Dataset Information

Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes Associated With Hyperkalemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Hospital-Based Cohort Study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To examine the association between hyperkalemia and long-term cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Patients and methods

An observational retrospective cohort study was performed using a Japanese hospital claims registry, Medical Data Vision (April 1, 2008, to September 30, 2018). Of 1,208,894 patients with at least 1 potassium measurement, 167,465 patients with chronic kidney disease were selected based on International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Hyperkalemia was defined as at least 2 potassium measurements of 5.1 mmol/L or greater within 12 months. Normokalemic controls were patients without a record of potassium levels of 5.1 mmol/L or greater and 3.5 mmol/L or less. Changes in eGFRs and hazard ratios of death, hospitalization for cardiac events, heart failure, and renal replacement therapy introduction were assessed between propensity score-matched hyperkalemic patients and normokalemic controls.

Results

Of 16,133 hyperkalemic patients and 11,898 normokalemic controls eligible for analyses, 5859 (36.3%) patients and 5859 (49.2%) controls were selected after propensity score matching. The mean follow-up period was 3.5 years. The 3-year eGFR change in patients and controls was -5.75 and -1.79 mL/min/1.73 m², respectively. Overall, hyperkalemic patients had higher risks for death, hospitalization for cardiac events, heart failure, and renal replacement therapy introduction than controls, with hazard ratios of 4.40 (95% CI, 3.74 to 5.18), 1.95 (95% CI, 1.59 to 2.39), 5.09 (95% CI, 4.17 to 6.21), and 7.54 (95% CI, 5.73 to 9.91), respectively.

Conclusion

Hyperkalemia was associated with significant risks for mortality and adverse clinical outcomes, with more rapid decline of renal function. These findings underscore the significance of hyperkalemia as a predisposition to future adverse events in patients with chronic kidney disease.

SUBMITTER: Kohsaka S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8105529 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Rationale & objectiveThe clinical significance of isolated diastolic hypertension in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear. We assessed the prevalence of isolated diastolic hypertension and its association with adverse kidney and cardiovascular outcomes in participants in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort (CRIC) study.Study designProspective cohort study.Setting & populationCRIC study participants with complete baseline data on systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) (N=5,621).ExposureIsolated diastolic hypertension defined as SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg and DBP >80 mm Hg.Reference groupNormotension, defined as SBP ≤ 130 mm Hg and DBP ≤ 80 mm Hg.OutcomesComposite kidney events (50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate or onset of kidney failure), composite cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease), and all-cause mortality.Analytical approachCox proportional hazards models adjusted for demographic, health behavior, and clinical covariates.ResultsOf the 5,621 participants, 347 (6.2%) had isolated diastolic hypertension. Among the 347 participants with isolated diastolic hypertension, there was no association between isolated diastolic hypertension and the composite kidney outcome (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.93-1.47; P = 0.18), composite cardiovascular events (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.65-1.27; P = 0.58), or all-cause mortality (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.57-1.19; P = 0.30).LimitationsOlder age of cohort and low number of participants of Asian ethnicity limit generalizability of findings. A relatively small sample size is inadequate to detect modest associations with outcomes.ConclusionsIsolated diastolic hypertension was not associated with the risk of adverse kidney and cardiovascular events in participants with CKD.Plain language summaryClinicians frequently encounter patients with kidney disease who have controlled systolic blood pressure (BP) but high diastolic BP and do not know whether they should intensify BP treatment in an attempt to control the diastolic BP. We examined whether having controlled systolic BP but uncontrolled diastolic BP leads to worse heart and kidney outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease. We did not find any such association. However, our study was relatively small and had a number of limitations. Till larger studies confirm or refute this finding, we recommend not increasing blood pressure medications to improve the diastolic BP control if the systolic BP is already well controlled in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Project description:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:In patients with CKD, elevated plasma parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels are associated with greater cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. However, the reference method for PTH measurement is disputed. It has been argued that measurement of nonoxidized PTH better reflects biologically active PTH than measurements with conventional assays. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS:PTH and nonoxidized PTH levels were measured at study baseline in 535 patients with CKD with an eGFR range between 89 and 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Patients were followed over 5.1 years for the occurrence of acute heart failure, atherosclerotic events, CKD progression (doubling of serum creatinine or initiation of RRT), or all-cause death. RESULTS:Atherosclerotic events, acute heart failure, CKD progression, and deaths from any cause occurred in 116, 58, 73, and 85 patients, respectively. In Kaplan-Meier analyses, patients at the highest PTH and nonoxidized-PTH tertile (79-543 and 12-172 pg/ml, respectively) showed a higher rate of atherosclerotic events, acute heart failure, CKD progression, and death from any cause. After adjustment for eGFR and albuminuria, nonoxidized PTH was no longer associated with atherosclerotic events (hazard ratio third versus first tertile, 1.04 [95% confidence intervals, 0.62-1.75]), acute heart failure (hazard ratio third versus first tertile, 1.24 [95% confidence intervals, 0.59-2.62]), CKD progression (hazard ratio third versus first tertile, 0.93 [95% confidence intervals, 0.46-1.90]), and death from any cause (hazard ratio third versus first tertile, 1.23 [95% confidence intervals, 0.66-2.31]), and PTH lost its association with atherosclerotic events (hazard ratio third versus first tertile, 0.80 [95% confidence intervals, 0.46-1.38]) and CKD progression (hazard ratio third versus first tertile, 0.99 [95% confidence intervals, 0.46-2.10]), although it remained associated with acute heart failure (hazard ratio third versus first tertile, 2.76 [95% confidence intervals, 1.11-6.89]) and all-cause death (hazard ratio third versus first tertile, 2.35 [95% confidence intervals, 1.13-4.89]). After further adjustment for cardiovascular and kidney risk factors, PTH remained associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio third versus first tertile, 2.79 [95% confidence intervals, 1.32-5.89]), but with no other end point. CONCLUSIONS:In a cohort of patients with CKD, PTH was associated with all-cause mortality; there was no association of nonoxidized PTH with any of the clinical outcomes examined.