Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Feasibility of Non-Exposure Simple Suturing Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection in Comparison with Laparoscopic Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Subepithelial Tumors: Results of Two Independent Prospective Trials.


ABSTRACT: Recently, nonexposure simple suturing endoscopic full-thickness resection (NESS-EFTR) method was developed to avoid tumor exposure to the peritoneal cavity. The aim of this study is to compare the short-term outcomes of the NESS-EFTR method with those of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric subepithelial tumors (SETs). A prospective single-center trial of LECS for gastric SETs was performed from March 2012 to October 2013 with a separate prospective trial of NESS-EFTR performed from August 2015 to June 2017, enrolling 15 patients each. Among the 30 enrolled patients, 14 who underwent LECS and 11 who underwent NESS-EFTR were finally included in the analysis. The rate of complete resection and successful closure was 100% in both groups. The operating time was longer for NESS-EFTR group than for LECS (110 vs. 189 min; p < 0.0001). There were no postoperative complications except one case of transient fever in the NESS-EFTR group. One patient in the LECS group had peritoneal seeding of gastrointestinal stromal tumor at 17 months postoperatively, and there was no other recurrence. Although NESS-EFTR had long operating and procedure times, it was feasible for patients with gastric SETs requiring a nonexposure technique.

SUBMITTER: Eom BW 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8069039 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5806927 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7087464 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7521979 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6669323 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5956064 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4607707 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4648854 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7003143 | biostudies-literature