Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

10 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

A randomized trial of safety and pharmacodynamic interactions between a selective glucocorticoid receptor antagonist, PT150, and ethanol in healthy volunteers.

ABSTRACT: PT150, a novel competitive glucocorticoid receptor (GR) antagonist, has proven safe in animal models, healthy volunteers, and people with depression. Our study is the first to investigate PT150's safety with alcohol use. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate pharmacodynamic interactions between ethanol and PT150 in healthy subjects. This single-site, Phase I pilot trial consisted of community-recruited, healthy, alcohol-experienced participants aged 21-64 years. Of 32 participants screened, 11 were enrolled and randomized, one of which withdrew before intervention. PT150 (900 mg/day) was administered orally to all participants for five days. All participants received two beverage challenges on Day 1 (before PT150 administration) and Day 5 (after PT150 administration). On challenge days, they received both alcohol (16% ethanol) and placebo (1% ethanol) beverages in random order. Primary outcomes included breath alcohol level, blood pressure, heart rate, adverse events, and electrocardiogram changes. There were no statistically significant differences in vital signs or estimated blood alcohol concentrations between PT150 non-exposed and exposed groups during the ethanol challenge. There were no clinically significant abnormal electrocardiograms or serious adverse events. These data show that administration of PT150 with concurrent alcohol use is safe and well-tolerated. This study supports a future pharmacokinetic interaction study between PT150 and alcohol.Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03548714.

SUBMITTER: Morice C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8111026 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Pharmacodynamic interactions of a solid formulation of sodium oxybate and ethanol in healthy volunteers.

Project description:AimThe pharmacologic effects of sodium oxybate (SO) have a number of similarities with those of alcohol. This study evaluated the pharmacodynamic interaction of SMO.IR (a solid immediate release formulation of SO) and alcohol (0.7 (males) or 0.57 (females) g kg(-1) alcohol using 40% vodka).MethodsIn a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover trial, 24 healthy volunteers received randomly a) 2.25 g SMO.IR and placebo alcohol preparation, b) 2.25 g f SMO.IR and alcohol, c) 2.25 g SMO.IR matching placebo and alcohol and d) 2.25 g of SMO.IR matching placebo and placebo alcohol preparation. Objective and subjective cognitive parameters, adverse events and vital signs were assessed before, 15 and 165 min after treatment administration.ResultsAlcohol produced the expected cognitive impairment and the expected subjective sedation rapidly after intake (from 15 min). The objective effects of SMO.IR were much less pronounced than those of alcohol. The reverse was observed for subjective complaints, which were related to lesser stimulation and greater sedation. Nevertheless, 165 min after administration this sedation feeling was less with SMO.IR than with alcohol. There was a significant interaction between SMO.IR and alcohol at 15 min (i.e. increase in alertness and stimulation and decrease in sedation). In addition, an isolated mild decrease in digit vigilance accuracy occurred at 165 min post-dose after the combination. The co-administration of SMO.IR and alcohol was safe and well-tolerated.ConclusionSMO.IR and alcohol have distinct adverse effect profiles. The objective effects of SMO.IR are much less marked than those of alcohol. No deleterious interaction was observed.

| S-EPMC4574833 | biostudies-literature

Pharmacokinetic, partial pharmacodynamic and initial safety analysis of (-)-epicatechin in healthy volunteers.

Project description:(-)-Epicatechin ((-)-EPI), a naturally occurring flavanol, has emerged as a likely candidate for cocoa-based product reported reductions in cardiometabolic risk. The present study aimed to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of purified (-)-EPI administered to healthy volunteers. In this phase I, open-label, two-part single- and multiple-dose study, subjects received either a single dose (n = 9) of 50, 100 or 200 mg or multiple doses (n = 8) of 50 mg daily (q.d.) or twice daily (b.i.d) for 5 days. Blood was collected at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 6 h after (-)-EPI administration in the single and multiple dose groups (blood collection repeated in day 5). Samples were analyzed by HPLC-HR-ESI-MS for EPI and metabolite quantification. In the q.d. and b.i.d. groups, blood samples were analyzed for NO surrogates and follistatin levels as well as, platelet mitochondrial complexes I, V and citrate synthase activity levels. (-)-EPI was well tolerated and readily absorbed with further phase 2 metabolism. On day 5, in the q.d. and b.i.d. groups, there were significant increases in plasma nitrite of 30% and 17%, respectively. In the q.d. group on day 5 vs. day 1, platelet mitochondrial complexes I, IV and citrate synthase activities demonstrated a significant increase of ?92, 62 and 8%, respectively. Average day 5 follistatin AUC levels were ?2.5 fold higher vs. day 1 AUC levels in the b.i.d. group. (-)-EPI was safe to use, with no observed adverse effects, and our findings suggest that increases in NO metabolites, mitochondrial enzyme function and plasma follistatin levels may underlie some of the beneficial effects of cocoa products or (-)-EPI as reported in other studies.

| S-EPMC4357542 | biostudies-literature

Phase 1 Studies to Define the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profiles of the Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Apararenone in Healthy Volunteers.

Project description:Apararenone is a long-acting, nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of single- and multiple-dose apararenone were assessed in 3 phase 1 randomized, double-blind studies in 223 healthy adults. Study 1 assessed the PK, safety/tolerability, and PD of single-dose apararenone (3.75-640 mg) and multiple-dose apararenone (10-40 mg/day on days 1-14, 320 mg loading dose on day 1 + 10 mg/day on days 2-14, or 40-320 mg loading dose on day 1 + 2.5-20 mg/day on days 2-14) in Caucasian and Black men and women. Study 2 assessed the PK and safety of single-dose apararenone (5-320 mg) in healthy Japanese men. Study 3 assessed the PK, PD, and safety/tolerability of single-dose apararenone (160 or 640 mg) or eplerenone (200 mg; only for 160 mg of apararenone), each after fludrocortisone challenge in Caucasian men. In studies 1 and 2, an approximately dose-proportional increase was observed in PK parameters over the apararenone dose range of 3.75-40 mg; at higher doses, a less than dose-proportional increase was observed. Food, sex, age, and race had no apparent effect on apararenone PK. A long half-life was seen for apararenone and its principal metabolite; in addition, the exposure of the metabolite was lower than that of apararenone. Apararenone suppressed the decrease in urinary sodium and potassium ion ratio that occurs after loading with fludrocortisone. These studies support the mechanism of action of apararenone as an MRA, and further clinical development is warranted.

| S-EPMC8048531 | biostudies-literature

Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions between cilnidipine and valsartan, in healthy volunteers.

Project description:Although cilnidipine and valsartan are widely coadministered to patients with hypertension, their drug-drug interaction potential has not been investigated. This study compared the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), and tolerability profiles of cilnidipine and valsartan, both alone and in combination, in healthy male subjects.Fifty-four subjects, enrolled into an open-label, single-dose, three-treatment, three-period crossover study, randomly received cilnidipine (10 mg), valsartan (160 mg), or both according to one of six sequences. Blood samples were collected at baseline and up to 24 hours after drug administration in each period. Plasma concentrations of cilnidipine and valsartan were determined by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to the last measurable time (AUC(last)) were estimated using a noncompartmental method. Tolerability was evaluated by assessing adverse events (AEs), vital signs, electrocardiograms, and clinical laboratory tests. Blood pressure was also measured for PD assessment.A total of 51 subjects completed the study. The PK profile of cilnidipine was not significantly affected by coadministered valsartan; the geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence interval (90% CI) of AUC(last) for cilnidipine with and without valsartan was 1.04 (0.98-1.10). Likewise, cilnidipine did not affect the PK of valsartan; the geometric mean ratio (90% CI) of AUC(last) for valsartan with and without cilnidipine was 0.94 (0.83-1.07). Coadministration of cilnidipine and valsartan reduced blood pressure in an additive way. No serious AEs were reported, and both cilnidipine and valsartan were well tolerated.Coadministered cilnidipine and valsartan do not cause a significant PK or PD interaction, and they are well tolerated.

| S-EPMC4199974 | biostudies-literature

Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Safety Profile of a Novel Anti-CD28 Domain Antibody Antagonist in Healthy Subjects.

Project description:We report pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of a novel anti-CD28 domain antibody antagonist (lulizumab pegol) in healthy subjects following single- or multiple-dose administration. A minimal anticipated biological effect level approach was used to select a 0.01 mg starting dose for a single-ascending-dose (SAD), double-blind, first-in-human study. Part 1 included 9 intravenous (IV; 0.01-100 mg) and 3 subcutaneous (SC; 9-50 mg) doses or placebo. In part 2, a keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) immunization was performed in 16 subjects/panel, who received 1 of 3 IV doses (9-100 mg) or placebo. In a double-blind, multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) study, subjects received SC lulizumab 6.25 mg every 2 weeks, 12.5 mg weekly, 37.5 mg weekly, or placebo. Among 180 treated subjects, 169 completed the studies. Peak concentrations and areas under the curve from time 0 to infinity increased dose proportionally. Estimated SC bioavailability was 68.2%. Receptor occupancy of approximately ≥80% was maintained for ≥2 weeks at ≥9-mg doses (SAD) and throughout the dosing interval (MAD). IV doses ≥9 mg inhibited antibody production against KLH for 2 weeks. No significant cytokine or immune cell changes were observed. No immunogenicity responses persisted, and there was no correlation to adverse events. Headache occurred in 21 SAD and 4 MAD subjects receiving lulizumab; in the MAD study 5 lulizumab subjects experienced infections. Lulizumab IV or SC was safe at all doses studied, without evidence of cytokine release.

| S-EPMC5697635 | biostudies-literature

Effects of the TRPV1 antagonist ABT-102 on body temperature in healthy volunteers: pharmacokinetic/ pharmacodynamic analysis of three phase 1 trials.

Project description:AimTo characterize quantitatively the relationship between ABT-102, a potent and selective TRPV1 antagonist, exposure and its effects on body temperature in humans using a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling approach.MethodsSerial pharmacokinetic and body temperature (oral or core) measurements from three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled studies [single dose (2, 6, 18, 30 and 40?mg, solution formulation), multiple dose (2, 4 and 8?mg twice daily for 7?days, solution formulation) and multiple-dose (1, 2 and 4?mg twice daily for 7?days, solid dispersion formulation)] were analyzed. NONMEM was used for model development and the model building steps were guided by pre-specified diagnostic and statistical criteria. The final model was qualified using non-parametric bootstrap and visual predictive check.ResultsThe developed body temperature model included additive components of baseline, circadian rhythm (cosine function of time) and ABT-102 effect (Emax function of plasma concentration) with tolerance development (decrease in ABT-102 Emax over time). Type of body temperature measurement (oral vs. core) was included as a fixed effect on baseline, amplitude of circadian rhythm and residual error. The model estimates (95% bootstrap confidence interval) were: baseline oral body temperature, 36.3 (36.3, 36.4)°C; baseline core body temperature, 37.0 (37.0, 37.1)°C; oral circadian amplitude, 0.25 (0.22, 0.28)°C; core circadian amplitude, 0.31 (0.28, 0.34)°C; circadian phase shift, 7.6 (7.3, 7.9) h; ABT-102 Emax , 2.2 (1.9, 2.7)°C; ABT-102 EC50 , 20 (15, 28) ng?ml(-1) ; tolerance T50 , 28 (20, 43) h.ConclusionsAt exposures predicted to exert analgesic activity in humans, the effect of ABT-102 on body temperature is estimated to be 0.6 to 0.8°C. This effect attenuates within 2 to 3?days of dosing.

| S-EPMC3612721 | biostudies-literature

Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Interaction Profile of Vericiguat: Results from Three Randomized Phase I Studies in Healthy Volunteers.

Project description:BackgroundVericiguat, a direct stimulator of soluble guanylate cyclase, has been developed as a first-in-class therapy for symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) and ejection fraction < 45%.MethodsSafety, pharmacodynamic (PD), and pharmacokinetic (PK) interactions between vericiguat and drugs used in HF (sacubitril/valsartan [SV] and aspirin [acetylsalicylic acid]) or with a narrow therapeutic index (warfarin) were evaluated in three phase I studies.ResultsVericiguat 15 mg (single dose [SD]) had no effect on bleeding time or platelet aggregation when coadministered with aspirin 1000 mg versus aspirin alone: estimated differences in least squares means 2.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] - 90.4 to 95.8) and 2.4% (95% CI - 7.0 to 11.8) turbidimetry, respectively. Vericiguat 10 mg (once daily) had no effect on coagulation inhibition elicited by warfarin 25 mg (SD; mean ratios of area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to 96 h for clotting parameter treatment comparisons approximated 100.0%). There were no clinically relevant PD changes whether SV 97/103 mg was administered with single or multiple doses of vericiguat 2.5 mg or placebo (differences in systolic blood pressure [BP] - 1.66 mmHg [90% CI - 4.22 to 0.90]; diastolic BP - 1.80 mmHg [90% CI - 3.24 to - 0.36]; heart rate - 0.33 beats/min [90% CI - 2.25 to 1.60]). Vericiguat demonstrated no PK interactions when coadministered with aspirin, warfarin, or SV at steady state. Treatments were well tolerated.ConclusionsCoadministration of vericiguat with SV, aspirin, or warfarin was well tolerated. No clinically relevant PD or PK interactions were observed, supporting concomitant use of these drugs, commonly used by patients with HF, with vericiguat and no dose adjustment.Eudract number2014-000765-52; 2014-004880-19; 2015-004809-16.

| S-EPMC7932970 | biostudies-literature

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Fevipiprant (QAW039), a Novel CRTh2 Receptor Antagonist: Results From 2 Randomized, Phase 1, Placebo-Controlled Studies in Healthy Volunteers.

Project description:We evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of a novel oral CRTh2 antagonist, fevipiprant (QAW039), in healthy subjects. Peak concentrations of fevipiprant in plasma were observed 1-3 hours postdosing. Concentrations declined in a multiexponential manner, followed by an apparent terminal phase (t1/2 , ∼20 hours). Steady state was achieved in 4 days with <2-fold accumulation. Elimination was partly by renal excretion (≤30% of the dose) and glucuronidation. Food had minimal impact on the PK of fevipiprant, and it was well tolerated at single and multiple oral doses up to 500 mg/day. No dose-dependent adverse events were observed, and all the events were mild or moderate in severity. Systemic concentrations were sufficiently high to achieve relevant target occupancy, considering in vitro pharmacology data. In summary, the data support further development as a once-daily oral therapy for allergic diseases.

| S-EPMC5071756 | biostudies-literature

Pharmacokinetics of the Oral Selective CXCR2 Antagonist AZD5069: A Summary of Eight Phase I Studies in Healthy Volunteers.

Project description:ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to summarise the pharmacokinetic findings from eight phase I studies in healthy volunteers given oral AZD5069, a selective small-molecule CXCR2 antagonist.Methods240 healthy volunteers across eight phase I studies received single (0.1-200 mg) or multiple once- or twice-daily (10-120 mg) oral AZD5069 as solution, suspension, capsules or tablets. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated using non-compartmental analysis methods.ResultsAZD5069 was rapidly absorbed (time to maximum concentration ~ 2 h) under fasting conditions. A high-fat, high-calorie meal delayed and reduced the peak plasma AZD5069 concentration (Cmax) by 50%, but total exposure (AUC) was unchanged (fed:fasting geometric mean ratio 90% confidence interval within 0.80-1.25). The plasma concentration of AZD5069 declined with an initial half-life of 4 h and terminal half-life of 11 h. Steady-state plasma concentrations were achieved within 2-3 days and accumulation was ~ 1.1-fold with twice-daily dosing. Systemic exposure was approximately proportional to dose. Intra- and inter-subject variability in AUC was 3-11 and 29-64%, respectively. Less than 5% of the AZD5069 dose was excreted as parent drug in the urine. Elderly subjects had 39% higher AZD5069 AUC and 21% higher Cmax than younger adults. Japanese subjects had similar or slightly higher exposure to AZD5069 than Caucasian subjects. Co-administration with ketoconazole resulted in 2.1-fold higher AUC and 1.6-fold higher Cmax. All formulations had similar bioavailability.ConclusionsAZD5069 demonstrated predictive linear pharmacokinetics with low intra- and moderate inter-subject variability and no major influences from ethnicity, age, food or formulation. Half-life data indicated suitability for twice-daily dosing. CLINICALTRIALS.Gov identifiersNCT00953888, NCT01051505, NCT01083238, NCT01100047, NCT01332903, NCT01480739, NCT01735240, NCT01989520.

| S-EPMC5995788 | biostudies-literature

A randomized, crossover pharmacodynamic study of immediate-release omeprazole/sodium bicarbonate and delayed-release lansoprazole in healthy adult volunteers.

Project description:Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) effectively block gastric acid secretion and are the treatment of choice for heartburn. PPIs differ, however, in onset of action and bioavailability. In this single-center, open-label, three-way crossover study, onset of action of immediate-release omeprazole 20 mg/sodium bicarbonate 1100 mg (IR-OME) and delayed-release (DR) lansoprazole 15 mg was evaluated in 63 healthy fasting adults. Subjects were randomized to once daily IR-OME, or DR-lansoprazole, or no treatment for 7 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the earliest time where a statistically significant difference was observed between IR-OME and DR-lansoprazole in median intragastric pH scores for three consecutive 5-min intervals on day 7. Secondary endpoints compared effects of active treatments on days 1 and 7 (e.g., time to sustained inhibition, percentage of time with pH >4). A significant difference in median intragastric pH favoring IR-OME was observed on day 7 starting at the 10- to 15-min interval postdosing (P = 0.024) and sustaining through the 115- to 120-min interval (P = 0.017). On day 1, IR-OME achieved sustained inhibition of intragastric acidity significantly faster than DR-lansoprazole. IR-OME maintained pH >4 significantly longer than DR-lansoprazole over a 24-h period (P = 0.007) on day 7. Overall, results of this study demonstrate IR-OME is safe and well tolerated and that treatment with IR-OME results in significantly faster onset of action and better gastric acid suppression at steady state than DR-lansoprazole.

| S-EPMC4876147 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data