Dataset Information

Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We aimed to determine whether daptomycin plus fosfomycin provides higher treatment success than daptomycin alone for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia and endocarditis.

Methods

A randomized (1:1) phase 3 superiority, open-label, and parallel group clinical trial of adult inpatients with MRSA bacteremia was conducted at 18 Spanish hospitals. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily plus 2 g of fosfomycin intravenously every 6 hours, or 10 mg/kg of daptomycin intravenously daily. Primary endpoint was treatment success 6 weeks after the end of therapy.

Results

Of 167 patients randomized, 155 completed the trial and were assessed for the primary endpoint. Treatment success at 6 weeks after the end of therapy was achieved in 40 of 74 patients who received daptomycin plus fosfomycin and in 34 of 81 patients who were given daptomycin alone (54.1% vs 42.0%; relative risk, 1.29 [95% confidence interval, .93-1.8]; P = .135). At 6 weeks, daptomycin plus fosfomycin was associated with lower microbiologic failure (0 vs 9 patients; P = .003) and lower complicated bacteremia (16.2% vs 32.1%; P = .022). Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in 13 of 74 patients (17.6%) receiving daptomycin plus fosfomycin, and in 4 of 81 patients (4.9%) receiving daptomycin alone (P = .018).

Conclusions

Daptomycin plus fosfomycin provided 12% higher rate of treatment success than daptomycin alone, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. This antibiotic combination prevented microbiological failure and complicated bacteremia, but it was more often associated with adverse events.

Clinical trials registration

NCT01898338.

SUBMITTER: Pujol M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8096235 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Treatment failure occurs in about 25% of patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. We assessed whether cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves better treatment success than cloxacillin alone in hospitalized adults with MSSA bacteremia. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase III-IV superiority randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 2 g of intravenous cloxacillin alone every 4 h or with 3 g of intravenous fosfomycin every 6 h for the initial 7 days. The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 7, a composite endpoint with the following criteria: patient alive, stable or with improved quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, afebrile and with negative blood cultures for MSSA, adjudicated by an independent committee blinded to treatment allocation. We randomized 215 patients, of whom 105 received cloxacillin plus fosfomycin and 110 received cloxacillin alone. We analyzed the primary endpoint with the intention-to-treat approach in 214 patients who received at least 1 day of treatment. Treatment success at day 7 after randomization was achieved in 83 (79.8%) of 104 patients receiving combination treatment versus 82 (74.5%) of 110 patients receiving monotherapy (risk difference 5.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.95-16.48). Secondary endpoints, including mortality and adverse events, were similar in the two groups except for persistent bacteremia at day 3, which was less common in the combination arm. In a prespecified interim analysis, the independent committee recommended stopping recruitment for futility prior to meeting the planned randomization of 366 patients. Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin did not achieve better treatment success at day 7 of therapy than cloxacillin alone in MSSA bacteremia. Further trials should consider the intrinsic heterogeneity of the infection by using a more personalized approach. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03959345 .

Project description:Elasnin is a recently reported antibiofilm agent that is effective against Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Remarkably, we observed that elasnin has a superior activity in eradicating daptomycin-resistant MRSA strain biofilm, with a lower minimum biofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) value of 0.625 μg/mL, compared to 2.5 μg/mL for the wild type. Confocal microscopy further confirmed the higher biofilm eradication on the daptomycin-resistant strain, displaying ∼53% decrease in cell density upon elasnin treatment, while the wild-type strain was only decreased by ∼15%. Quantitative proteomics revealed that the daptomycin-resistant strain has a lower expression of the membrane, cell wall, and extracellular proteins, and also proteins involved in the arginine biosynthesis, pathogenesis, and cell adhesion compared to the wild type, which may result in weaker biofilm development. This study highlights the potential clinical application of elasnin through its superior biofilm eradication activity against a daptomycin-resistant MRSA strain, and revealed the associated processes governing this superior activity through proteomics analysis. IMPORTANCE Due to the increased use of daptomycin for the treatment of MRSA infections, the emergence of daptomycin-resistant strains has become prevalent in recent years. In this study, we discovered that elasnin, a newly reported antibiofilm compound, has a superior activity in eradicating daptomycin-resistant MRSA strain biofilms compared to the wild type. Follow-up analysis revealed the reason behind this superior activity, which is the lower expression of key proteins that play a role in pathogenesis and cell adhesion in the daptomycin-resistant strain, leading to weaker biofilm development. This showcases the potential use of elasnin in clinical settings where daptomycin-resistant strains and biofilm formation are prevalent. Altogether, our study provides new insights into the mechanism of elasnin in MRSA biofilm cells and identified its superior biofilm eradicating activity in the daptomycin-resistant strain.