Dataset Information

Genomic features of rapid versus late relapse in triple negative breast cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease and we have previously shown that rapid relapse of TNBC is associated with distinct sociodemographic features. We hypothesized that rapid versus late relapse in TNBC is also defined by distinct clinical and genomic features of primary tumors.

Methods

Using three publicly-available datasets, we identified 453 patients diagnosed with primary TNBC with adequate follow-up to be characterized as 'rapid relapse' (rrTNBC; distant relapse or death ≤2 years of diagnosis), 'late relapse' (lrTNBC; > 2 years) or 'no relapse' (nrTNBC: > 5 years no relapse/death). We explored basic clinical and primary tumor multi-omic data, including whole transcriptome (n = 453), and whole genome copy number and mutation data for 171 cancer-related genes (n = 317). Association of rapid relapse with clinical and genomic features were assessed using Pearson chi-squared tests, t-tests, ANOVA, and Fisher exact tests. We evaluated logistic regression models of clinical features with subtype versus two models that integrated significant genomic features.

Results

Relative to nrTNBC, both rrTNBC and lrTNBC had significantly lower immune signatures and immune signatures were highly correlated to anti-tumor CD8 T-cell, M1 macrophage, and gamma-delta T-cell CIBERSORT inferred immune subsets. Intriguingly, lrTNBCs were enriched for luminal signatures. There was no difference in tumor mutation burden or percent genome altered across groups. Logistic regression mModels that incorporate genomic features significantly outperformed standard clinical/subtype models in training (n = 63 patients), testing (n = 63) and independent validation (n = 34) cohorts, although performance of all models were overall modest.

Conclusions

We identify clinical and genomic features associated with rapid relapse TNBC for further study of this aggressive TNBC subset.

SUBMITTER: Zhang Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8130400 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The rates and routes of lethal systemic spread in breast cancer are poorly understood owing to a lack of molecularly characterized patient cohorts with long-term, detailed follow-up data. Long-term follow-up is especially important for those with oestrogen-receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers, which can recur up to two decades after initial diagnosis1-6. It is therefore essential to identify patients who have a high risk of late relapse7-9. Here we present a statistical framework that models distinct disease stages (locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, breast-cancer-related death and death from other causes) and competing risks of mortality from breast cancer, while yielding individual risk-of-recurrence predictions. We apply this model to 3,240 patients with breast cancer, including 1,980 for whom molecular data are available, and delineate spatiotemporal patterns of relapse across different categories of molecular information (namely immunohistochemical subtypes; PAM50 subtypes, which are based on gene-expression patterns10,11; and integrative or IntClust subtypes, which are based on patterns of genomic copy-number alterations and gene expression12,13). We identify four late-recurring integrative subtypes, comprising about one quarter (26%) of tumours that are both positive for ER and negative for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, each with characteristic tumour-driving alterations in genomic copy number and a high risk of recurrence (mean 47-62%) up to 20 years after diagnosis. We also define a subgroup of triple-negative breast cancers in which cancer rarely recurs after five years, and a separate subgroup in which patients remain at risk. Use of the integrative subtypes improves the prediction of late, distant relapse beyond what is possible with clinical covariates (nodal status, tumour size, tumour grade and immunohistochemical subtype). These findings highlight opportunities for improved patient stratification and biomarker-driven clinical trials.

Project description:ObjectivePatients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) frequently develop resistance to chemotherapy. Studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) are often aberrantly expressed in TNBC and are associated with drug resistance. However, a prognostic strategy that correlates miRNAs with chemotherapy resistance remains largely unknown.MethodsTo identify breast cancer chemoresistance-associated miRNAs, the miRNA microarray dataset GSE71142 was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Differentially expressed miRNAs (DE-miRNAs) in chemoresistant groups were identified using the LIMMA package in R. Potential target genes were predicted using the miRTarBase 9. Functional and pathway enrichment analyses was done using WebGestalt. A protein-protein interaction network was visualized using Cytoscape software. The top six hub genes regulated by DE-miRNAs were identified using the random forest model. The chemotherapy resistance index (CRI) in TNBC was defined as sum of the median expression levels of the top six hub genes. The association of CRI with distant relapse risk was evaluated using point-biserial correlation coefficient in the validation cohorts of patients with TNBC. The correlation between CRI and cumulative hazard rate was estimated using the Cox model, and the predicted rate of distant relapse was obtained from the Breslow-type estimator of the survival function. All statistical computations were performed using Origin2019b.ResultsA total of 12 DE-miRNAs were screened, including six upregulated and six downregulated miRNAs in chemoresistant breast cancer tissues compared with chemosensitive tissues. Based on fold changes, miR-214-3p, miR-4758-3p, miR-200c-3p, miR-4254, miR-140-3p, and miR-24-3p were the top six most upregulated miRNAs, whereas miR-142-5p, miR-146-5p, miR-1268b, miR-1275, miR-4447, and miR-4472 were the top six most downregulated miRNAs. The top three hub genes for upregulated miRNAs were RAC1, MYC, and CCND1 and for downregulated miRNAs were IL-6, SOCS1, and PDGFRA. CRI was significantly associated with the risk of distant relapse.ConclusionCRI predicted survival benefits with reduced hazard rate.

Project description:IntroductionOverexpression of the androgen receptor (AR) characterizes a distinct molecular subset of triple negative breast carcinomas (TNBC). The role of AR as a prognostic/predictive biomarker in TNBC is controversial, but increasing evidence suggests that this subset may respond to therapeutic agents targeting AR. Evaluation of AR has not been standardized, and criteria for selection of patients for antiandrogen therapy remain controversial. In this study we determine the appropriate threshold of AR immunoreactivity to define AR positive (AR+) TNBC, describe the clinicopathologic features of AR+ TNBC, and discuss the utility of AR positivity as a prognostic and predictive marker in TNBC.Materials and methods135 invasive TNBC processed in accordance with ASCO/CAP guidelines, were immunostained for AR. Clinicopathologic features of AR+ TNBC were analyzed and compared to AR negative (AR-) TNBC. Patients' age, tumor size, tumor grade, lymph node status, proliferation rate, immunopositivity for EGFR, CK5/6, Ki-67, and disease free survival (DFS) were evaluated statistically.ResultsA 1% cutpoint was confirmed as the appropriate threshold for AR positivity. Using this cutpoint 41% of 135 TNBC were AR+. AR+ TNBC occurred in older women, were larger, had lower mean proliferation rate and increased incidence of axillary metastasis than AR- TNBC. 76% of TNBC with apocrine morphology were AR+. A subset of AR+TNBC expressed basal markers (EGFR and CK5/6). A prognostic model was created.SummaryAR identifies a heterogeneous group of TNBC. Additional evaluation of EGFR expression allowed us to stratify TNBCs into 3 risk groups with significant differences in DFS and therapeutic implications: low-risk (AR+ EGFR-) which represents the LAR molecular subtype with the best prognosis and may benefit the most from anti-androgen therapies; high-risk (AR- EGFR+) which represents the basal molecular subtype with the worst prognosis and may benefit the most from chemotherapy regimens; intermediate-risk (AR+EGFR+ and AR-EGFR-) TNBC with an intermediate prognosis. Prospective trials are required to further validate this prognostic and predictive grouping.