Dataset Information

Hierarchical cluster analysis in the study of the effect of cytokine expression patterns on endometrial repair and receptivity after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

In a previous study, we reported that amnion promotes endometrial cell growth by regulating cytokines. In this study, hierarchical cluster analysis enabled the evaluation of cytokine expression changes after amnion treatment to be explored by cluster patterns. The role of IL1B on endometrial repair and receptivity was revealed.

Methods

A total of 30 patients were recruited in this clinical trial (NCT02496052) of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. They were randomly allocated into an amnion grafts group (amnion group) and a control group. After hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, a Foley catheter covered with a sterilized freeze-dried amnion graft was inserted into the uterine cavity of the participants in the amnion group, whereas for the control group, a Foley catheter without amnion graft was inserted. After surgery, patient follow-up was done for a year. Uterine exudates were collected every day for seven days after surgery, and analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed to compare expression patterns of each cytokine. Single-gene gene set enrichment analysis and differentially expressed genes enrichment analysis of IL1B were performed using NCBI GEO (N=151) to evaluate its potential mechanisms and impact on endometrial receptivity.

Results

Compared to the control group, cytokine expression patterns of the amnion group revealed significant stratifications, which were highly correlated with the expression levels of IL1B on the sixth to seventh day after surgery, improving the pregnant rate. Wilcoxon test revealed significantly low expression levels of IL1B in the reduced endometrial receptivity group compared to the normal group. Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis showed that lysosomes, cell cycle, and calcium signaling pathways were associated with the biological processes in which IL1B plays a role. Screening and enrichment analyses of differentially expressed genes further verified the mechanisms of action of IL1B on endometrial repair and receptivity recovery.

Conclusions

Amnion promotes endometrial repair and receptivity by altering the expression levels and patterns of IL1B. Furthermore, by affecting lysosomal, cell cycle, and calcium signaling pathways, IL1B may be one of the factors involved in endometrial repair and receptivity recovery.

SUBMITTER: Li B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8246193 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundIntrauterine adhesion seriously affects reproductive health in women. Hysteroscopic adhesiolysis using cold scissors or electrosurgery is the main treatment, although there is no consensus on the preferable method. This review aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these methods for treating moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion.MethodsPubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure were searched on April 30, 2020. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies that were published in all languages (must contain English abstracts) and compared hysteroscopic cold scissors with electrosurgery for the treatment of intrauterine adhesion were included. Mean differences, odds ratios, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias assessment tool for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Data were analyzed using RevMan software (Review Manager version 5.3, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014). Two researchers independently extracted data and assessed the quality of the included studies. If a consensus was not reached, a third researcher was consulted.ResultsNine studies (n = 761; 6 randomized controlled trials and 3 retrospective studies) were included. The intrauterine adhesion recurrence rate with second look hysteroscopy was significantly lower (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.16-0.56; P = .0002) with hysteroscopic cold scissors than with electrosurgery. The total operation time was significantly shorter (mean difference = -7.78, 95% confidence interval = -8.50 to -7.07; P < .00001), intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower (mean difference = -9.88, 95% CI = -11.25 to -8.51; P < .00001), and the menstrual flow rate was significantly higher (odds ratio = 4.36, 95% confidence interval = 2.56-7.43; P < .00001) with hysteroscopic cold scissors than with electrosurgery. There were no significant differences in the pregnancy rate. One complication (1 perforation case, hysteroscopic cold scissors group) was reported.ConclusionsHysteroscopic cold scissors is more efficient in preventing intrauterine adhesion recurrence, increasing the menstrual flow, reducing intraoperative blood loss, and shortening the operation time.

Project description:Study questionDoes intentional endometrial injury (i.e. endometrial scratching) during ART enhance pregnancy rates?Summary answerWe propose a randomized controlled clinical trial in women performing ART in which the intervention group will undergo an additional endometrial biopsy during exogenous ovarian stimulation.What is known alreadyAlthough endometrial receptivity has been extensively studied, the mechanisms behind the implantation of an embryo remain largely a mystery. Intentional endometrial injury has been put forward by many researchers as an inexpensive clinical tool capable of enhancing endometrial receptivity. However, despite its widespread use, the benefit of endometrial scratching is still a contentious and unresolved issue.Study design size durationPragmatic two-arm randomized, single-centre, controlled open-label trial in women undergoing exogenous gonadotropin ovarian stimulation for ART followed by a fresh embryo transfer in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist suppressed cycle. The trial will include 360 women in total with a 1:1 allocation ratio and an expected total duration of up to 45 months.Participants/materials setting methodsSubjects in the intervention group will undergo an endometrial biopsy during the follicular phase, on the sixth to eighth day of exogenous stimulation. Furthermore, nested within this clinical trial, we will also evaluate whether the transcriptomic signatures of the material collected during the biopsy may accurately distinguish women who become pregnant from those who do not. These endometrial transcriptomic signatures will be assessed both immediately after the biopsy and following in-vitro decidualization.Main results and the role of chanceOur primary objective is to assess the effect of endometrial injury during exogenous gonadotropin ovarian stimulation on clinical pregnancy rates after ART. Secondary efficacy and safety outcomes include: live-birth delivery after 24 weeks, the endometrial transcriptomic profile among women in the intervention group, short-term safety (e.g. procedure intolerance due to pain, post-procedure bleeding) and long-term safety (e.g. cancelled transfers, miscarriage) outcomes.Limitations reasons for cautionOwing to its pragmatic design, this study may have limited power to determine one or more of our secondary outcomes and whether there are specific subgroups of women who may benefit significantly from performing endometrial scratching and endometrial transcriptomic profiling.Wider implications of the findingsDespite the weak biological plausibility, heterogeneity in the existing randomized controlled trials and lack of evaluation of any potential risks associated with endometrial scratching, this procedure is still widely applied in current clinical practice. This clinical trial aims to pragmatically assess the potential benefits and harms of the generalized use of this strategy.Study funding/competing intereststhis study has received a grant from the Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO, 1524417N). This organization has no further role in the study, namely with regards to protocol development, study conduction and evaluation of results.Trial registration numberNCT02061228.Trial registration date10 February 2014.Date of first patient’s enrolment3 April 2014.Protocol version2.0.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Very few studies have been conducted regarding the optimal time interval between hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and the embryo transfer (ET). Investigation of this optimal time may be helpful for assisted reproductive technology. Therefore, we investigated effects of the interval between hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and ET upon in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle outcomes. METHODS:Patients were recruited between January 2014 and September 2017 at the Reproductive Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University. Patients who were diagnosed with intra-uterine adhesion (IUA) and underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis before fresh IVF-ET or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection cycles were classified into three groups according to the interval between hysteroscopic adhesiolysis and ET: less than 90 days (Group 1), 90 to 180 days (Group 2), and greater than 180 days (Group 3). Baseline characteristics, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) response, and pregnancy outcomes after ET were compared. Analysis of variance or non-parametric tests were used to test numerical data. The Pearson's Chi-squared test was used to test categorical data. RESULTS:A total of 312 patients were recruited as follows: 112 in Group 1, 137 in Group 2, and 63 in Group 3. There were no differences in baseline and COS characteristics among the three groups. The live-birth rate in Group 2 (40.1%) was significantly higher than that in Group 1 (17.9%; χ = 14.545, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the rates of biochemical, ongoing, and clinical pregnancy, and biochemical and clinical pregnancy abortion, as well as stillbirth among the groups. In the mild IUA patients, the live-birth rate was significantly higher in Group 2 (42.6%) compared with Group 1 (22%; χ = 8.413, P = 0.004). In the moderate IUA patients, Group 2 (35.7%) had a higher frequency of live births than Group 1 (6.7%; χ = 8.187, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS:The optimal waiting period for fresh ET after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis was 90 to 180 days in the current study.

Project description:IntroductionHysteroscopic adhesiolysis is widely performed in women with intrauterine adhesions. Small observational studies have reported the obstetric and neonatal outcomes, but studies with larger sample sizes are few. The aim of this study is to evaluate the obstetric and neonatal outcomes in women after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis.MethodsWe conducted a literature search in July 2022 using the PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases, and finally, 32 studies (N = 3812) were included. We did a meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of placenta-related disorders, including placenta previa, placental abruption, placenta accreta, placenta increta, and retained placenta. We also included other obstetric and neonatal outcomes like postpartum hemorrhage, ectopic pregnancy, oligohydramnios, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, and intrauterine growth restriction. The results were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in studies with a control group, but otherwise as prevalence (%) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).ResultsThe overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 58.97% and 45.56%, respectively. The prevalence of placenta previa differed in pregnant women who underwent hysteroscopic adhesiolysis compared with those who did not (OR, 3.27; 95% CI, 1.28-8.36). In studies without a comparative group, the pooled rate of placenta accreta was 7% (95% CI, 4-11) in 20 studies; placenta increta was 1% (95% CI, 0-4) in 5 studies; a retained placenta was 11% (95% CI, 5-24) in 5 studies; postpartum hemorrhage was 12% (95% CI, 8-18) in 12 studies; ectopic pregnancy was 1% (95% CI, 0-2) in 13 studies; oligohydramnios was 3% (95% CI, 1-6) in 3 studies; intrauterine growth restriction was 3% (95% CI, 1-8) in 3 studies; gestational hypertension was 5% (95% CI, 2-11) in 4 studies; and diabetes mellitus was 4% (95% CI, 2-7) in 3 studies.DiscussionDue to the paucity of good quality comparative data, the question of whether there is an increased prevalence of obstetric and neonatal complications in women after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis compared with the general population remains unanswered. The findings from this review will provide a basis for more well-designed studies in the future.Systematic review registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=364021, identifier [CRD42022364021].

Project description:Background and Objectives: A relationship between endometrial polypectomy and in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy outcomes has been reported; however, only a few studies have compared polyp removal techniques and pregnancy rates. We investigated whether different polypectomy techniques with endometrial curettage and hysteroscopic polypectomy for endometrial polyps affect subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: Data from 434 patients who had undergone polypectomy for suspected endometrial polyps using transvaginal ultrasonography before embryo transfer in IVF at four institutions between January 2017 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, there were 157 and 277 patients in the hysteroscopic (mean age: 35.0 years) and curettage (mean age: 37.3 years) groups, respectively. Single-blastocyst transfer cases were selected from both groups and age-matched to unify background factors. Results: In the single-blastocyst transfer cases, 148 (mean age: 35.0 years) and 196 (mean age: 35.9 years) were in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, with the 148 cases matched by age. In these cases, the pregnancy rates for the first embryo transfer were 68.2% (odds ratio (OR): 2.14) and 51.4% (OR: 1.06) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively; the resulting OR was 2.03. The pregnancy rates after up to the second transfer were 80.4% (OR: 4.10) and 68.2% (OR: 2.14) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the OR was 1.91. The live birth rates were 66.2% (OR: 1.956) and 53.4% (OR: 1.15) in the hysteroscopic and curettage groups, respectively, in which the odds ratio was 1.71. These results show the effectiveness of hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy compared to polypectomy with endometrial curettage. No significant difference was found regarding the miscarriage rates between the two groups. Conclusions: Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy resulted in a higher pregnancy rate in subsequent embryo transfer than polypectomy with endometrial curettage. Therefore, establishing a facility where polypectomy can be performed hysteroscopically is crucial.