Dataset Information

Cold scissors versus electrosurgery for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: A meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Intrauterine adhesion seriously affects reproductive health in women. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using cold scissors or electrosurgery is the main treatment, although there is no consensus on the preferable method. This review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these methods for treating moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched on April 30, 2020. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that were published in all languages (must contain English abstracts) and compared hysteroscopic cold scissors with electrosurgery for the treatment of intrauterine adhesion were included. Mean differences, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Data were analyzed using RevMan software (Review Manager version 5.3, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. If a consensus was not reached, a third researcher was consulted.

Results

Nine studies (n = 761; 6 randomized controlled trials and 3 retrospective studies) were included. The intrauterine adhesion recurrence rate with second look hysteroscopy was significantly lower (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.16-0.56; P = .0002) with hysteroscopic cold scissors than with electrosurgery. The total operation time was significantly shorter (mean difference = -7.78, 95% confidence interval = -8.50 to -7.07; P < .00001), intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (mean difference = -9.88, 95% CI = -11.25 to -8.51; P < .00001), and the menstrual flow rate was significantly higher (odds ratio = 4.36, 95% confidence interval = 2.56-7.43; P < .00001) with hysteroscopic cold scissors than with electrosurgery. There were no significant differences in the pregnancy rate. One complication (1 perforation case, hysteroscopic cold scissors group) was reported.

Conclusions

Hysteroscopic cold scissors is more efficient in preventing intrauterine adhesion recurrence, increasing the menstrual flow, reducing intraoperative blood loss, and shortening the operation time.

SUBMITTER: Yang L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8084071 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Very few studies have been conducted regarding the optimal time interval between hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and the embryo transfer (ET). Investigation of this optimal time may be helpful for assisted reproductive technology. Therefore, we investigated effects of the interval between hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and ET upon in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes. METHODS:Patients were recruited between January 2014 and September 2017 at the Reproductive Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University. Patients who were diagnosed with intra-uterine adhesion (IUA) and underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis before fresh IVF-ET or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were classified into three groups according to the interval between hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and ET: less than 90 days (Group 1), 90 to 180 days (Group 2), and greater than 180 days (Group 3). Baseline characteristics, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) response, and pregnancy outcomes after ET were compared. Analysis of variance or non-parametric tests were used to test numerical data. The Pearson's Chi-squared test was used to test categorical data. RESULTS:A total of 312 patients were recruited as follows: 112 in Group 1, 137 in Group 2, and 63 in Group 3. There were no differences in baseline and COS characteristics among the three groups. The live-birth rate in Group 2 (40.1%) was significantly higher than that in Group 1 (17.9%; χ = 14.545, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rates of biochemical, ongoing, and clinical pregnancy, and biochemical and clinical pregnancy abortion, as well as stillbirth among the groups. In the mild IUA patients, the live-birth rate was significantly higher in Group 2 (42.6%) compared with Group 1 (22%; χ = 8.413, P = 0.004). In the moderate IUA patients, Group 2 (35.7%) had a higher frequency of live births than Group 1 (6.7%; χ = 8.187, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS:The optimal waiting period for fresh ET after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was 90 to 180 days in the current study.

Project description:BackgroundIn a previous study, we reported that amnion promotes endometrial cell growth by regulating cytokines. In this study, hierarchical cluster analysis enabled the evaluation of cytokine expression changes after amnion treatment to be explored by cluster patterns. The role of IL1B on endometrial repair and receptivity was revealed.MethodsA total of 30 patients were recruited in this clinical trial (NCT02496052) of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. They were randomly allocated into an amnion grafts group (amnion group) and a control group. After hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, a Foley catheter covered with a sterilized freeze-dried amnion graft was inserted into the uterine cavity of the participants in the amnion group, whereas for the control group, a Foley catheter without amnion graft was inserted. After surgery, patient follow-up was done for a year. Uterine exudates were collected every day for seven days after surgery, and analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to compare expression patterns of each cytokine. Single-gene gene set enrichment analysis and differentially expressed genes enrichment analysis of IL1B were performed using NCBI GEO (N=151) to evaluate its potential mechanisms and impact on endometrial receptivity.ResultsCompared to the control group, cytokine expression patterns of the amnion group revealed significant stratifications, which were highly correlated with the expression levels of IL1B on the sixth to seventh day after surgery, improving the pregnant rate. Wilcoxon test revealed significantly low expression levels of IL1B in the reduced endometrial receptivity group compared to the normal group. Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis showed that lysosomes, cell cycle, and calcium signaling pathways were associated with the biological processes in which IL1B plays a role. Screening and enrichment analyses of differentially expressed genes further verified the mechanisms of action of IL1B on endometrial repair and receptivity recovery.ConclusionsAmnion promotes endometrial repair and receptivity by altering the expression levels and patterns of IL1B. Furthermore, by affecting lysosomal, cell cycle, and calcium signaling pathways, IL1B may be one of the factors involved in endometrial repair and receptivity recovery.