Dataset Information

Trust your gut: vagal nerve stimulation in humans improves reinforcement learning.

ABSTRACT: Whereas the effect of vagal nerve stimulation on emotional states is well established, its effect on cognitive functions is still unclear. Recent rodent studies show that vagal activation enhances reinforcement learning and neuronal dopamine release. The influence of vagal nerve stimulation on reinforcement learning in humans is still unknown. Here, we studied the effect of transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation on reinforcement learning in eight long-standing seizure-free epilepsy patients, using a well-established forced-choice reward-based paradigm in a cross-sectional, within-subject study design. We investigated vagal nerve stimulation effects on overall accuracy using non-parametric cluster-based permutation tests. Furthermore, we modelled sub-components of the decision process using drift-diffusion modelling. We found higher accuracies in the vagal nerve stimulation condition compared to sham stimulation. Modelling suggests a stimulation-dependent increase in reward sensitivity and shift of accuracy-speed trade-offs towards maximizing rewards. Moreover, vagal nerve stimulation was associated with increased non-decision times suggesting enhanced sensory or attentional processes. No differences of starting bias were detected for both conditions. Accuracies in the extinction phase were higher in later trials of the vagal nerve stimulation condition, suggesting a perseverative effect compared to sham. Together, our results provide first evidence of causal vagal influence on human reinforcement learning and might have clinical implications for the usage of vagal stimulation in learning deficiency.

SUBMITTER: Weber I

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8066886 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:This study aimed to evaluate effects of electric vagal nerve stimulation on early postoperation cognitive dysfunction in aged rats. METHODS:A total of 33 male Sprague Dawley rats were selected and assigned randomly to three groups, control group (C, n?=?10), splenectomy group (S, n?=?10) and splenectomy+vagal nerve stimulation group (SV, n?=?13). Behavior and memory of rats were evaluated by Open Field Test and Morris Water Maze. Levels of TNF-?, IL-6 and IL-10 in serum were measured by ELISA. The level of TNF-? protein in hippocampus was assessed by Western blotting. rt-PCR was used to detect mRNA expression of NF-?B in hippocampus. RESULTS:During anesthesia/operation, vital life signs of rats were stable. In SV group, vagal nerve stimulation decreased heart rate lower than 10% of basic level and kept it at a stable range by regulating stimulation intensity. After stimulation stop, heart rate returned to the basic level again. This indicated that the model of vagal nerve stimulation was successful. Serum levels of TNF-? and IL-6 increased by the operation/anesthesia, but they decreased with vagal nerve stimulation (all P?<?0.05). TNF-? protein and mRNA expression of NF-?B in hippocampus were also eliminated by vagal nerve stimulation compared to S group (P?<?0.05). Results of Morris Water Maze showed escape latency of postoperation in S group was significantly longer than C group (P?<?0.05), and times of crossing platform in S group was lower than that of C group (P?<?0.05). Although escape latency of postopration in SV group was shorter than that of S group, there was no significant difference between two groups. Meanwhile there were no significant differences of behavior test in Open Field test between three groups, although vagal nerve stimulation improved partly active explore behavior compared to S group. CONCLUSION:The inflammation caused by operation and general anesthesia was an important reason of early postoperation cognitive dysfunction, and electric vagal nerve stimulation could inhibit the inflammation. Meanwhile, vagal nerve stimulation could ameliorate early postoperation cognitive dysfunction partly, but its protective effects were not enough and should be studied and improved in future.

Project description:BackgroundAmbulation is an essential aspect of daily living and is often impaired after brain and spinal cord injuries. Despite the implementation of standard neurorehabilitative care, locomotor recovery is often incomplete.ObjectiveIn this randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind, parallel design study, we aimed to determine if anodal transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation (anodal tsDCS) could improve training effects on locomotion compared to sham (sham tsDCS) in healthy subjects.Methods43 participants underwent a single backwards locomotion training (BLT) session on a reverse treadmill with concurrent anodal (n = 22) or sham (n = 21) tsDCS. The primary outcome measure was speed gain measured 24 h post-training. We hypothesized that anodal tsDCS + BLT would improve training effects on backward locomotor speed compared to sham tsDCS + BLT. A subset of participants (n = 31) returned for two additional training days of either anodal (n = 16) or sham (n = 15) tsDCS and underwent (n = 29) H-reflex testing immediately before, immediately after, and 30 min post-training over three consecutive days.ResultsA single session of anodal tsDCS + BLT elicited greater speed gain at 24 h relative to sham tsDCS + BLT (p = 0.008, two-sample t-test, adjusted for one interim analysis after the initial 12 subjects). Anodal tsDCS + BLT resulted in higher retention of the acquired skill at day 30 relative to sham tsDCS + BLT (p = 0.002) in the absence of significant group differences in online or offline learning over the three training days (p = 0.467 and p = 0.131). BLT resulted in transient down-regulation of H-reflex amplitude (Hmax/Mmax) in both test groups (p < 0.0001). However, the concurrent application of anodal-tsDCS with BLT elicited a longer lasting effect than sham-tsDCS + BLT (p = 0.050).ConclusiontsDCS improved locomotor skill acquisition and retention in healthy subjects and prolonged the physiological exercise-mediated downregulation of excitability of the alpha motoneuron pool. These results suggest that this strategy is worth exploring in neurorehabilitation of locomotor function.

Dataset Information

Trust your gut: vagal nerve stimulation in humans improves reinforcement learning.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets