Dataset Information

Outlook into the future of front-line immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Immune checkpoint inhibition has been approved for front-line treatment of metastatic bladder cancer in patients who are cisplatin-ineligible and demonstrate programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity. This approval followed the positive results of IMvigor210 and KEYNOTE-052 studies. Immunotherapy has also demonstrated efficacy as maintenance therapy patients for patients who initially respond to platinum-based chemotherapy. Other studies have investigated combinations of immunotherapy with chemotherapy, combinations between immunotherapies, and immunotherapy with novel agents. Although these combinations have demonstrated promise, further investigation is necessary to optimize the patients who would benefit from these approaches. Biomarkers beyond PD-L1 scoring can help predict response and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibition and will be integral to future studies.

SUBMITTER: Brown JR

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8053833 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Outlook into the future of front-line immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Brown Jason R JR Krane Spencer S Garcia Jorge J Barata Pedro C PC

Therapeutic advances in urology 20210101

Immune checkpoint inhibition has been approved for front-line treatment of metastatic bladder cancer in patients who are cisplatin-ineligible and demonstrate programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity. This approval followed the positive results of IMvigor210 and KEYNOTE-052 studies. Immunotherapy has also demonstrated efficacy as maintenance therapy patients for patients who initially respond to platinum-based chemotherapy. Other studies have investigated combinations of immunotherapy with ch ...[more]

PMID: 33948120

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLimited data compare first-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade in cisplatin-ineligible metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. The primary evidence guiding treatment decisions was a recent Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Agency safety alert based on emerging data from two ongoing phase III trials, reporting shorter survival in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-negative patients receiving immunotherapy. Final results from these trials are unknown.ObjectiveTo compare survival in cisplatin-ineligible mUC patients receiving first-line immunotherapy versus those receiving carboplatin-based chemotherapy.Design, setting, and participantsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2017 mUC patients receiving first-line carboplatin-based chemotherapy (n = 1530) or immunotherapy (n = 487) from January 1, 2011 to May 18, 2018 using the Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived database.Outcome measurements and statistical analysisThe primary outcomes were overall survival (OS), comparing 12- and 36-mo OS, and hazard ratios before and after 12 mo. Propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to address confounding in Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model estimates of comparative effectiveness.Results and limitationsIPTW-adjusted OS rates in the immunotherapy group were lower at 12 mo (39.6% [95% confidence interval {CI} 34.0-45.3%] vs 46.1% [95% CI 43.4-48.8%]) but higher at 36 mo (28.3% [95% CI 21.8-34.7%] vs 13.3% [95% CI 11.1-15.5%]) relative to the chemotherapy group. Immunotherapy treatment demonstrated inferior OS during the first 12 mo relative to carboplatin-based chemotherapy (IPTW-adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.62), but superior OS beyond 12 mo (IPTW-adjusted HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.30-0.85). Limitations include retrospective design and potential unmeasured confounding.ConclusionsIn the setting of mUC, clinicians and patients should carefully consider how to balance the short-term benefit of chemotherapy against the long-term benefit of immunotherapy.Patient summaryTo determine the optimal first-line therapy for metastatic bladder cancer patients who are unfit for cisplatin, we compared carboplatin-based chemotherapy versus immunotherapy using real-world data. Survival in the 1st year of treatment was lower with immunotherapy relative to chemotherapy, but for patients surviving beyond the 1st year, immunotherapy was superior.

Project description:IntroductionClinical trials investigating efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revealed sex-specific divergent outcomes in urothelial cancer (UC), suggesting that sex hormones might play an important role in gender-specific dimorphisms of response upon ICI. However, further clinical investigations are still needed to understand the influence of sex hormones in UC. The aim of this study was to get further insights on the prognostic and predictive value of sex hormone levels in patients with metastatic UC (mUC) who underwent ICI.Material and methodsSex hormone levels of patients with mUC including luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), LH/FSH ratio, prolactin, testosterone and 17β-estradiol (E2) were evaluated at baseline and during ICI at 6/8 weeks and 12/14 weeks.ResultsTwenty-eight patients (10 women, 18 men) with a median age of 70 years were included. Metastatic disease was confirmed in 21 patients (75%) after radical cystectomy while seven patients showed mUC at first diagnosis. Twelve patients (42.8%) received first line and 16 patients second line pembrolizumab. The objective response rate (ORR) was 39% (CR in 7%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 5.5 and 20 months. Focusing on changes of sex hormone levels during ICI, a significant increase in FSH levels and decrease of the LH/FSH ratio was noticed in responders (p = 0.035), yet without sex-specific significance. When adjusted for sex and treatment line, a significant increase of FSH levels was confirmed in men during second line pembrolizumab. Focusing on baseline levels, LH/FSH ratio was significantly higher in female responders (p = 0.043) compared to non-responders. In women, increased LH levels and LH/FSH ratio were associated with better PFS (p = 0.014 for LH, p = 0.016 for LH/FSH ratio) and OS (p = 0.026 and p = 0.018). In male patients, increased E2 levels were linked with improved PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p = 0.039).ConclusionIncreased LH and LH/FSH values in women as well as high E2 levels in men were significant predictors of better survival. Elevated LH/FSH ratio was predictive of better response to ICI in women. These results show first clinical evidence of the potential role of sex hormones as prognostic and predictive biomarker in mUC. Further prospective analyses are needed to corroborate our findings.

Dataset Information

Outlook into the future of front-line immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Publications

Outlook into the future of front-line immune checkpoint inhibition in metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets