Dataset Information

Perinatal outcomes of neonates born from different endometrial preparation protocols after frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Previous studies have focused on pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET) performed using different endometrial preparation protocols. Few studies have evaluated the effect of endometrial preparation on pregnancy-related complications. This study was designed to explore the association between different endometrial preparation protocols and adverse obstetric and perinatal complications after FET.

Methods

We retrospectively included all FET cycles (n = 12,950) in our hospital between 2010 and 2017, and categorized them into three groups, natural cycles (NC), hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and ovarian stimulation (OS) protocols. Pregnancy-related complications and subsequent neonatal outcomes were compared among groups.

Results

Among all 12,950 FET cycles, the live birth rate was slightly lower for HRT cycles than for NC (HRT vs. NC: 28.15% vs. 31.16%, p < 0.001). The pregnancy loss rate was significantly higher in OS or HRT cycles than in NC (HRT vs. NC: 17.14% vs. 10.89%, p < 0.001; OS vs. NC: 16.44% vs. 10.89%, p = 0.001). Among 3864 women with live birth, preparing the endometrium using OS or HRT protocols increased the risk of preeclampsia, and intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) in both singleton and multiple deliveries. Additionally, OS and HRT protocols increased the risk of low birth weight (LBW) and small for gestational age (SGA) in both singletons and multiples after FET.

Conclusion

Compared with HRT or OS protocols, preparing the endometrium with NC was associated with the decreased risk of pregnancy-related complications, as well as the decreased risk of LBW and SGA after FET.

SUBMITTER: Li C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8086106 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The optimal protocol for endometrial preparation in patients with infertility remains unclear. Due to this, the current study retrospectively analyzed 1,589 patients with infertility and regular menstrual cycles to assess reproductive outcomes per embryo transferred and per embryo transfer (ET) cycle following the transfer of frozen-thawed embryos (FET) in a modified natural cycle (mNC) or hormone therapy cycle (HT) with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)-induced pituitary suppression. The molecular mechanisms involved were also studied using tissues from endometrial biopsies. Patients who underwent FET were assigned to 5 groups as follows: Group A underwent a mNC (n=276); group B (n=338) received estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4); group C received 1 cycle of GnRHa, E2 and P4 (n=323); group D received 2 cycles of GnRHa, E2 and P4 (n=329); and group E received 3 cycles of GnRHa, E2 and P4 (n=323). Tissues from endometrial biopsies of 91 patients performed on the day of ET were tested for endometrial receptivity marker mRNA expression and microRNA (miR)-223-3p mRNA. Furthermore, endometrial stromal cells (ESCs) were used for an in-depth study of the molecular mechanisms involved. Among the 5 groups of patients, implantation rates, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were not significantly different. However, endometrial receptivity was enhanced in group E when compared with groups A-D, which was associated with endometrial leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF), osteopontin, vascular endothelial growth factor, integrin ?3 and homeobox gene 10 and 11 mRNA upregulation, and miR-223-3p miRNA downregulation. Transfection of ESCs with an miR-223-3p mimic significantly reduced levels of LIF mRNA and protein. In addition, pre-treating ESCs with GnRHa upregulated mRNA and protein expression of the decidualization markers prolactin and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in a time-dependent manner. In conclusion, these results indicated that HT with GnRHa may be a potential endometrial preparation protocol for FET.

Project description:BackgroundTwo types of endometrial preparation protocols are used for frozen embryo transfers in current practice: hormone replacement and the natural cycle. Endometrial preparation in the natural cycle reportedly increases the chances of live birth and decreases early pregnancy loss compared with that in the hormone replacement cycle. However, the influence of endometrial preparation on maternal and neonatal health remains unclear.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate whether the differences between hormone replacement cycle and natural cycle influence perinatal outcomes and risk of congenital anomalies in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer fetuses or births.Study designPerinatal outcomes and congenital abnormalities were compared between the natural and hormone replacement cycles. According to the timing of ovulation, frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers in the natural cycle were classified into 2 patterns: on day 4.5 (ovulation 4.5) or day 5 (ovulation 5.0) after ovulation. When the serum luteinizing hormone level was not increased on the day of the trigger, a single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer was performed on day 7 after the trigger (ovulation 5.0). When the luteinizing hormone level was slightly increased on the day of trigger, single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer was performed on day 6 after the trigger (ovulation 5.0). In total, 67,018 cycles (ovulation 4.5, 29,705 cycles; ovulation 5.0, 31,995 cycles; hormone replacement, 5318 cycles) of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer between January 2008 and December 2017 at Kato Ladies Clinic were retrospectively analyzed. During the study period, embryo cryopreservation was performed using a vitrification method in all cycles.ResultsHormone replacement cycles were associated with a higher occurrence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio, 2.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-2.81) and placenta accreta (adjusted odds ratio, 4.14; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-10.44) compared with the natural cycle. The risks of cesarean delivery (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.78-2.18), preterm birth (adjusted odds ratio, 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.93), and low birthweight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.73) were also higher for hormone replacement cycles. No significant difference in the risk of congenital anomalies was observed between the 2 cycles.ConclusionThe risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, placenta accreta, cesarean delivery, preterm delivery, and low birthweight was higher in hormone replacement cycles than in natural cycles, whereas the risk of congenital anomalies was similar between both cycles. Further follow-up is needed to investigate these risks and to explore alternative endometrial preparation methods.

Project description:BackgroundLow serum progesterone on the day of frozen embryo transfer (FET) is associated with diminished pregnancy rates in artificial endometrium preparation cycles, but there is no consensus on whether strengthened luteal phase support (LPS) benefits patients with low progesterone on the FET day in artificial cycles. This single-centre, large-sample retrospective trial was designed to investigate the contribution of strengthened LPS to pregnancy outcomes for groups with low progesterone levels on the FET day in artificial endometrium preparation cycles.MethodsWomen who had undergone the first artificial endometrium preparation cycle after a freeze-all protocol in our clinic from 2016 to 2018 were classified into two groups depending on their serum progesterone levels on the FET day. Routine LPS was administered to group B (P ≥ 10.0 ng/ml on the FET day, n = 1261), and strengthened LPS (routine LPS+ im P 40 mg daily) was administered to group A (P < 10.0 ng/ml on the FET day, n = 1295). The primary endpoint was the live birth rate, and the secondary endpoints were clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and neonatal outcomes.ResultsThe results showed that the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower in group A than in group B (48.4% vs 53.2%, adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68, 0.96), whereas miscarriage rates were similar between the two groups (16.0% vs 14.7%, aRR 1.09, 95% CI 0.77, 1.54). The live birth rate was slightly lower in group A than in group B (39.5% vs 43.3%, aRR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70, 1.0). Birthweights and other neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionsThe results indicated that the serum progesterone level on the FET day was one of the risk factors predicting the chances of pregnancy in artificial endometrium preparation cycles, and strengthened LPS in patients with low progesterone on the FET day might help to provide a reasonable pregnancy outcome in artificial cycles, although further prospective evidence is needed to confirm this possibility.

Project description:BackgroupFrozen-thawed embryo transfer is rising worldwide. One adverse effect of programmed frozen embryo transfer (FET) reported in some studies is an increased risk of adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Meanwhile, body mass index (BMI) also has adverse effect on obstetric and perinatal outcomes. In this study, we investigated that the influence of different endometrial preparation protocols on obstetric and perinatal outcomes and the role of BMI in it.MethodThis retrospective cohort study included 2333 singleton deliveries after frozen-thaw embryo transfer at our centre between 2014 and 2021, including 550 cycles with programmed FET, 1783 cycles with true natural cycle FET (tNC-FET). In further analysis according to BMI grouped by Asian criterion, group A (18.5 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 24.00 kg/m2) included 1257 subjects, group B (24 kg/m2 ≤ BMI < 28.00 kg/m2) included 503 subjects and group C (BMI ≥ 28 kg/m2) included 573 subjects. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Binary logistic regression analyses were performed to explore the association between obstetric and perinatal outcomes and endometrial preparation protocols.ResultsThere were no significant differences in the placenta previa, gestational diabetes mellitus(GDM), preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), cesarean section (CS) and macrosomia between the tNC-FET and programmed FET groups (P > 0.05). The programmed FET cycles were associated to a higher risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) compared with the tNC-FET cycles (7.3% vs 4.4%, crude OR 1.71[1.16-2.54]; adjusted OR 1.845[1.03-3.30]). After dividing the patients into three groups according to the BMI, The programmed FET cycles were associated to a higher risk of PIH in group C (14.4% vs 6.2%, crude OR 2.55 [1.42-4.55]; adjusted OR 4.71 [1.77-12.55]) compared with the tNC-FET cycles. But there was no statistically significant difference in group A and group B. Programmed FET group compared with the tNC-FET group, the risk of PIH increase as the body mass index increase.ConclusionThis study showed a tendency toward increasing risk of PIH in programmed FET cycle compared with the tNC-FET cycle, and the risk of PIH increases as BMI increases. Increased risk of preterm birth and low birth weight is linked to increased risk of PIH.