermined. The contribution of the present work is to study the effects of non-differential misclassification of a binary mediator in the estimation of direct and indirect causal effects when the outcome is either continuous or binary and exposure-mediator interaction can be present, and to allow the correction of misclassification. A hybrid of likelihood-based and predictive value weighting method for misclassification correction coupled with sensitivity analysis is proposed and a second approach using the expectation-maximization algorithm is developed. The correction strategy requires knowledge of a plausible range of sensitivity and specificity parameters. The approaches are applied to a perinatal epidemiological study of the determinants of pre-term birth.

| S-EPMC4059465 | biostudies-literature

Comparison of variance estimators for meta-analysis of instrumental variable estimates.

Project description:BackgroundMendelian randomization studies perform instrumental variable (IV) analysis using genetic IVs. Results of individual Mendelian randomization studies can be pooled through meta-analysis. We explored how different variance estimators influence the meta-analysed IV estimate.MethodsTwo versions of the delta method (IV before or after pooling), four bootstrap estimators, a jack-knife estimator and a heteroscedasticity-consistent (HC) variance estimator were compared using simulation. Two types of meta-analyses were compared, a two-stage meta-analysis pooling results, and a one-stage meta-analysis pooling datasets.ResultsUsing a two-stage meta-analysis, coverage of the point estimate using bootstrapped estimators deviated from nominal levels at weak instrument settings and/or outcome probabilities ≤ 0.10. The jack-knife estimator was the least biased resampling method, the HC estimator often failed at outcome probabilities ≤ 0.50 and overall the delta method estimators were the least biased. In the presence of between-study heterogeneity, the delta method before meta-analysis performed best. Using a one-stage meta-analysis all methods performed equally well and better than two-stage meta-analysis of greater or equal size.ConclusionsIn the presence of between-study heterogeneity, two-stage meta-analyses should preferentially use the delta method before meta-analysis. Weak instrument bias can be reduced by performing a one-stage meta-analysis.

| S-EPMC5654757 | biostudies-literature

Placental abruption and perinatal mortality with preterm delivery as a mediator: disentangling direct and indirect effects.

Project description:The authors use recent methodology in causal inference to disentangle the direct and indirect effects that operate through a mediator in an exposure-response association paradigm. They demonstrate how total effects can be partitioned into direct and indirect effects even when the exposure and mediator interact. The impact of bias due to unmeasured confounding on the exposure-response association is assessed through a series of sensitivity analyses. These methods are applied to a problem in perinatal epidemiology to examine the extent to which the effect of abruption on perinatal mortality is mediated through preterm delivery. Data on over 26 million US singleton births (1995-2002) were utilized. Risks of mortality among abruption and nonabruption births were 102.7 and 6.2 per 1,000 births, respectively. Risk ratios of the natural direct and indirect (preterm delivery-mediated) effects of abruption on mortality were 10.18 (95% confidence interval: 9.80, 10.58) and 1.35 (95% confidence interval: 1.33, 1.38), respectively. The proportion of increased mortality risk mediated through preterm delivery was 28.1%, with even higher proportions associated with deliveries at earlier gestational ages. Sensitivity analyses underscore that the qualitative conclusions of some mediated effects and substantial direct effects are reasonably robust to unmeasured confounding of a fairly considerable magnitude.

| S-EPMC3159429 | biostudies-literature

EIGENVALUE DISTRIBUTIONS OF VARIANCE COMPONENTS ESTIMATORS IN HIGH-DIMENSIONAL RANDOM EFFECTS MODELS.

Project description:We study the spectra of MANOVA estimators for variance component covariance matrices in multivariate random effects models. When the dimensionality of the observations is large and comparable to the number of realizations of each random effect, we show that the empirical spectra of such estimators are well-approximated by deterministic laws. The Stieltjes transforms of these laws are characterized by systems of fixed-point equations, which are numerically solvable by a simple iterative procedure. Our proof uses operator-valued free probability theory, and we establish a general asymptotic freeness result for families of rectangular orthogonally-invariant random matrices, which is of independent interest. Our work is motivated in part by the estimation of components of covariance between multiple phenotypic traits in quantitative genetics, and we specialize our results to common experimental designs that arise in this application.

| S-EPMC6713485 | biostudies-literature

Understanding the potential bias of variance components estimators when using genomic models.

Project description:BackgroundGenomic models that link phenotypes to dense genotype information are increasingly being used for infering variance parameters in genetics studies. The variance parameters of these models can be inferred using restricted maximum likelihood, which produces consistent, asymptotically normal estimates of variance components under the true model. These properties are not guaranteed to hold when the covariance structure of the data specified by the genomic model differs substantially from the covariance structure specified by the true model, and in this case, the likelihood of the model is said to be misspecified. If the covariance structure specified by the genomic model provides a poor description of that specified by the true model, the likelihood misspecification may lead to incorrect inferences.ResultsThis work provides a theoretical analysis of the genomic models based on splitting the misspecified likelihood equations into components, which isolate those that contribute to incorrect inferences, providing an informative measure, defined as [Formula: see text], to compare the covariance structure of the data specified by the genomic and the true models. This comparison of the covariance structures allows us to determine whether or not bias in the variance components estimates is expected to occur.ConclusionsThe theory presented can be used to provide an explanation for the success of a number of recently reported approaches that are suggested to remove sources of bias of heritability estimates. Furthermore, however complex is the quantification of this bias, we can determine that, in genomic models that consider a single genomic component to estimate heritability (assuming SNP effects are all i.i.d.), the bias of the estimator tends to be downward, when it exists.

| S-EPMC6080367 | biostudies-literature

Pragmatic trials: ignoring a mediator and adjusting for confounding.

Project description:ObjectivesIn pragmatic trials, the new treatment is compared with usual care (heterogeneous control arm) that makes the comparison of the new treatment with each treatment within the control arm more difficult. The usual assumption is that we can fully capture the relations between different quantities. In this paper we use simulation to assess the performance of statistical methods that adjust for confounding when the assumed relations are not true. The true relations contain a mediator and heterogeneity with or without confounding, but the assumption is that there is no mediator and that confounding and heterogeneity are fully captured. The statistical methods that are compared include multivariable logistic regression, propensity score, disease risk score, inverse probability weighting, doubly robust inverse probability weighting and standardisation.ResultsThe misconception that there is no mediator can cause to misleading comparative effectiveness of individual treatments when a method that estimates the conditional causal effect is used. Using a method that estimates the marginal causal effect is a better approach, but not for all scenarios.

| S-EPMC6425675 | biostudies-literature

The Stat3/GR interaction code: predictive value of direct/indirect DNA recruitment for transcription outcome

Project description:Transcription factor recruitment to genomic sites of action is primarily due to direct protein:DNA interactions. The subsequent recruitment of co-regulatory complexes leads to either transcriptional activation or repression. In contrast to this canonical scheme, some transcription factors such as the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) behave as transcriptional repressors when recruited to target genes through protein tethering. We have investigated the genome-wide prevalence of tethering between GR and Stat3 and found non-reciprocal interactions, namely that GR tethering to DNA-bound Stat3 results in transcriptional repression whereas Stat3 tethering to GR results in synergism. Further, other schemes of GR and Stat3 co-recruitment to regulatory modules result in transcriptional synergism, including neighbouring and composite binding sites. The results indicate extensive transcriptional interactions between Stat3 and GR; further, they provide a genome-wide assessment of transcriptional regulation by tethering and a molecular basis for integration of signals mediated by GR and Stats in health and disease. ChIP-seq analysis of Stat3 and GR binding sites in pituitary corticotroph AtT-20 cell model. Five independant ChIPs were pooled prior library preparation for each contitions: STAT3 (LIF), STAT3 (Dex+LIF), GR (Dex+LIF), GR (Dex) and control IgG.

2012-06-06 | E-GEOD-37235 | biostudies-arrayexpress

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data