Dataset Information

Perceptions around bone-modifying agent use in patients with bone metastases from breast and castration resistant prostate cancer: a patient survey.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Optimal use of bone-modifying agent (BMA) therapy in patients with bone metastases from breast and castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is evolving.

Methods

Patients receiving BMA for bone metastases from breast or CRPC were surveyed. Information was collected on patient and disease characteristics, BMA treatments and perceptions regarding BMA benefits and side effects. Interest in participation in trials of de-escalated BMA therapy was also gauged.

Results

Of 220 patients contacted, 172 eligible patients responded (response rate 78%). Median age was 67 (range: 21-91); 137 (80%) had breast cancer and 35 (20%) CRPC. Symptomatic skeletal events (SSEs) occurred prior to starting BMAs in 61% (84/137) of breast and 48% (17/35) of CRPC patients. Among breast cancer patients, 47, 33 and 13% received zoledronate, pamidronate and denosumab, respectively. Eighty-five percent (30/35) of CRPC patients received denosumab. De-escalation of therapy was more common among breast cancer patients. Although most patients correctly reported the goals of BMA therapy were to "help stop fractures" (62%) and "[improve] quality of life" (63%), 46.5% felt it prolonged survival and 54% felt it reduced bone progression. Most respondents (102/129, 79%) were comfortable with de-escalating to 6-monthly treatment after 2 years of BMA therapy. Patients considered the most important endpoints of de-escalation studies to be "stability of bone metastases" (45%), "quality of life" (22%) and "SSE rates" (14%).

Conclusion

Twelve weekly BMA was more common in breast than in prostate cancer. There remain misconceptions about the benefits of BMAs, highlighting potential gaps in patient education. Patients were interested in further BMA de-escalation after 2 years of prior BMA and provided study endpoints that were most important to them.

SUBMITTER: Alzahrani M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8140584 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:Whole-body assessments of 18F-NaF positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) provide promising quantitative imaging biomarkers of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). This study investigated whether the distribution of metastases across anatomic regions is prognostic of progression-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS:Fifty-four mCRPC patients with osseous metastases received baseline NaF PET/CT. Patients received chemotherapy (n = 16) or androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (n = 38). Semiautomated analysis using Quantitative Total Bone Imaging software extracted imaging metrics for the whole, axial, and appendicular skeleton as well as 11 skeletal regions. Five PET metrics were extracted for each region: number of lesions (NL), standardized maximum uptake value (SUVmax), average uptake (SUVmean), sum of uptake (SUVtotal), and diseased fraction of the skeleton (volume fraction). Progression included that discovered by clinical, biochemical, or radiographic means. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed between imaging metrics and progression-free survival, and were assessed according to their hazard ratios (HR) and concordance (C)-indices. RESULTS:The strongest univariate models of progression-free survival were pelvic NL and SUVmax with HR = 1.80 (NL: false discovery rate adjusted P = .001, SUVmax: adjusted P = .001). Three other region-specific metrics (axial NL: HR = 1.59, adjusted P = .02, axial SUVmax: HR = 1.61, adjusted P = .02, and skull SUVmax: HR = 1.58, adjusted P = .04) were found to be stronger prognosticators relative to their whole-body counterparts. Multivariate model including region-specific metrics (C-index = 0.727) outperformed that of whole-body metrics (C-index = 0.705). The best performance was obtained when region-specific and whole-body metrics were included (C-index = 0.742). CONCLUSION:Quantitative characterization of metastatic spread by anatomic location on NaF PET/CT enhances potential prognostication. Further study is warranted to optimize the prognostic and predictive value of NaF PET/CT in mCRPC patients.