Dataset Information

Systemic gene expression profiles according to pain types in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury.

ABSTRACT: Pain affects most individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Major pain types after SCI are neuropathic or nociceptive, often experienced concurrently. Pain after SCI may be refractory to treatments and negatively affects quality of life. Previously, we analyzed whole blood gene expression in individuals with chronic SCI compared to able-bodied (AB) individuals. Most participants with SCI reported pain (N = 19/28). Here, we examined gene expression of participants with SCI by pain status. Compared to AB, participants with SCI with pain had 468 differentially expressed (DE) genes; participants without pain had 564 DE genes (FDR < 0.05). Among DE genes distinct to participants with SCI with pain, Gene Ontology Biological Process (GOBP) analysis showed upregulated genes were enriched in categories related to T cell activation or inflammation; downregulated genes were enriched in categories related to protein proteolysis and catabolism. Although most participants with pain reported multiple pain types concurrently, we performed a preliminary comparison of gene expression by worst pain problem type. Compared to AB, participants with SCI who ranked neuropathic (N = 9) as worst had one distinct DE gene (TMEM156); participants who ranked nociceptive (N = 10) as worst had 61 distinct DE genes (FDR < 0.05). In the nociceptive group, the GOBP category with the lowest P-value identified among upregulated genes was "positive regulation of T cell activation"; among downregulated genes it was "receptor tyrosine kinase binding". An exploratory comparison of pain groups by principal components analysis also showed that the nociceptive group was enriched in T-cell related genes. A correlation analysis identified genes significantly correlated with pain intensity in the neuropathic or nociceptive groups (N = 145, 65, respectively, Pearson's correlation r > 0.8). While this pilot study highlights challenges of identifying gene expression profiles that correlate with specific types of pain in individuals with SCI, it suggests that T-cell signaling should be further investigated in this context.

SUBMITTER: Morrison D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8053765 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe prevalence of comorbid pain after spinal cord injury (SCI) is relatively high in clinical observations and has continued to increase over time. Neuropathic pain (70.14%) is the most popular subject in academic journals after SCI. However, studies that used the bibliometric method to analyze comorbid pain after SCI are still lacking. This study is aimed at combining and integrating acquired information to analyze the global trends of research on the comorbidity of pain after SCI in the last three decades (1990-2019).MethodsSystematic works of literature published from 1990 to 2019 were obtained from the Web of Science Core Collection. CiteSpace software was used to analyze the relationship of publication year with the country, institution, journals, authors, references, and keywords. The regression analysis is used to evaluate the percentage of the category increase or decrease over time significantly. IBM SPSS Statistics was used in the statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 730 publications were included in the analysis. A remarkable increase in the number of publications was observed in the study period (P < 0.05). A total of 202 academic journals focused on the categories of clinical neurology, neurosciences, and rehabilitation, and the annual growth rate of articles in these three categories was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The USA (356, 48.77%) and the University of Miami (64, 8.77%) were the country and institution with the highest number of publications, respectively. Spinal Cord, which was the main journal for research on pain after SCI, had the most publications (88, 12.05%). Burst keywords showed that the individual, inflammation, and central sensitization with pain after SCI are the research development trends and focus in this research field.ConclusionsOverall, this study provides the latest research direction for pain after SCI. This historical overview of research into pain after SCI will be a useful basis for further research into development trends, focus issues, cooperators, and cooperative institutions.

Project description:Study designCohort study.ObjectivesShoulder pain prevalence is high in those with spinal cord injury (SCI) and is associated with decreased function, participation restrictions and decreased quality of life. Limited evidence exists regarding physical impairments of newly acquired SCI. The current study compared musculoskeletal factors at rehabilitation initiation in individuals with newly acquired SCI to uninjured individuals. We hypothesized no impairment differences of shoulder pain, strength, mobility, muscle extensibility, or rotator cuff integrity would exist between groups.SettingMulti-site laboratory setting.MethodsThirty-five individuals with newly acquired SCI and age and gender-matched controls without SCI (n = 34) participated. Musculoskeletal Pain Survey, shoulder range of motion (ROM), strength, pectoralis minor muscle extensibility (PM) and tissue integrity [Ultrasound Pathology Rating Scale (USPRS)] were obtained.ResultsHigher pain was reported by individuals experiencing new SCI along with lower strength across all bilateral measures, reduced elevation, external rotation, and horizontal adduction ROM, with large effect sizes. PM bilateral extensibility was reduced compared to controls, with moderate between group effect size; however, no USPRS score difference existed.ConclusionsThis study provided the first comprehensive clinical description for individuals with newly acquired SCI. In comparison to matched uninjured controls, participants with new SCI reported greater shoulder pain with impairments in mobility, strength, and extensibility. The identified early clinical impairments aligned with progressive impairment including further pain development and persistence. Awareness and modification of these early clinical impairments may lead to improved long-term outcomes, improving the overall health and well-being of individuals with newly acquired SCI.SponsorshipSpinal Cord Injury Research Program Investigator-Initiated Research Award under Award No. W81XWH-17-1-0476.

Project description:BackgroundTranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) is a non-invasive modality in which electrodes can stimulate spinal circuitries and facilitate a motor response. This review aimed to evaluate the methodology of studies using tSCS to generate motor activity in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and to appraise the quality of included trials.MethodsA systematic search for studies published until May 2021 was made of the following databases: EMBASE, Medline (Ovid) and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently screened the studies, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of included trials. The electrical characteristics of stimulation were summarised to allow for comparison across studies. In addition, the surface electromyography (EMG) recording methods were evaluated.ResultsA total of 3753 articles were initially screened, of which 25 met the criteria for inclusion. Studies were divided into those using tSCS for neurophysiological investigations of reflex responses (n = 9) and therapeutic investigations of motor recovery (n = 16). The overall quality of evidence was deemed to be poor-to-fair (10.5 ± 4.9) based on the Downs and Black Quality Checklist criteria. The electrical characteristics were collated to establish the dosage range across stimulation trials. The methods employed by included studies relating to stimulation parameters and outcome measurement varied extensively, although some trends are beginning to appear in relation to electrode configuration and EMG outcomes.ConclusionThis review outlines the parameters currently employed for tSCS of the cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar regions to produce motor responses. However, to establish standardised procedures for neurophysiological assessments and therapeutic investigations of tSCS, further high-quality investigations are required, ideally utilizing consistent electrophysiological recording methods, and reporting common characteristics of the electrical stimulation administered.

Dataset Information

Systemic gene expression profiles according to pain types in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure