Dataset Information

Assessment of satisfaction and associated factors of parturients underwent cesarean section with spinal anesthesia at the General Hospital, Ethiopia; 2019.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aim

Spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is now a day a popular plan of anesthesia because of its rapid onset and high frequency of successful blockade. It is a vital monitor to the quality of care in anesthesia. The main aim of this study was to assess the level of maternal satisfaction and associated factors after cesarean section under spinal.

Methods

Hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted on mothers who underwent cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Descriptive analysis and chi-square test were employed. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression was used to measure the association of factors with the level of satisfaction. A p-value of ≤0.25 and ≤ 0.05 was used to decide statistical significance for bivariable and multivariable logistic regression respectively.

Findings

The overall satisfaction level of parturients after spinal anesthesia was 97(80.2%). The satisfaction level was 83.3% with PONV treatment, 98.3% with intraoperative analgesia, between 52.5% and 64.2% to preoperative activities, and 72.5% for postoperative patient care by the anesthetist. Having previous anesthesia was the independent factor that has a significant association with the level of satisfaction with AOR, 3.94; 95%CI, 1.24-12.45; P- 0.01.

Conclusion

In general, the overall satisfaction of the mothers towards spinal anesthesia was fair with a satisfaction score of 80.2%. Parturients were highly dissatisfied with the preoperative visit and information subscale as compared to the other subscales.

SUBMITTER: Demilew BC

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8080466 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Spinal anesthesia-induced maternal hypotension is the most frequent complication associated with maternal morbidity and mortality during Cesarean section. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and magnitude of hemodynamic changes in preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic parturients undergone Cesarean section under spinal anesthesia. Method:A prospective cohort study was conducted from 01 February to 28 May 2019 in preeclamptic and non-preeclamptic parturients. We hypothesized preeclamptic parturients are at high risk of spinal anesthesia induced hypotension than non preeclamptics. A total of 122 ASA II and ASA III parturients were recruited consecutively and assigned to two groups (81non-preeclamptics, and 41 preeclamptics). Parturients with cardiac disease, twin pregnancy, chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, superimposed hypertension, renal disease, diabetes mellitus, coagulopathy (platelet count <?80?×?109/L), active labor, eclampsia, abruptio placentae, placenta praevia, any adjuvant added with local anesthetics were excluded. The data analysis was done using SPSS version 22 statistical software. Student t test, MannWhitney U test and Fisher exact test were used to compare the data. All P values <?0.05 were considered statistically significant. Result:The incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension was higher in non-preeclamptic parturients than preeclamptic parturients (55.6% vs. 34.1%, respectively) and the degree of blood pressure drop was significantly greater in the non-preeclamptic parturients compared to those with preeclampsia; As well intraoperative fluid consumption was significantly greater in the non-preeclamptics parturients compared to those with preeclamptics. Conclusion:The incidence and magnitude of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergone Cesarean section were less in preeclamptic parturients than in non-preeclamptic parturients.. Based on the data from this study we recommended spinal anesthesia for preeclamptic patients, unless there is a contra indication based on preeclampsia.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Anticoagulant therapy during pregnancy is widely used due to the increasing awareness of maternal hypercoagulability. Few studies have reported the use of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in these parturients. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive spinal anesthesia in parturients with anticoagulation therapy undergoing cesarean section. METHODS:This was a randomized, controlled study conducted in 239 parturients using anticoagulants and undergoing selective cesarean section. 37 parturients withdrew, and finally parturients received spinal anesthesia using 27gauge pen type fine spinal needles (experimental group, n?=?110) and 22gauge traditional spinal needles (control group, n?=?92). The primary efficacy outcomes included low back pain (LBP) and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) after delivery. Secondary efficacy outcomes included visual analogue scale during subarachnoid puncture (VASdural), difference between visual analogue scale (VAS) during peripheral venipuncture and VASdural (?VAS), VAS of back puncture point 24, 48 and 72?h after operation (VASdural-24?h, VASdural-48?h and VASdural-72?h, respectively), maternal satisfaction and hospitalization stay. RESULTS:No parturient had PDPH and was suspected with spinal or intracranial haematoma in two groups. There was no significant difference in VASlbp-24?h, VASlbp-48?h and VASlbp-72?h (P?=?0.056; P?=?0.813; P?=?0.189, respectively) between two groups. In experimental group, VASdural (P?=?0.017), ?VAS (P?=?0.001) and VASdural-24?h (P?<?0.0001) were lower, whereas maternal satisfaction was higher (P?=?0.046). There was no significant difference in VASdural-48?h, VASdural-72?h, urination function, strength recovery and hospitalization stay (P?=?0.069; P?=?0.667; P?=?0.105; P?=?0.133; P?=?0.754, respectively) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS:Minimally invasive spinal anesthesia provided lower VASdural, VASdrual-24?h and a higher maternal satisfaction. Hence, it is considered as a safe, reliable and reasonable option for cesarean section parturients during maternal anticoagulation therapy with normal platelet count and coagulation time. TRIAL REGISTRATION:This study was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov at November 11th, 2016 ( NCT02987192 ).