Dataset Information

A DNA Repair and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Signature in Pediatric High-Grade Gliomas: Prognostic and Therapeutic Value.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGGs) are the leading cause of mortality in pediatric neuro-oncology, displaying frequent resistance to standard therapies. Profiling DNA repair and cell cycle gene expression has recently been proposed as a strategy to classify adult glioblastomas. To improve our understanding of the DNA damage response pathways that operate in pHGGs and the vulnerabilities that these pathways might expose, we sought to identify and characterize a specific DNA repair and cell-cycle gene expression signature of pHGGs.

Methods

Transcriptomic analyses were performed to identify a DNA repair and cell-cycle gene expression signature able to discriminate pHGGs (n = 6) from low-grade gliomas (n = 10). This signature was compared to related signatures already established. We used the pHGG signature to explore already transcriptomic datasets of DIPGs and sus-tentorial pHGGs. Finally, we examined the expression of key proteins of the pHGG signature in 21 pHGG diagnostic samples and nine paired relapses. Functional inhibition of one DNA repair factor was carried out in four patients who derived H3.3 K27M mutant cell lines.

Results

We identified a 28-gene expression signature of DNA repair and cell cycle that clustered pHGGs cohorts, in particular sus-tentorial locations, in two groups. Differential protein expression levels of PARP1 and XRCC1 were associated to TP53 mutations and TOP2A amplification and linked significantly to the more radioresistant pHGGs displaying the worst outcome. Using patient-derived cell lines, we showed that the PARP-1/XRCC1 expression balance might be correlated with resistance to PARP1 inhibition.

Conclusion

We provide evidence that PARP1 overexpression, associated to XRCC1 expression, TP53 mutations, and TOP2A amplification, is a new theranostic and potential therapeutic target.

SUBMITTER: Entz-Werle N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8125831 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAs a common primary intracranial tumor, the diagnosis and therapy of low-grade glioma (LGG) remains a pivotal barrier. Cuproptosis, a new way induces cell death, has attracted worldwide attention. However, the relationship between cuproptosis and LGG remains unknown. Our study is all about finding out if there are any genes related to coproptosis that can be used to predict the outcome of LGG.MethodsRNA data and clinical information were selected from Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) datasets and the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), 5 lncRNAs (GAS5.AS1, MYLK.AS1, AC142472.1, AC011346.1, AL359643.3) were identified by Cox univariate and multivariate regression, as well as LASSO Cox regression. In the training and test sets, a dual validation of the predictive signature comprised of these 5 lncRNAs was undertaken. The findings demonstrate that the risk model is able to predict the survival regression of LGG patients and has a good performance in either the KM curve approach or the ROC curve. GO, GSEA and KEGG were carried out to explore the possible molecular processes that affecting the prognosis of LGG. The characteristics of immune microenvironment were investigated by using CIBERSORT, ESTIMATE and ssGSEA.ResultsWe identified five lncRNAs related with cuproptosis that were closely associated with the prognosis of LGG and used these five lncRNAs to develop a risk model. Using this risk model, LGG patients were then divided into high-risk and low-risk groups. The two patient groups had significantly distinct survival characteristics. Analyses of Gene Ontology (GO) and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) revealed that the differential genes of the two patient groups were primarily concentrated in neural active ligand-receptor interaction and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction. The ssGSEA score determined the information related to immune infiltration, and the two groups were differentially expressed in immune subpopulations such as T cells and B cells as well.ConclusionOur study discovered 5 cuproptosis-related lncRNAs which contribute to predicting patients' survival of LGG and provide ideas for the exploration of new targets for LGG in the future.

Project description:BackgroundWhile molecular insights to diffuse lower-grade glioma (dLGG) have improved the basis for prognostication, most established clinical prognostic factors come from the pre-molecular era. For instance, WHO grade as a predictor for survival in dLGG with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation has recently been questioned. We studied the prognostic role of WHO grade in molecularly defined subgroups and evaluated earlier used prognostic factors in the current molecular setting.Material and methodsA total of 253 adults with morphological dLGG, consecutively included between 2007 and 2018, were assessed. IDH mutations, codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p/19q, and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) deletions were analyzed.ResultsThere was no survival benefit for patients with WHO grade 2 over grade 3 IDH-mut dLGG after exclusion of tumors with known CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion (n=157) (log-rank p=0.97). This was true also after stratification for oncological postoperative treatment and when astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas were analyzed separately. In IDH-mut astrocytomas, residual tumor volume after surgery was an independent prognostic factor for survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.01-1.03; p=0.003), but not in oligodendrogliomas (HR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.03; p=0.15). Preoperative tumor size was an independent predictor in both astrocytomas (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.00-1.05; p=0.02) and oligodendrogliomas (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; p=0.01). Age was not a significant prognostic factor in multivariable analyses (astrocytomas p=0.64, oligodendrogliomas p=0.08).ConclusionOur findings suggest that WHO grade is not a robust prognostic factor in molecularly well-defined dLGG. Preoperative tumor size remained a prognostic factor in both IDH-mut astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas in our cohort, whereas residual tumor volume predicted prognosis in IDH-mut astrocytomas only. The age cutoffs for determining high risk in patients with IDH-mut dLGG from the pre-molecular era are not supported by our results.