Dataset Information

Association of Adherence to Surfactant Best Practice Uses With Clinical Outcomes Among Neonates in Sweden.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

While surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) in preterm infants has been evaluated in clinical trials, less is known about how surfactant is used outside such a framework.

Objective

To evaluate registered use, off-label use, and omissions of surfactant treatment by gestational age (GA) and associations with outcomes, mainly among very preterm infants (GA <32 weeks).

Design, setting, and participants

This population-based cohort study used registry data for 97 377 infants born in Sweden between 2009 and 2018. Infants did not have malformations and were admitted for neonatal care. Data analysis was conducted from June 2019 to June 2020.

Exposures

Timing and number of surfactant administrations, off-label use, and omission of use. Registered use was defined by drug label (1-3 administrations for RDS). Omissions were defined as surfactant not administered despite mechanical ventilation for RDS.

Main outcome and measures

In-hospital survival, pneumothorax, intraventricular hemorrhage grade 3 to 4, duration of mechanical ventilation, use of postnatal systemic corticosteroids for lung disease, treatment with supplemental oxygen at 28 days' postnatal age and at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and adjusted for any prenatal corticosteroid treatment, cesarean delivery, GA, infant sex, Apgar score at 10 minutes, and birth weight z score of less than -2.

Results

In total, 7980 surfactant administrations were given to 5209 infants (2233 [42.9%] girls; 2976 [57.1%] boys): 629 (12.1%) born at full term, 691 (13.3%) at 32 to 36 weeks' GA, 1544 (29.6%) at 28 to 31 weeks' GA, and 2345 (45.0%) at less than 28 weeks' GA. Overall, 977 infants (18.8%) received off-label use. In 1364 of 3508 infants (38.9%) with GA of 22 to 31 weeks, the first administration of surfactant was given more than 2 hours after birth, and this was associated with higher odds of pneumothorax (adjusted OR [aOR], 2.59; 95% CI, 1.76-3.83), intraventricular hemorrhage grades 3 to 4 (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.23-2.39), receipt of postnatal corticosteroids (aOR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.22-2.03), and longer duration of assisted ventilation (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04-1.72) but also higher survival (aOR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.10-1.91) than among infants treated within 2 hours of birth. In 146 infants (2.8%), the recommended maximum of 3 surfactant administrations was exceeded but without associated improvements in outcome. Omission of surfactant treatment occurred in 203 of 3551 infants (5.7%) who were receiving mechanical ventilation and was associated with lower survival (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.30-0.82). In full-term infants, 336 (53.4%) of those receiving surfactant had a diagnosis of meconium aspiration syndrome. Surfactant for meconium aspiration was not associated with improved neonatal outcomes.

Conclusions and relevance

In this study, adherence to best practices and labels for surfactant use in newborn infants varied, with important clinical implications for neonatal outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Challis P

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8100866 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceClinical practice group performance on quality measures associated with chronic disease management has become central to reimbursement. Therefore, it is important to determine whether commonly used process and disease control measures for chronic conditions correlate with utilization-based outcomes, as they do in acute disease.ObjectiveTo examine the associations among clinical practice group performance on diabetes quality measures, including process measures, disease control measures, and utilization-based outcomes.Design, setting, and participantsThis retrospective, cross-sectional analysis examined commercial claims data from a national health insurance plan. A cohort of eligible beneficiaries with diabetes aged 18 to 65 years who were enrolled for at least 12 months from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2014, was defined. Eligible beneficiaries were attributed to a clinical practice group based on the plurality of their primary care or endocrinology office visits. Data were analyzed from October 1, 2018, through April 30, 2019.Main outcomes and measuresFor each clinical practice group, performance on current diabetes quality measures included 3 process measures (2 testing measures [hemoglobin A1c {HbA1c} and low-density lipoprotein {LDL} testing] and 1 drug use measure [statin use]) and 2 disease control measures (HbA1c <8% and LDL level <100 mg/dL). The rates of utilization-based outcomes, including hospitalization for diabetes and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), were also measured.ResultsIn this cohort of 652 258 beneficiaries with diabetes from 886 clinical practice groups, 42.9% were aged 51 to 60 years, and 52.6% were men. Beneficiaries lived in areas that were predominantly white (68.1%). At the clinical practice group level, except for high correlation between the 2 testing measures, correlations among different quality measures were weak (r range, 0.010-0.244). Rate of HbA1c of less than 8% had the strongest correlation with hospitalization for MACE (r = -0.046; P = .03) and diabetes (r = -0.109; P < .001). Rates of HbA1c control at the clinical practice group level were not significantly associated with likelihood of hospitalization at the individual level. Performance on the process and disease control measures together explained 3.9% of the variation in the likelihood of hospitalization for a MACE or diabetes at the individual level.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, performance on utilization-based measures-intended to reflect the quality of chronic disease management-was only weakly associated with direct measures of chronic disease management, namely, disease control measures. This correlation should be considered when determining the degree of financial emphasis to place on hospitalization rates as a measure of quality in treatment of chronic diseases.

Project description:BackgroundChronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is associated with poor long-term outcomes. Although prompt revascularization is recommended, the optimal revascularization strategy remains uncertain. The BEST-CLI trial compared endovascular and open surgical revascularization for CLTI, but the generalizability of this study to the clinical population with CLTI has not been evaluated.MethodsWe included Medicare beneficiaries aged 65-85 years with CLTI who underwent revascularization and would be eligible for enrollment in BEST-CLI between 2016 and 2019. The primary exposure was type of revascularization (endovascular vs autologous graft [cohort 1] vs nonautologous graft [cohort 2]), and the primary outcome was a composite of major adverse limb events (MALE) and death. MALE included above-ankle amputation and major intervention, which was defined as new bypass of index limb, thrombectomy, or thrombolysis.ResultsA total of 66,153 patients were included in this study (10,125 autologous grafts; 7867 nonautologous grafts; 48,161 endovascular). Compared with those enrolled in BEST-CLI cohort 1, patients in this study were older (mean age, 73.5 ± 5.7 vs 69.9 ± 9.9 years), more likely to be female (38.3% [22,340/58,286] vs 28.5% [408/1434]), and presented with more comorbidities. Endovascular operators for the study population vs BEST-CLI cohort 1 were less likely to be surgeons (55.9% [26,924/48,148] vs 73.0% [520/708]) and more likely to be cardiologists (25.5% [5900/48,148] vs 14.5% [103/78]). When assessing long-term outcomes, the crude risk of death or MALE in this cohort was higher with surgery (56.6% autologous grafts vs 42.6% BEST-CLI cohort 1 at a median of follow-up 2.7 years; 51.6% nonautologous grafts vs 42.8% BEST-CLI cohort 2 at a median follow-up of 1.6 years) but similar with the endovascular cohort (58.7% Medicare vs 57.4% cohort 1 at 2.7 years; 47.0% Medicare vs 47.7% cohort 2 at 1.6 years). Of those who received endovascular treatment, the risk of incident major intervention was less than half in this cohort compared with the trial cohort (10.0% Medicare vs 23.5% cohort 1 at 2.7 years; 8.6% Medicare vs 25.6% cohort 2 at 1.6 years), although technical endovascular failures were not captured.ConclusionsThese results suggest that the findings of the BEST-CLI trial may not be applicable to the entirety of the Medicare population of patients with CLTI undergoing revascularization.